Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, November 11, 2006

Democrats Supporting Tax Cuts For The Rich!

This article about Democrat efforts to repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax is pretty interesting.

Democratic leaders this week vowed to make the alternative minimum tax a centerpiece of next year’s budget debate, saying the levy threatens to unfairly increase tax bills for millions of middle-class families by the end of the decade.

The complex and expensive tax was designed to prevent the super-rich from using deductions, credits and other shelters to avoid paying the Internal Revenue Service. But because of rising incomes, the tax is expected to expand to more than 30 million taxpayers in 2010 from 3.8 million mostly well-off households in 2006.

Wait a minute...rising income?  For the middle class?  That can’t possibly be true.  I mean, the Democrats have been telling us that the middle class is facing “stagnant wages” for a couple of years now.  They’ve also been telling us the economy is horrible, so how is it that this tax is impacting more people due to “rising wages?”

The article continues:

In simple terms, the AMT is sort of a flat tax with two brackets, 26 and 28 percent, and fewer deductions. Credits for dependents, medical expenses, and state and local taxes are all disallowed. Instead, taxpayers get a single big deduction, called the AMT exemption, which is set this year at $62,550 for married couples and $42,500 for singles. Taxpayers must compute their taxes both ways and pay whichever is higher.

The impact is harshest on taxpayers with annual incomes of $100,000 to $500,000.

So, this is a tax cut for the rich right?  I mean, when Bush pushed his tax cuts through which resulted in people who make less then the $44,389 national media salary paying less in taxes then they have in 30 years Democrats were all “tax cuts for the rich!”

Where is that rhetoric now?

Not that I’m opposed to ending the alternative minimum tax.  I view it as a confusing bit of tax policy nonsense and seeing it end would be no loss for this country.  I think the Republicans should join with Democrats in end it as their first gesture of bi-partisan cooperation.

Comments

Rob: Great article!  It is always good to point out the hypocrisy of Dem economic policy, and you have done an excellent job with this post.  BTW, the entire justification of the “tax cuts for the rich” meme was the reduction of the capital gains tax.
Since income tax is a penalty for generating income, it should be minimized for the benefit of all citizens.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on November 11, 2006 at 10:35 am

Republicans will remain in reality by pointing out that we’ve been calling for these things all along.

The Democrats will be busy crafting a new operative truth. “The rich” will now magically become the middle class. The “middle class squeeze” will become a middle class prosperity. The numbers and the reality of the situation won’t change much to warrent such a difference of rhetoric, but that doesn’t matter.

Get ready for a massive rewrite of both this country’s problems and prosperity.

likwidshoe on November 11, 2006 at 11:04 am

Get ready for a massive rewrite of both this country’s problems and prosperity.

I expect good news from Iraq and on the economy, starting in January, as if by magic.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on November 11, 2006 at 01:21 pm
Avatar for jpe

Wait a minute...rising income?  For the middle class?

Nominal wages are rising, and that’s why the AMT is capturing more middle class taxpayers.  That nominal income is rising doesn’t necessarily mean that real income is rising.  Given that you’re a republican, though, I shouldn’t have expected you to understand the fundamentals of economics.  Ah well.

jpe on November 11, 2006 at 02:16 pm

Total rewrite and continuing obfuscation of the economy. jpe makes the point precisely.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on November 11, 2006 at 02:22 pm
Rob
Rob
19961 comments
Send a private message

That nominal income is rising doesn’t necessarily mean that real income is rising.

Americans are moving up in the tax brackets, and you’re trying to convince me that we’re not making more money.

And you say I don’t understand economics.

“Real wages” isn’t the number you should be looking at, by the way.  Total compensation includes benefits too, and that level has been rising.

Why don’t you get a clue, jpe.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on November 11, 2006 at 02:56 pm
Avatar for jpe

People are making more money because of a thing called inflation, not because their real wages (which takes into account) have skyrocketed.

jpe on November 11, 2006 at 04:50 pm
Avatar for electnixon

I keep hearing about these poor souls who make $200k/yr that get a huge stock option and then their plethora of tax deductions don’t work on the AMT.  Darn, I can’t subsidize their kids anymore!

The AMT is as close to a flat tax as we can get.  I say leave it be and deal with not being able to deduct the following after you reach a certain income level:
Interest on Second Mortgages
Miscellaneous Itemized Deductions
Incentive Stock Options
Long-Term Capital Gains
Tax-Exempt Interest
Tax Shelters

electnixon on November 11, 2006 at 04:57 pm
Avatar for electnixon

People are making more money because of a thing called inflation,

And how will raising the minimum wage by more that 20% help this problem?  By increasing to cost of labor, thereby leading to even more inflation?

electnixon on November 11, 2006 at 05:01 pm

People are making more money because of a thing called inflation, not because their real wages (which takes into account) have skyrocketed.

Where were you during the Carter administration, when we had double-digit inflation and double-digit interest rates?  We survived that, and lowered tax rates restored prosperity.
No one has made the claim that wages are “skyrocketing”, btw.  You just made that straw man up all by yourself.  Total compensation is far greater than inflation, which means that we are getting wealthier.  Duh.


The only legitimate role of government with regard to economics is to prevent fraud and provide a remedy- civil and criminal penalties- in case of fraud.

People have the mistaken notion that the free market has no rules.  But it most certainly does.  All our problems are due to government meddling.

robert108 on November 11, 2006 at 05:10 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.