Why did building 7 collapse the way it did, when it appears to be only moderately damaged?

Maybe because it wasn’t “moderately damaged”? Unless, of course, you consider an entire corner of the building missing to be only “moderately damaged”.

Buy a clue Tim.

CTF: The only facts are the two airliners flown into the Twin Towers, and the collateral damage from their eventual collapse. Noises are not facts. The only bombs in the basement of the WTC went off in 1993, and were largely ignored by Clinton. He never even visited the site. A building in the process of collapsing makes a lot of noises, of that I am certain. Just because some crazy wants to believe that he heard explosive charges doesn’t make it so. Where are the forensics? Y2K.

You know nothing.
The facts are there. One can deny them, but they are still there.

Government facts, pal.

And there not going away soon.

Oh, people… You comment with such confidence that 9/11 conspiracy theory can’t be true… While it can be clearly seen that all you know about it is far from what you could know if you’ve tried to look into it more closely. Comparing people from 9/11 Truth Movement to holocaust deniers? C’mon… this is serious issue. Check how many scientists support 9/11 “conspiracy theory” (they support truth of course): http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/WhoAreWe.html

You demonstrate foolishness.

You can not address facts, so all you do is name-call. You are not showing a higher degree of intelligence, you do know that, don’t you?

Read the paper and maybe you might learn.
But until then, you know nothing.

And before I go (and remove you off of my radar), I leave you with a question: What are these two, different times that are from NIST and the 9/11 Commission, with both government entities stating the time is for the same event? Figure that one out with your limited faculties. But answer it for yourself (not for me; I’m outta here because I don’t waste time with the intellectually dishonest–those who can only use name-calling and proffer nonsensical answers devoid of logic).

I quit talking to brick walls years ago.
Adios

Here’s the 9/11 smoking gun.

—————————————————————————————————————————-
—————————————————————————————————————————-

No one has debunked this yet…and it’s not a “theory”–just the facts.
“Plane Impact” Times: Incriminating Evidence of 9/11 Coverup & Complicity

“Seismic Proof — 9/11 Was An Inside Job (Updated Version II)”
Link: http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/Seismic_Proof___9.11_Was_An_Inside_Job.doc
By Craig T. Furlong & Gordon Ross, Scholars for 9/11 Truth: http://www.st911.org

The official times for plane “impact” [precise to the second] as declared by the US Government, from both the 9/11 Commission and from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), are different and yet both are true and accurate times. What can this factual contradiction mean? Looking exclusively at WTC1, there is found the indisputable causal link:

One World Trade, September 11, 2001
American Airlines Flight 11 “impact” time:
8:46:30 UTC, per LDEO seismic data (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2005)
8:46:40 UTC, per FAA last primary radar contact (9/11 Commission Final Report, 2004)

Q- What caused the 8:46:30 seismic event that occurred 10 seconds before the actual aircrash at 8:46:40?
A- The only possibility is huge explosions, as corroborated by many eyewitnesses at the time.
Q- Who caused these explosions before the plane hit?

Notes:
In 2004, the 9/11 Commission avoided addressing the earlier seismic event time (which had been, in error, attributed by Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, originally in 2001 as “plane impact”).
In 2005, NIST avoided addressing the 9/11 Commission’s later time for the aircraft’s actual impact time.
Both the 9/11 Commission and NIST avoided addressing the many witnesses who testified of explosions in the basements before the plane crashed.

Summary:
This precision data has yet to be refuted by anyone. It is from the two highest governmental entities charged with looking into what happened on 9/11, and both declared these times as accurate, and in doing so they corroborate William Rodriguez and the many eyewitnesses the morning of 9/11 who testified of explosions in the sub-basements of WTC1 before American Airlines Flight 11 struck the building. This is indicting evidence of governmental coverup, and thus implication of complicity.

Before it is too late, demand a new 9/11 investigation, except this time a real one.
Justice waits…{and there is no statute of time limitation on murder}

Please remember that this ‘country’ was a ‘colony of old europe’,

False. The first settlers were people fleeing the religious persecution of Europe.

and it
still is a ‘colony’ of workers doing the bidding of the ‘elite’ group that has been colonizing and trashing the Earth for centuries.

Nice Marxist screed, but the only systems that require a “colony” of workers are Marxism and monarchism; our country is neither of those.

Please remember that this ‘country’ was a ‘colony of old europe’, and it still is a ‘colony’ of workers doing the bidding of the ‘elite’ group that has been colonizing and trashing the Earth for centuries.