Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

Do You Have To Be Crazy To Be President?

Well, it would seem as though you have to be crazy to enjoy running for President anyway:

Fred Thompson is in the middle of a 40 town Iowa tour - so he is hardly lazy. And he does go on television shows - thus dealing with critics, such as myself, who attacked him for not going on enough shows. But what sort of person would enjoy all this?

A lunatic. Someone who was interested in office for its own sake - not as a means to reduce the size and scope of government.

What the media, including Fox News (the only non-leftist news station and, therefore, of vital importance in the Republican nomination process), are saying is that Fred Thompson is too sane to be President. It is not enough to produce detailed policies for dealing with the entitlement program Welfare State (a cancer that is destroying the United States and the rest of the Western World), or producing a new optional flat tax (individuals could continue to use the existing system if they wished to) to deal with the nightmare of complexity that the income tax has become.

It is not even enough to have a long record of service, going back to Watergate and taking down a corrupt Governor of Tennessee in the 1970’s. And having one of the most Conservative voting records in the United States Senate - before leaving it in disgust at how the system did not allow real reform.

No - someone has to enjoy the prospect for office for its own sake, not to reduce the size and scope of government and restore a Federal Republic. One must enjoy the whole process of politics - i.e. be crazy. Or one must pretend to enjoy it - i.e. be a liar.

And then people complain that politicians are either crazy or corrupt. When they shoo away anyone who comes along who is neither crazy or corrupt.

Glenn Reynolds adds:

Thompson is running the kind of campaign—substantive, policy-laden, not based on gimmicks or sound-bites—that pundits and journalists say they want, but he’s getting no credit for it from the people who claim that’s what they want.

This is something I’ve been saying for a while.  It’s a point I brought up when then folks at National Review endorsed Mitt Romney.  People keep complaining that Thompson hasn’t run a good enough campaign, but they’re putting style of substance with that accusation.  As is noted above, Thompson has run a serious campaign with none of the grandstanding, pandering or baby-kissing nonsense that usually goes into national politics.

It’s the sort of political campaign we all talk about wanting to see when we start getting cynical about politics.  I suspect the real problem is that the media makes its bread and butter off of controversial campaign and attention-grabbing grandstanding.  But Thompson isn’t willing to dance for them, so he gets tagged as “lazy.” Not because he is lazy, but because he won’t be their trained monkey.

Comments

The more Thompson refuses to play the media’s sick little game the more they are attacking him and the more people like him. As I said in the thread about him shunning O’Reilly, Fred telling the press to piss off is making him more attractive to voters, not less.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on January 2, 2008 at 06:58 am

All of the rest of the Republican candidates act the clown for the media. The Democrats are the jokers. The media is the ringmaster.

It’s a circus and Fred Thompson wants nothing to do with it. Good for him.

likwidshoe on January 2, 2008 at 07:17 am

I think now Fred Thompson will shock the experts. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit to see him win it all.

The call went out for add money and was filled in two days.

I know I’m voting for him and so are many others.

we shall see… smile

golfmann on January 2, 2008 at 07:59 am
Avatar for John D

Going by the media standards the most qualified candidate is Hillary. Just because she wants it so badly.

Never mind. I’;; take Fred. I have noticed that almost every column I have read on the candidates goes down the list of problems with each candidate but when it comes to Fred they say his record and positions are great...but he can’t be elected.

John D on January 2, 2008 at 08:02 am

I don’t want to be a wet blanket on Thompson, but it is my impression since 1960, that most people want a movie star president, style trumps substance. Strangely, Thompson a very good actor and Hollywood savvy is not filling the role of movie star. Obama and Edwards would not be in the running except they have that media savvy, movie star image and of course Hillary and Bill perfected it in the White House.

Part of the secret is looking like a President, which gives Romney an advantage, Huckabee doesn’t have it and will soon fade away, Rudy in an odd way does have the image and he knows how to play the camera. I watched Thompson’s latest commercial, he spoke to each issue with low key passion, and who knows how the voters will respond for sure. I am just saying we are an instant gratification, image conscious generation, we respond to what we see on television and I fear that is what will happen this year, people will want a slick talking movie star and I fear Obama is looking more and more like the minority Messiah in the body of a movie star. I hope I’m wrong!


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on January 2, 2008 at 08:26 am

I have noticed the media showing polls and they completely leave Fred Thompson out. It seems odd to me that the same people who have fought for conservative values are now supporting Huckabee. Fred Thompson is for all the conservative principal core values conservatives have always been about. AND he believes in God!

Zsa Zsa on January 2, 2008 at 08:30 am

Zsa Zsa: The reason so many people have supported Huckabee despite his not having any real conservative credentials is that with so many people in the primaries, any criticism of his actual record is not getting to the people; and so for now his alleged Christian moral/spiritual beliefs and his alleged conservative record is making him appealing to a active voter segment of the Republican electorate, but I assure you that support will soon fade away.

I have supported Thompson but I also know that his age, low key approach and lack of a sexy movie star image is hurting him in the media. He needs to find a way to stand out among the crowd to give his candidacy enough life to weed out many of the other candidates. Then he can win, but if he trusts solely in the power of ideas and calm in the midst of the storm, he will get swamped by the media savvy camera hogs.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on January 2, 2008 at 08:42 am

Neiman, I agree with you about his approach. He really needs to stand out more. What is funny to me is I find him very outstanding! I do know a couple of people who I have admired very much and I have respected their politics for quite awhile who are ignoring some of Huckabees socialist tendencies just because they are Baptist.

Zsa Zsa on January 2, 2008 at 08:54 am

Zsa Zsa: The difference between me and some others here, is that I don’t blame Christians for preferring a candidate that shares their moral-spiritual values; and I don’t think insulting Huckabee and through him these Christians is at all helpful, although I understand how tempting it is to call people bad names. You are absolutely right about Huckabee’s socialist tendencies and the more people, even Christians learn about him the less support he will have.

It is also true that it is the responsibility of the candidate to find a way to separate themselves from the crowd that the media cannot help but report. Thus, getting the camera back on them, they’ll have the opportunity to educate the voters. Thompson is in that position now, he needs to, like a football player running with the ball, stick out his arm and push off the person trying to tackle him and then sprint for the goal line.

Want to read something scary? I have this terrible gut feeling that there is a very real chance Obama will run away with the whole thing, all the way into the White House. Yes, I should take your advice of a long time ago and wash out my mouth with soap.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on January 2, 2008 at 09:07 am

I have that same feeling. I don’t know which one is worse of the Dems though?? It is like when you think you can’t get any worse, the next one is even more so. Hillary’s voice is so annoying…

Zsa Zsa on January 2, 2008 at 09:28 am
Avatar for FlyOnTheWall

Neiman

...if he trusts solely in the power of ideas and calm in the midst of the storm, he will get swamped by the media savvy camera hogs.

I think his ‘anti-candidacy’ might be what attracts me.  He talks issues, slowly and without buzzwords.  Add to that he’s downright ugly and he’s the AntiEdwards.  What more could I want? 
My wife’s pushing for Huckabee, my opinions are still soft.  Way too early in the process to be THAT worked up.

FlyOnTheWall on January 2, 2008 at 09:29 am

FlyOnTheWall: Your point is well taken, but you are already sold, it is a matter of attracting other voters isn’t it? I don’t want him to change his ideas or even his calm, steady approach, but I am saying he needs to get their attention first.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on January 2, 2008 at 09:32 am

A perfect example of the media influencing interpretations. Say, “Fred Thompson Does Not Want to be President” 100,000,000 times and enough people will believe it to cause him not to be elected.

The fact is that Fred did not say that at all.

Who does it appear that the media wants to be elected? Who owns the media? What do they stand to gain? Don’t stop asking questions when you get the answer that you want. Stop when there are no more questions.

ews48 on January 2, 2008 at 10:09 am

Have I missed the whole point on Glenn’s article?

Isn’t he pointing out the blatant failure of the media and the majority of voters to identify the ideals we whine about year after year??

This isn’t Fred’s problem, this is OURS.


"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill disciplined, despotic, and useless. Liberalism is the philosophy of sniveling brats.” - P.J. O’Rourke


Winghunter's signature
Winghunter on January 2, 2008 at 10:37 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.