Democrats Heckled Bush During Speeches; Harry Reid Called Him A Liar

Not that tu quoque is ever really a valid defense, but as the Democrats get up on their pedestals for 10 minutes hate of Rep. Joe Wilson today it’s worth noting some of the history Democrats have with President Bush. For instance:

In 2004, Democrats delivered a “Chorus Of Boos” during Bush’s Bush’s State Of The Union when he called for renewal of the Patriot Act., according to the Washington Times.
In 2005, Dems howled, hissed and shouted “No!” when Bush pushed for Social Security reform in the SOU: “Foreshadowing the contentiousness of the coming debate, Democrats broke decorum and booed twice,” according to the National Journal.
At the time, CNN’s Bill Schneider remarked, “It was unusual. I had never heard it at least at that level before. The Democrats clearly were booing, heckling, saying no when the president talked about the crisis in Social Security.”

Also this from Harry Reid in 2004:

MR. RUSSERT: When the president talked about Yucca Mountain and moving the nation’s nuclear waste there, you were very, very, very strong in your words. You said, “President Bush is a liar. He betrayed Nevada and he betrayed the country.”
Is that rhetoric appropriate?
SEN. REID: I don’t know if that rhetoric is appropriate. That’s how I feel, and that’s how I felt. I think to take that issue, Tim, to take the most poisonous substance known to man, plutonium, and haul 70,000 tons of it across the highways and railways of this country, past schools and churches and people’s businesses is wrong. It’s something that is being forced upon this country by the utilities, and it’s wrong. And we have to stop it. And people may not like what I said, but I said it, and I don’t back off one bit.

And, as the topper, remember when Democrats used to give tickets to groups like Code Pink so that they could go in and disrupt events like Bush’s inauguration and his state of the union addresses? People like Cindy Sheehan and Medea Benjamin have been given access to events by Democrats for the express purpose of disrupting them.
But Rep. Wilson speaking a little truth to power and calling Obama a liar. That’s unacceptable. That’s beyond the pale.
Nope, no hypocrisy here. Move along.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://Array DINO

    I was wondering how long it would take for you to post some version of unrelated victimhood whining.

  • Buzz

    Nope, never happened.

  • robert108

    The usual pathological denial from the well-trained leftie drones.

  • rog

    The libs are squealing like piglets over the lies outburst. It is the only part of the speech that mattered.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Harry Reid isn’t going to keep his seat through the next election. He is basically a lame duck.

  • robert108

    All they have to do is to produce the part of the Obamacare bill where it specifically bars illegals. If it exists, of course…

  • Spartacus

    All they have to do is to produce the part of the Obamacare bill where it specifically bars illegals. If it exists, of course…

    They’re probably writing that part right now, so San Francisco treat can come out tomorrow waving it around proclaiming “see, I told you so”

  • Lioncourt

    Watch the British parliament sometime. We are tame.

  • Neiman

    You IDIOTS! Don’t you get it yet? There are rules for Democrats and rules for Republicans! If the Democrats boo Bush, call him a liar or whatever, it is righteous anger at the prince of darkness and deserves a medal. If a Republican behaves honestly, albeit a little rudely, it is a crime against the Messiah and/or the Righteous Democrats worthy of death!

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Neiman. Exactly. Respect for “me” (the One) but not for thee.

  • http://www.worldcricketwatch.com/ World Cricket

    I didn’t realise there were such strict rules in such political debates. Here in Australia anything goes in the House.

  • BD

    My momma taught me when I was young: Two wrongs don’t make a right. Heckling is just bad form, no matter who does it. Time and place for everything, folks.

  • BD

    Robert108, et al:

    See http://tinyurl.com/l5z5pd:
    “The bill specifically says that people in the United States illegally are not eligible for tax credits, on page 132, section 242.”

    At least that’s the intent of the current (and probably doomed) House bill.

  • robert108

    BD: While it says that, it also prohibits asking for identification, so that leaves the door open for the illegals, just like Joe Wilson said. Obama lied, and Joe Wilson smacked him with the truth on national TV.
    In addition, Republicans attempted to introduce legislation specifically prohibiting illegals from eligibility, and were defeated by the Dems.

  • robert108

    My momma taught me when I was young: Two wrongs don’t make a right. Heckling is just bad form, no matter who does it. Time and place for everything, folks.

    More bullshit. Obama uses personal attack and lying smear against his political opponents; if you want to defeat someone who fights like that, you have to give them the same. The difference between them and real Americans like us is that we represent American values, and Obama is trying to impose “the dictatorship of the proletariat”.
    You don’t win a fistfight by offering a handshake.

  • http://ROBERTLHUFFSTUTTER.BLOGSPOT.COM/ Robert L.Huffstutter

    The Democrats will do all they can to keep the voters from focusing on any negatives like the ACORN SCANDAL…

  • http://phenobarbarella.wordpress.com/ Phenobarbarella

    What part about this is unclear? There is – according to this document drafted and approved by House Republicans – “wide latitude in criticizing the President.” You can disagree, you can say lots of things. But the line is drawn at “personality” – referring to the President’s character while on the House floor or in committee by using language like “liar” or “hypocrite.”

    Harry Reid did NOT call The Shrub a liar from the floor of the Senate. He stated the flat truth that George Bush had, in fact, lied about what he himself would do regarding the Yucca Mountain project.

    Likewise, “booing” has a long history in both the House and Senate. And just because Bob Schieffer says he can’t recall it at that volume previously doesn’t mean it never was; it just means Bob Schieffer can’t recall (or wasn’t present for) any such instances. But beyond that, both booing and saying “no” to Presidential vows to pass or support this or that law are protected expressions of disagreement, NOT matters of “personality” like ad hominem attacks on character such as “liar” or “hypocrite,” when uttered from the floor of the House or Senate.

  • Shelly

    I believe a sitting Senator calling Bush a liar (which he was and is) on a Sunday morning talk show is quite different than shouting it out during The President addressing a joint session of Contress.
    And the Republicans ‘booed’ Obama during the speech too.
    Nice try.

  • sayanything-6955
  • sayanything-6955

    From a law professor,

    People can debate whether bringing illegal aliens into a nationalized health care system is good or bad, but what is not debatable is that the House Bill would have brought illegal aliens into the system almost completely. The politically contentious issue of outright subsidies for illegal aliens would have been left for another day, but the ground work was being laid. Now that Obama is rejecting such an approach at least nominally that debate is over, although it will be interesting to see how Obama’s words are put into legislative writing.Again http://legalinsurrection.blogspot.com/

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development