Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, July 13, 2007

Democrats Block Amendment That Would Block The Fairness Doctrine

Because what’s fair is the government, instead of actual listeners, telling radio stations what to put on the air.

Washington (AP) Senate Democrats have blocked an amendment to prevent the return of the Fairness Doctrine.

It’s an old federal rule that required broadcasters to air opposing views on issues.

Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman and other Republicans say a return to the rule would give the government too much power to regulate content. The House recently passed an amendment banning the rule’s return.

Coleman brought up the amendment today a defense authorization bill but the Democratic committee chairman blocked a vote.

Coleman says he disagrees with people who want to cut off talk radio because it’s conservative and says the people should decide.

You know who is loving this push for the fairness doctrine though?  Ed Schultz.  Why?  Because if radio stations have to start balancing popular conservative talk shows like Limbaugh and Hannity with liberal talk Schultz is going to be the go-to guy.  Because as much of a ponce as he is, Schultz is about the only liberal talker decent enough to listen to.

So, for him, it’s about money more than anything else.  This stands to be a windfall for Big Eddie.  Plus, the Democrats pay him to parrot their positions anyway.

North Dakota talk show host Ed Schultz says Republicans’ efforts are overreactions. He says he’s going to Washington next week to talk to Democrats about the issue.

Schultz says liberal talkers have not been given a market opportunity in many parts of the country. He’s frustrated because his show is not airing in such major markets as Boston and Philadelphia, where he says certain companies are keeping progressive shows out.

Ed is full of it when he claims that he’s being “kept out” of certain radio markets.  It’s true that he is being kept out, I guess, but it’s not an ideological thing.  It’s just that not many people actually like listening to him compared to other talk radio shows.

McQ at QandO analyzed the data on this some time ago:

...in markets where I could determine Schultz and Hannity/Limbaugh went head-to-head, Schultz was in 50, won 7* and lost 43. . . .

While Schultz isn’t represented in NY, the largest radio market, Air America is, and they get buried. The Limbaugh/Hannity station, WABC pulls a 3.7 while WWRL, the AA crew, pulls a .6.

But Schultz does show up in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th markets and gets buried in them. Number 2 is LA and even progressive LA isn’t interested in progressive talk. KFI, which carries Limbaugh and mostly local hosts pulls a 4.2. KABC, which is all conservative talk and includes Hannity has a 1.8. KTLK which has the AA gang (Bill Press, Stephanie Miller, Tom Hartman, Randi Rhodes, Mark Germain, Ed Schultz, Rachel Maddow and Alan Colmes) pulls a dismal 0.7.

In number 3 Chicago, it’s about the same. The top rated talk show is WGN with all local talent (5.3). WLS which carries Limbaugh and Hannity comes in second at 3.4. Coming in at #6 in a six station race is progressive talk radio with the AA gang and Schultz. Rating? 0.5.

Detroit, another market in which you’d think progressive talk radio might do well. It’s the #10 market in the US. Limbaugh/Hannity? A 5.9 on WJR. Schultz and the AA crowd? 0.6 on WDTW. 4th in a 5 talk radio market.

Probably most enlightening is the #4 market, San Francisco. If progressive talk can’t make it there, it can’t make it anywhere. And, as it turns out, progressive talk is tops in SF. It’s just not the progressive talk with Schultz. Instead it is local progressive hosts along with a mix of medical and legal shows which leads the ratings. KGO pulls a 5.5 in the market. And how do Limbaugh/Hannity do? Well not bad considering. KFSO, where they are carried, comes in at 3.2. And Schultz and the AA gang? 1.1 on KQKE. That’s number 4 in a 5 talk station market.

What’s that tell you?

It tells you that despite all this twaddle about ’structural problems’ in talk radio, that where at least Limbaugh and Hannity and progressive talk go head-to-head, listeners have consistently and overwhelmingly chosen the Limbaugh and Hannity.

The Fairness Docrtine may as well be called the Keep Ed Schultz Employed Act.

Comments

As a side note, I just don’t think the lefties would have liked something like that pesky ol’ fairness docrine sticking its nose in to their recent Global Warming concert.

Equal time concerning global warming. Wouldn’t that be something?


Election ‘08 - We Are So Screwed

Pilgrim on July 13, 2007 at 07:26 pm
Proof
Proof
12237 comments
Send a private message

Equal time concerning global warming.

That would consist of Al Gore speaking out of both sides of his mouth?



Trolls. It’s what’s for breakfast!
And then I eat their lunch.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on July 13, 2007 at 07:32 pm
Avatar for jpe

The FD is stupid.  I don’t know a Dem in the flesh and blood world that thinks otherwise.  IMHO, it’s a goofball issue that young and/or zany dems push, and that GOPers claim is mainstream Dem policy to make them all seem crazy.

If I were a GOPer, I’d do the same.  As a Dem, I do the same thing with GOPers’ zany ideas.  Y’know, like how you all want to eliminate social security or public schools.  That kind of broad-brushing is part of the game.

Political games aside, though, FD is stupid, and the recent votes show that very, very few Dems think it a good idea.

jpe on July 13, 2007 at 07:47 pm

That would consist of Al Gore speaking out of both sides of his mouth?

He could talk about how his swimming pool heater is destroying the environment.

Political games aside, though, FD is stupid, and the recent votes show that very, very few Dems think it a good idea.

They’d do it if they could get away with it.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on July 13, 2007 at 07:55 pm
Proof
Proof
12237 comments
Send a private message

Y’know, like how you all want to eliminate social security

...by making it solvent? Stop chewing the paint chips, jpe!


Trolls. It’s what’s for breakfast!
And then I eat their lunch.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on July 13, 2007 at 07:56 pm
Avatar for jpe

You can have the paint chips when you pull them out of my cold dead lips.

jpe on July 13, 2007 at 08:02 pm
Proof
Proof
12237 comments
Send a private message

You can have the paint chips when you pull them out of my cold dead lips.

Now you sound like MY president!



Trolls. It’s what’s for breakfast!
And then I eat their lunch.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on July 13, 2007 at 08:04 pm
Avatar for jpe

"I hate you all” will be my slogan, and I’m running on the Misanthropy Party.

With a nod to the Whistler Plan, of course.

jpe on July 13, 2007 at 08:22 pm
Avatar for Jaxebad

You know who is loving this push for the fairness doctrine though?  Ed Schultz.

Completely incorrect. Schultz has brought up this issue many times in the past few weeks, and he wholeheartedly rejects renewing the Fairness Doctrine. He does complain about the severe ideological imbalance of talk radio, but he also mentions that bringing back the Fairness Doctrine will not solve the problem.

Jaxebad on July 14, 2007 at 02:57 am
Rob
Rob
18552 comments
Send a private message

From the article it sure doesn’t sound as though he’s against the Fairness Doctrine.  And he certainly spends a lot of time whining about that “ideological imbalance” you talk off.

Something tells me that Big Eddie isn’t going to accept that he can’t compete with Rush because he’s not as good as Rush (or any of the other conservative talkers who routinely out rank him), and will support the fairness doctrine 100%.

Not only because that’s what’s best for his wallet, but because that’s the sort of thing Democrats pay him to say.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 14, 2007 at 07:04 am

We used to have Eddie on local radio here doing a morning News and Views show as well as the Sioux football games.

He sucked at both. 

His morning show was just plain dull as rocks. 

He was a terrible football play by play guy. 

Ed used to be a conservative until I think he figured out that he could chart out some ground as a liberal.  But I drew my conclusions before I realized that he had gone liberal.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on July 14, 2007 at 07:11 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.