Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, September 30, 2007

Democrats’ SCHIP Expansion Would Be Funded By A Tax On The Poor And Uneducated

Because that’s the demographic that tends to smoke more than any other.

WASHINGTON - Congressional Democrats have chosen an unlikely source to pay for the bulk of their proposed $35 billion increase in children’s health coverage: people with relatively little money and education.

The program expansion passed by the House and Senate last week would be financed with a 156 percent increase in the federal cigarette tax, taking it to $1 per pack from the current 39 cents. Low-income people smoke more heavily than do wealthier people in the United States, making cigarette taxes a regressive form of revenue.

Democrats, who wrote the legislation and provided most of its votes, generally portray themselves as champions of the poor. They do not dispute that the tax plan would hit poor communities disproportionately, but they say it is worth it to provide health insurance to millions of modest-income children.

So it’s ok to tax the poor...when they’re smoking.  Because liberals don’t like smokers.  Oh, and by the way, the rest of the funding for this legislation will come through cutting funding for a health care plan for poor senior citizens.

This does kind of put the Dems between a rock and a hard place.  On one hand, if the smokers keep smoking it’ll be the poor paying this tax.  On the other hand, if the smokers stop smoking the SCHIP expansion won’t be fully funded.

Anyone thinking that this is an economically feasible way to fund an entitlement expansion is a fool.  But then, the Democrats probably don’t care.  If the funding falls short from smokers they’ll just make us all pay for SCHIP.

Comments

On Fox Sunday, I heard that up to 200,000 adults would be included and the children of people making $89,000 per year. I could be mistaken about the exact numbers, but that is what Trent Lott was saying.

I had the same thoughts about it being a regressive tax, harmful to the poor and if people stopped smoking, the Democrats would never let the program die so we would all pay for it, despite Schumer claiming the high moral road about this being a fully funded program.

Elsewhere at SA, I read where someone said this was a back door to socialized health care. Schumer verified that by saying it would force people off private health insurance to get the free ride of government paid health care.

Oh, if the government pays for this, does that mean they are a profit making enterprise and we won’t have to pay a dime?


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on September 30, 2007 at 12:15 pm

Rob,

I wonder how that’ll affect my Padron Anniversario’s or my Arturo Fuente Cigars…


All who have meditated on the art of governing mankind have been convinced that the fate of empires depends on the education of youth. —Aristotle ...

Joel on September 30, 2007 at 12:36 pm

I just thought about taxing cigarettes, we could follow the suggestion of others here to legalize marijuana ASAP on a federal level, then heavily tax marijuana and not only would it help fund the expanded SCHIP program, it could fund it for decades, as liberals don’t hate marijuana. The new slogan would be:

Legalize and Smoke Marijuana Now - Because We Love The Children.


No matter the age or state of health, for a military man it is always glorious to tilt at windmills, rescue a fair Dulcinea and be a gallant knight in armor in a glorious cause.

Neiman on September 30, 2007 at 12:49 pm
Avatar for OregonGuy

Raise taxes first, think later? Okay, if you’re a Democrat. But while they give with one hand remember, they’re taking with the other. It’s all about the current “fair”. I wrote about the impacts on our state’s poor here.

OregonGuy on September 30, 2007 at 01:09 pm
Avatar for halatbis

They buy a few million votes here and a few million there, pretty soon it adds up to winning the 2008 election--Schumer is no dummy. It is pretty clear that our votes can be bought, and we are willing to sell our independence in bits and pieces.

halatbis on September 30, 2007 at 02:30 pm

How are they going to tax the black market?

Good luck with that nanny-staters. People aren’t going to sit by and pay for this crap.

likwidshoe on September 30, 2007 at 04:43 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.