Details For The Enemy
This from the New York Times:
Why on earth is the New York Times reporting all of these details to us? If Aero Contractors really is supposed to be a secret air service for the CIA is it really the Times' responsibility to divulge that to the public regardless of how "thin" the "cover" is for the operation?
Heck, just in the excerpt above the Times reveals the name of the company, where the planes take off from, some history of their operations and a little bit of standard operating procedure. If you click through to the link above they've even got a picture of one of the planes that are used including a description of the model and a clearly visible registration number.
Now tell me, why is the Times reporting this information to us? If the CIA is using a charter company as a cover for covert missions to capture terrorist leaders what exactly is the big deal? Isn't that exactly what we want the CIA to be doing?
Whose side is the New York Times on?
SMITHFIELD, N.C. - The airplanes of Aero Contractors Ltd. take off from Johnston County Airport here, then disappear over the scrub pines and fields of tobacco and sweet potatoes. Nothing about the sleepy Southern setting hints of foreign intrigue. Nothing gives away the fact that Aero's pilots are the discreet bus drivers of the battle against terrorism, routinely sent on secret missions to Baghdad, Cairo, Tashkent and Kabul.
When the Central Intelligence Agency wants to grab a suspected member of Al Qaeda overseas and deliver him to interrogators in another country, an Aero Contractors plane often does the job. If agency experts need to fly overseas in a hurry after the capture of a prized prisoner, a plane will depart Johnston County and stop at Dulles Airport outside Washington to pick up the C.I.A. team on the way.
Aero Contractors' planes dropped C.I.A. paramilitary officers into Afghanistan in 2001; carried an American team to Karachi, Pakistan, right after the United States Consulate there was bombed in 2002; and flew from Libya to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, the day before an American-held prisoner said he was questioned by Libyan intelligence agents last year, according to flight data and other records.
While posing as a private charter outfit - "aircraft rental with pilot" is the listing in Dun and Bradstreet - Aero Contractors is in fact a major domestic hub of the Central Intelligence Agency's secret air service. The company was founded in 1979 by a legendary C.I.A. officer and chief pilot for Air America, the agency's Vietnam-era air company, and it appears to be controlled by the agency, according to former employees.
Behind a surprisingly thin cover of rural hideaways, front companies and shell corporations that share officers who appear to exist only on paper, the C.I.A. has rapidly expanded its air operations since 2001 as it has pursued and questioned terrorism suspects around the world.
Why on earth is the New York Times reporting all of these details to us? If Aero Contractors really is supposed to be a secret air service for the CIA is it really the Times' responsibility to divulge that to the public regardless of how "thin" the "cover" is for the operation?
Heck, just in the excerpt above the Times reveals the name of the company, where the planes take off from, some history of their operations and a little bit of standard operating procedure. If you click through to the link above they've even got a picture of one of the planes that are used including a description of the model and a clearly visible registration number.
Now tell me, why is the Times reporting this information to us? If the CIA is using a charter company as a cover for covert missions to capture terrorist leaders what exactly is the big deal? Isn't that exactly what we want the CIA to be doing?
Whose side is the New York Times on?
Move_Zig
docdave
Jay
Hairy Polemic
goon
Zsa Zsa
Rob
Neiman
Chief RZ
