Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, February 25, 2008

Despite His Opposition To NAFTA, Obama Says He Really Is In Favor Of Trade

Just not the sort of trade that might let some evil corporation turn a profit.

LORAIN, Ohio (Reuters) - Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama assured U.S. trading partners on Sunday that he did not oppose free trade despite making increasingly critical comments about multilateral deals such as NAFTA.

Obama, an Illinois senator, has turned trade into a centerpiece of his campaign in Ohio, where trade agreements are particularly unpopular as domestic manufacturing jobs disappear. . . .

...Obama, who would enter the White House with only four years of experience as a U.S. senator in addition to several years in the Illinois legislature, said his misgivings about NAFTA did not mean he was opposed to such accords in general.

Asked how other countries should interpret his position, Obama responded that he supported free trade but wanted it to be fair.

“What the world should interpret is my consistent position, which is I believe in trade,” he said after meeting with workers at a manufacturing plant in Ohio.

“I just want to make sure that the rules of the road apply to everybody and they are fair and that they reflect the interests of workers and not just corporate profits.”

This is more economic fascism along the lines of Obama’s “Patriot Corporations” idea.  See, fascists saw their economic policies as splitting the difference between free markets and socialism.  In free markets the means of production (businesses, etc.) are owned by private entities.  In socialism, the means of production are owned by the state.

With fascism, the means of production are owned by private entities but the state controls them.  This is how Obama wants things to operate.  With Patriot Corporations he’ll only give tax and regulatory relief to companies that do business as he sees fit.  And with his stance on trade, he’ll apparently only trade with other countries in such a way as he deems “fair.”

But that, my friends, is not freedom.  That’s central economic planning, and history has taught us that it never works.

Comments

We should be careful about how much we endorse NAFTA as “free” trade; it’s an agreement with thousands of pages, and my younger brother worked for a company that was trying to help people navigate the byzantine maze of import/export regulations that existed AFTER we passed NAFTA & GATT.

Now consider that it’s a whole lot easier for big companies to deal with this mess when moving a whole freighter’s worth of stuff through than it is for the little guy to get his half a container through; whether we like it or not, NAFTA does advantage big business over small.

So Obama’s got a point; he’s got the wrong solution, but he’s got a point.

Bike Bubba on February 25, 2008 at 11:07 am

If elected, Obama will be a disaster for our country, even worse that Hillary.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on February 25, 2008 at 11:55 am

As an aside, don’t you think that the Beam quote in my signature applies quite well to Obama.


You don’t have to be a moron to be a liberal Democrat but it sure helps.

docdave on February 25, 2008 at 01:52 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.