Democrats, Teacher Unions Looking To Kill Successful School Choice Program In Milwaukee

It’s cheap for the taxpayers. It gets results with the students. But it funds the students and not the teachers, so obviously it must go.

Milwaukee is home to America’s most vibrant school-choice program: More than 20,000 students participate, almost all of them minorities. They have made academic gains and boast higher graduation rates than their peers in public schools. They even save money for taxpayers. …
Taxpayers currently hand over $13,468 per student to Milwaukee Public Schools, compared to just $6,607 per student in the school-choice program. In 2008 alone, school choice saved the public almost $32 million, according to Robert M. Costrel of the University of Arkansas. Since 1994, the figure is $180 million. The savings would be even larger if more students used vouchers.

Taxpayer savings? Thriving students? Well, the Democrats just can’t have that:

Inevitably, Democrats in the state capital are trying to eviscerate the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program. …
Last week, the legislature’s Joint Finance Committee approved a series of auditing, accrediting, and instructional requirements that will force successful voucher schools to shift resources away from classrooms and into administration. Several schools will have to comply with new bilingual-education mandates, even though many immigrant parents choose those schools precisely because they emphasize the rapid acquisition of English instead of native-language maintenance.
Lawmakers also propose to strip funding for school choice. With the value of each voucher reduced, private schools will see their payments fall. Meanwhile, public schools will watch their budgets increase by hundreds of dollars per student.

Whenever Republicans oppose spending on some new entitlement program, liberals usually respond with some variation of the “it’s for the children” argument, and tacitly accuse Republicans of being big meanies who hate little kids. In this situation, though, Democrats are favoring the best interests of teachers unions over the best interests of children. Often poor children living in rough neighborhoods who, without a good choice for a school, might not ever make much of themselves.
So I ask, why do these Democrats hate the children? Maybe because the kids don’t have a lobbying group as powerful as the NEA.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Buzz

    if you don’t want them to associate with minorities.

    I don’t care if they associate with minorities, in fact it is good that they get a taste of what it is like to have to deal with other cultures. I just don’t want
    the entire class to be slowed down so a few kids that are not given the attention and support at home try to catch up to their grade level.

    The reason that school vouchers work is because you have some parents that actually care if their kids get an education, and are willing to work with their kids to keep them up to speed, just like any parent has to do. Those kids excel and make it look like you can just send any kid to a private school and they will do good. Which isn’t the case, if the parents do not help he kids at home, set limits, feed the poor bastards breakfast, they are not going to simply absorb knowledge because they are not in the public school system.

  • badlands4

    You know RA, that is a pretty slimy statement to make. Who managed to get the successful scholarship program in D.C. tossed out funding wise? Oh yes, a WHITE senator. I believe it was Dick Durban from Ill.

    I homeschool my children as well, and have done so for years. We are obviously teaching radically different curriculums.

    Back to the topic, a few years ago, 20/20 did a report called “Stupid in America” and it was specifically about why our education system is so bad in this country, even though we spend, by a large amount, more on average for our students.

    They compared Belgium students and American students, from “high quality” schools. American students got their clocks cleaned, and were called “stupid” by one of the Belgium students. The difference between most of Western Europe and the U.S.? Remember we spend MORE money per child than they do. The difference is choice…from the piece:

    American schools don’t teach as well as schools in other countries because they are government monopolies, and monopolies don’t have much incentive to compete. In Belgium, by contrast, the money is attached to the kids — it’s a kind of voucher system. Government funds education — at many different kinds of schools — but if a school can’t attract students, it goes out of business.

    Belgian school principal Kaat Vandensavel told us she works hard to impress parents.

    She told us, “If we don’t offer them what they want for their child, they won’t come to our school.” She constantly improves the teaching, saying, “You can’t afford 10 teachers out of 160 that don’t do their work, because the clients will know, and won’t come to you again.”

    “That’s normal in Western Europe,” Harvard economist Caroline Hoxby told me. “If schools don’t perform well, a parent would never be trapped in that school in the same way you could be trapped in the U.S.”

    http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/story?id=1500338

    If you *really* care about the kids, then you go out of your way to make sure the students are benefiting from the public school system, not the union or school administrations. Quit wasting money on stupid things and, as the charter school in the article was able to do, you can pay your teachers more.

  • badlands4

    No, I didn’t know that(I am from CA originally) That’s too bad. What was the reasoning? I wonder how the test scores would compare.

  • badlands4

    But, would the kids be “slower” if they had choice to begin with? I don’t know, but it seems to be a logical conclusion when you consider how evenly matched to each other students in the rest of the world are, that either have school choice, or the schools all have the same high standards. There isn’t a huge gap between “slow” kids and those that excel…they are all closer to the excel.

    Just a thought, but I have no answers.

  • Buzz

    What a great idea, I pay a shitload extra money to send my kids to a private school so my kids classes are not dragged down by “slower” students. Everything is going well, the classes are flying along, then here comes the same “slower” kids I have payed to keep my kids away from.

    Yea, I would be all for that.

  • badlands4

    Oh and RA, we get no subsidies for homeschooling. Your race has nothing to do with it. It is a bias against homeschooling, not your race. I could be purple, pink, black, white, brown, yellow, chartreuse or neon pink and still would not get a subsidy or tax cut. There are Christians, Jews, Pagans, Black, White, Asians, etc; a rainbow of race and beliefs who homeschool now, and they don’t get any subsidies either.

  • http://northerngleaner.blogspot.com/ Gene

    Badlands, did you know that in the 70s money used to follow the student in North Dakota. A voucher program.

    And the REPUBLICANS voted it out.

    I am ashamed of what it all became in the hope of “Protecting schools and teachers”.

    BRING BACK VOUCHERS

  • http://www.sayanythingblog.com/ electnixon

    What a great idea, I pay a shitload extra money to send my kids to a private school so my kids classes are not dragged down by “slower” students. Everything is going well, the classes are flying along, then here comes the same “slower” kids I have payed to keep my kids away from.

    Not all private schools participate in the voucher program. You can still send your kids to nonparticipatory schools if you don’t want them to associate with minorities.

    I’ve always wondered why so many people accept the fact that public schools provide crappy education for double the cost of private schools. It’s especially true in large cities where there are more alternatives available.

    Kansas City public schools announced that they are closing 13 schools next year because enrollment is anticipated to drop to 17,000. It peaked in the 1970s at 75,000 students. Despite currently spending over $16k per student, people have voted with their feet: either paying for private school, charter schools, or moving to areas with better public schools. This after the state drained $2B from other schools to implement so-called desegregation.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development