Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, October 23, 2006

Democrats Continue Absurd National Opposition To Voter ID’s

This is so pathetic...

People in the good state of Missouri need photo identification to cash a check, board a plane or apply for food stamps. But the state Supreme Court has ruled that a photo ID requirement to vote is too great a burden on the elderly and the poor. Go figure.

Public polls consistently show that an overwhelming majority of Americans—regardless of age, race, ethnicity or socioeconomic status—favor voter ID laws. And nearly half of the nation’s states have passed them. Yet a string of recent court decisions has blocked their implementation in some places, thus siding with Democrats and liberal special interest groups who would rather turn a blind eye to voter fraud.

A Georgia judge ruled a voter ID law unconstitutional in September. Earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals blocked enforcement of a similar law in Arizona, only to be unanimously reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday. (While the Supremes didn’t decide on the merits, their willingness to let the ID requirement be enforced in next month’s election suggests some encouraging deference to state officials who want to protect the integrity of the ballot.) Also this month, a Seventh Circuit appeals panel heard arguments in a case concerning Indiana’s voter ID requirements. And the Michigan Supreme Court will consider a voter ID challenge in November. . . .

But there’s a reason that Democrat partisans are more interested in raising the specter of Jim Crow than in protecting the integrity of the voting process. And here’s a clue: While the Missouri Supreme Court was preparing its decision earlier this month, the Kansas City Star and St. Louis Post-Dispatch ran front-page stories about the thousands of fraudulent voter registrations submitted by Acorn, a national left-wing group financed in part by organized labor.

According to the Star, Acorn’s voter registration drive generated some 35,000 applications, “but thousands of them appear to be duplicates or contain dubious data.” The report went on to note that “[n]ear the top of the fishy list would be a man named Mark who apparently registered seven times over a three-day period using his mother’s home address and phone number.” Mom told the paper he hadn’t lived there in six years.

Acorn and its affiliates have been among the most active and vocal opponents of voter ID laws in Missouri and nationwide. Now we know why.

Indeed we do.

You know, if this were some right-wing group out collecting tends of thousands of false voter registrations while working in collusions with the Republican party to defeat anti-voter fraud measures in court the media/left would be apoplectic.  There would be front-page New York Times exclusives, endless chatter on the news talk shows and self-righteous demands for investigation by the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

But, since it’s Democrats, I guess this we’ll just get by with some criticism from the few conservative sources in the media like the Wall Street Journal.

What a friggin’ joke.

Comments

Avatar for WOOF

What would originalist Judges say?

At a time when many states are instituting new requirements for voter registration and identification, a preliminary report to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission has found little evidence of the type of polling-place fraud those measures seek to stop.

Report refutes fraud at poll sites

WOOF on October 23, 2006 at 07:43 pm
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

At a time when many states are instituting new requirements for voter registration and identification, a preliminary report to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission has found little evidence of the type of polling-place fraud those measures seek to stop.

So...you’re trying to say that the tends of thousands of illegal voter registrations Acorn is responsible doesn’t exist?

As for originalist judges, is there something in the constitution that makes voter fraud a right?

Why do you hate free and fair elections, woof?


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 23, 2006 at 07:51 pm
Avatar for WOOF

Was the Acorn thing like your parental rights petition?

Was there any fraudulent voting?

Why does the Republican party want to deny qualified
electors their right?
We know the answer to that.

WOOF on October 23, 2006 at 08:09 pm
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Was the Acorn thing like your parental rights petition?

Was there any fraudulent voting?

Tens of thousands of fraudulent registrations from all over the country is hardly equivalent to a handful of lazy temp workers from one specific town/agency who made up names so they didn’t have to pound the pavement.

Why does the Republican party want to deny qualified
electors their right?

Requiring voters to prove they are who they say they are hardly denies them their right.  But you’ll keep pretending that so that our elections are wide open for fraud again and again.

After all, if we tighten up security at the ballot boxes what will you liberals complain about when you lose?


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 23, 2006 at 08:15 pm
Avatar for WOOF

Voters will prove who they are as always did at the polls,

With their signature and a piece or two of paper.

They will vote, even in Arizona, without Foto IDs.

WOOF on October 23, 2006 at 08:27 pm
Avatar for gregdn

While I don’t think voter fraud is widespread, I just don’t think it’s too much to ask.  The photo ID thing is so common.

gregdn on October 24, 2006 at 03:01 am

Someone voting who is not eligible for whatever reason has the effect of canceling out someone elses vote.

We need to take all reasonable steps to stop voter fraud.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 24, 2006 at 03:29 am
Avatar for WOOF

If the states really wanted foto ID ,
they would issue the ID when people registered
or at the polls.

This is about vote suppression, not fraud.

WOOF on October 24, 2006 at 03:48 am
Avatar for Goon

Oh my god, how dare we make people prove they are legally able to vote. Dems don’t want this because they want everyone to vote reguardless if they are actually legal to vote.

Goon on October 24, 2006 at 04:33 am

Real Americans happily prove their eligibility to vote. You can not cash a check, welfare or otherwise, without ID. You can not even open a bank account without it. Can not buy alcohol or tobacco without it. And don’t try the “poor can’t afford them” meme, that is a load of crap. All who oppose ID for voter registration are pushing the vote fraud agenda, period. Now let the wailing and gnashing of teeth and rending of garments begin!


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 24, 2006 at 04:48 am
Avatar for WOOF

You can get a passport without a foto ID.

You do need 97 f’in dollars though.

WOOF on October 24, 2006 at 04:55 am
Avatar for Angus McMurphy

Woof said:

This is about vote suppression, not fraud.

Well, if this were true, then I would expect there to be a large number of complaints related to the requirement making voting too difficult.  An easy way to test this is to look at states that have had similar laws in place for awhile.

According to url=http://www.ncsl.org/programs/legman/elect/taskfc/voteridreq.htm]this site,[/url] five states enacted id laws in 2003: Alabama, Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.

I was unable to find reports of widespread voter disenfranchisement in these states.  Plenty of articles claiming it would or could happen, but nothing claiming it did.

Arizona passed a similar law in 2004, which generated the same hystria voiced earlier in this thread.  Earlier this year the law got its first test.  And the results were....

The Arizona law was later struck down by the Arizona courts despite there apparently being no evidence that such disenfranchisement occurred.  I say “apparently” because the US Supreme Court later vacated the ruling.

As for this from the article in the original post:

A Georgia judge ruled a voter ID law unconstitutional in September.

The law that was ruled unconstitutional was a new law requiring photo ID by all voters.  The pre-existing law which requires ID (not necessarily photo ID: the list of acceptable ID was large) is still in place in Georgia.

The claim that voter ID laws cause people to not vote just doesn’t seem to have the force of truth behind it.

Angus McMurphy on October 24, 2006 at 04:59 am
Avatar for Angus McMurphy

Sorry—don’t know what happened to that first link.  I used the tag buttons.  I USED THE TAG BUTTONS!!11!11!

Angus McMurphy on October 24, 2006 at 05:02 am

woofie, a passport is a form of photoID, dumbass.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 24, 2006 at 05:09 am
Avatar for J.R.

Hey woof,

So if the governments did issue photo IDs to everyone who registers, in person, to vote, would you then be OK with the Voter ID Laws?

J.R. on October 24, 2006 at 05:11 am

woofie wants all ID to be scrapped. That way his party, the Democrat Party, can run the same sets of people through welfare and voting, making their vote fraud and welfare fraud operations that much easier. ACORN workers would orgasm all over themselves with this one, getting to sit around and fill out registration forms with no possiblity of being prosecuted for fraud.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 24, 2006 at 05:18 am
Avatar for WOOF

if the governments did issue photo IDs to everyone who registers

Then I would be ok with it.

WOOF on October 24, 2006 at 05:22 am
Avatar for Mickey

Notice how Democrats will never admit that voter fraud is proven to be prevalent in their ranks. In their own mind, the Democrat is safe from being held accountable or responsible- not so much from their actions, but rather, their inactions. And yet, psychologically, they have managed to deceive themselves into thinking that what they are doing is for the “good” of the country. That their behavior is actually “patriotic”.

Hey, it’s about getting elected, right? What could be more important than that? Certainly not integrity.

Mickey on October 24, 2006 at 07:50 am
Avatar for Right On

I say Right On with the Voter ID laws.  If you can’t prove who you are and where you vote and that you are registered and when & where you registered and that you aren’t registered anywhere else and that your signature is valid and that the picture on your ID is really you and is a recent photo and that you haven’t voted already in this or any other precinct with this or any other ID, then you don’t deserve to vote and you are probably trying to cheat.  That is why we shouldn’t allow absentee voting anymore and why we shouldn’t allow the troops or shut-ins to vote.  Someone has to stop illegal immigrants from trying to run our country and I guess that has to be us becuase you know they won’t do it themselves.

Right On on November 3, 2006 at 01:14 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.