Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Democrats Backing Cindy

Oh my...


"It stunned me because I didn't know in America you could be arrested for wearing a T-shirt with a slogan on it,'' Woolsey said. "That's especially so in the Capitol and in the House of Representatives, which is the people's House.''


Woolsey said she thought the shirt Sheehan was wearing was from Veterans for Peace. Referring to the number of Americans killed in Iraq, the shirt read, "2,245 and how many more?''


Some other members were upset about Sheehan's arrest. "I'm still trying to find out why the president's Gestapo had to arrest Cindy Sheehan in the gallery. ... It shows he still has a thin skin,'' said Rep. Pete Stark, D-Fremont.


The President's gestapo, eh? Cindy Sheehan goes down to Venezuela, stands next to a communist, calls the President the world's "biggest terrorist" and the President gets criticized for her getting kicked out of the state of the union?


Please.


If anyone's tactics should be questioned it should be the Democrats, who attempted to disrupt the President's speech by sending in one of their clowns to do the dirty work.

Comments

Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

You’re using the old “two wrongs make a right” argument that you hear Mr. Limbaugh use over and over again. Please clean out your ears and THINK about what you’re saying.

Don, it has been Capitol policy to disallow sloganeering and protests within the Capitol building for decades now, far before Bush’s time.  Last night the policy was applied even-handedly.  People wearing offending t-shirts from both sides of the political spectrum were removed.

What part of that do you have a problem with?


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 1, 2006 at 08:02 am
Avatar for Don Myers

Rob & d:

You’re using the old “two wrongs make a right” argument that you hear Mr. Limbaugh use over and over again. Please clean out your ears and THINK about what you’re saying.

Thank you.

Don Myers on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 am
Avatar for d.narloch

A Hermit,

If Sheehan wants to go join her protesting group out on the street, she can where what ever shirt she wants. What about courtesy, respect, and honor words that many civil disobediants have erased from their dictionaries. There are rules in certain respectful places such as the capitol floor for a reason. When you break these rules, you shouldn’t be asked to comply, you should be escorted out immediately as they did with both women. There is a time and a place to let your voice, and actions heard, the capitol floor during any Presidents speech is not one of them.

d.narloch

d.narloch on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 am
Avatar for d.narloch

And of course we didnt hear anything on the news broadcast networks about Beverly Young, wife of Rep. C.W. Bill Young, who was also removed from the Speech for wearing a shirt that said “Support Our Troops-Defending Our Freedom.” Even though she wasn’t from the same camp as Sheehan, they wanted to be politically correct and kick both out for breaking the rules, rightfully so. My question, where was the media on that one?

d.narloch

d.narloch on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 am
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

You saw where another woman was asked to leave for wearing a shirt that was supportive of the military, right?

This had nothing to do with dissent and everything to do with disrupting a speech.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 am
Avatar for A Hermit

Yes, God forbid an American citizen should dare to express their disagreement with Dear Leader George W. Bush…

Is this really the America you want to live in? Where peoplc can be arrested for wearing teh wrong shirt?!

Ever read a history of Mao’s “Cultural Revolution?” America’s a long way from the excessess of the Red Guards, but between the demonization of University professors to this sort of thing it’s starting to sound awfully familiar…

A Hermit on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 am
Avatar for Gerald Rockower

I strongly disagree with the fact that people are thrown our and arrested in the house of representatives for wearing a Tee shirt that proclaimed their constitutional rights to free speech. They did not disrupt or cause any commotion in the chamber other than state their ideas with their Tee shirt emblems. I would certainly agree to their arrest onbly if they commited any disruptions during the State of the Union address.

Gerald Rockower on February 1, 2006 at 09:02 am
Avatar for King of Fools

There is a law that does not allow you to campaign within 50 feet of a polling place.  This law includes active campaigning (chanting, cheering, etc) as well as passive campaigning (wearing a political t-shirt or pin).

There is a similar law regarding demonstrations within the capitol building.  Both active and passive demonstrations are barred.  Same kind of law.  You don’t have to like it but it is not something that can be pinned on any individual or political party.

You could almost make a case that Sheehan was innocent by reason of ignorance of this law...except that she kept her ‘protest materials’ hidden until she was in the chambers.  (By the way: Wearing a T-shirt to an event like this? Extremely tacky even without a silly slogan.)

There is one loophole to this restriction...if you get enough votes in a legislative or senatorial race, you can demonstrate ‘til the cows come home.  (And they even show it on CSPAN)

King of Fools on February 1, 2006 at 09:02 am
Avatar for modern instances

What’s amazing to me is how much attention the righties are giving her, playing right into her hands.  If she hadn’t been arrested and removed, do you think there would have been as much attention as there is now?  Here we are, again talking about how Bush won’t talk to a woman who’s son was killed in Iraq, instead of talking about his speech.  Shooting fish in a barrel.

modern instances on February 1, 2006 at 09:03 am
Avatar for King of Fools

Why can’t anyone see this for what it is.  Sotu is a formal event.

If you go to a fancy restaurant without the proper attire, you don’t get in.

If you go to SOTU improperly attired, you don’t get in. If you hide your improper attire to get past the gate and then flaunt it once inside...expect to be removed.

King of Fools on February 1, 2006 at 09:03 am
Avatar for Dave

Don, it has been Capitol policy to disallow sloganeering (...) within the Capitol building for decades now

Wasn’t it just last year that the Republicans all painted their fingers purple for the SOTU? It’s tough to “sloganeer” more than that.
Dave on February 1, 2006 at 10:02 am
Avatar for A Hermit

of course we didnt hear anything on the news broadcast networks about Beverly Young, wife of Rep. C.W. Bill Young, who was also removed from the Speech for wearing a shirt that said “Support Our Troops-Defending Our Freedom.”

We didn’t hear about her because, unlike Sheehan, she wasn’t roughed up and arrested. Why the double standard?

Neither of them should have been removed, but if you’re going to argue that wearing a t-shirt with writing on it in a public buiding is an arrestable offence shouldn’t they BOTH have been arrested?

A Hermit on February 1, 2006 at 10:03 am
Avatar for michelle

sheehan knew what she was wearing was inappropiate or she wouldn’t have covered it up. she is a disgrace to her son and so are her supporters. the media need not give her a another minute.

michelle on February 1, 2006 at 11:02 am
Avatar for Mark in Orlando

I am a registered Democrat who until recently turned Republican. My decision to change had become so easy just watching this Democratic Party and seeing people like Cindy Sheehan make total fools of themselves and showing total disrespect for this country by their antics and especially cozying up with communist, Cindy who are going to cozy up to next, Bin Laden?

Mark in Orlando on February 1, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for likwidshoe

modern instances says, What’s amazing to me is how much attention the righties are giving her, playing right into her hands.

Perhaps. But it does serve a secondary purpose in the showing of who supports the degradation of civility. The pathetic excuses and moral relativism coming from the left shows me that Cindy Sheehan unwittingly plays into our hands.

likwidshoe on February 1, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for jcrue

Hermit said:

We didn’t hear about her because, unlike Sheehan, she wasn’t roughed up and arrested. Why the double standard?

There was no double standard, Hermit, one person did not respond to the requests to leave the other did in an amiable manner.

Guess which one was arrested for non-compliance and which one was not.

You can be taught, honest.

jcrue on February 1, 2006 at 01:02 pm
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Wasn’t it just last year that the Republicans all painted their fingers purple for the SOTU? It’s tough to “sloganeer” more than that.

The politicians are allowed.  Public demonstrations and such are not.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 1, 2006 at 01:03 pm
Avatar for MikeAdamson

To the surprise of nobody, the charges against Sheehan have been dropped and the Police have apologised. It seems that they couldn’t find a charge to lay against her. Oh well.

MikeAdamson on February 1, 2006 at 04:03 pm
Avatar for Carrick

MikeAdamson:

It seems that they couldn’t find a charge to lay against her.

That’s a bit naive on your part isn’t it?

In this type of civil disorder case, they rarely file charges…

Carrick on February 1, 2006 at 05:02 pm
Avatar for Carrick

MI:

modern instances says, What’s amazing to me is how much attention the righties are giving her, playing right into her hands.

Um… whose hands to you think this is playing into?  It’s a much bigger picture than Cindy.

Carrick on February 1, 2006 at 05:02 pm
Avatar for modern instances

Oh yes, that vast left-wing conspirancy.  How could I have been so foolish.

modern instances on February 1, 2006 at 05:03 pm
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Hey, all I can say is Democrats giving tickets to a woman who practically tongue-kissed a commie with a questionable civil rights record (right after she got done calling the President the “worst terrorist” in the world) doesn’t exactly reflect well on them.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 1, 2006 at 06:03 pm
Avatar for Dave

Democrats giving tickets to a woman

Democrat. Singular. Just one.

But continue demonizing the entire party.

Dave on February 1, 2006 at 08:03 pm
Avatar for MikeAdamson

Carrick said

That’s a bit naive on your part isn’t it?

Not really...I did say that the fact that charges weren’t layed comes as no surprise. What is a little surprising and unusual is that the police have apologised to both ladies. The bottom line is that Sheehan went looking for publicity and she got it so I guess she wins again.

MikeAdamson on February 2, 2006 at 05:02 am
Avatar for hugh kennsukkit

apparently there was nothing wrong with “sending in one of their clowns to do their dirty work”...........afterall “WE SCREWED UP” is an excuse this administration could use everyday for almost all of it’s policies......i mean just think of what KING GEORGE offered working people all across the country on tuesday night.......a chance to be able to “save their own money” for affordable health care...WOW whatta deal!!!!.......but not as good a deal as going to iraq with faulty equipment or coming home wounded and finding our you “have no coverage”....the solution is simple....when the poor or lower middle class have a child they should start saving immediately......so when another administration lies and sends them somewhere to die their family will have enough money saved for benefits.....UNLESS OF COURSE you crawled through a fence to get here or came hidden in the back of a truck......then you get FREE HEALTH CARE courtesy of the taxpayers of AZ,CA,NM,and TX!

hugh kennsukkit on February 2, 2006 at 05:02 am
Avatar for hugh kennsukkit

i believe their response was ‘WE SCREWED UP”........yup thats what it was......most of the country (61% who believe the current administration is perhaps the worst EVER but at least worst since SKIPPY in the mid 70’s)thought they were FINALLY hearing them ADMIT how bad a job they have done since being elected. but that wasn’t the case at all,they were simply admitting they “SCREWED UP” by removing cindy sheehan from the scene.

hugh kennsukkit on February 2, 2006 at 05:03 am
Avatar for King of Fools

61% who believe the current administration is perhaps the worst EVER but at least worst since SKIPPY in the mid 70’s

I don’t believe I have seen this poll.  Where did you get that number from...John Kerry?

King of Fools on February 2, 2006 at 06:03 am
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Democrat. Singular. Just one.

But continue demonizing the entire party.

Sorry I made a mistake, Davey.  Guess you never do.

But several Democrats did give tickets to Code Pink for the PResident’s innauguration.  Basically the same sort of thing.  So I’m still right.  Fake but accurate, and all that.

wink


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 3, 2006 at 09:02 pm
Avatar for Dave

All I can say is Republicans murdering the former Treasury Secretary doesn’t exactly reflect well on them. rolleyes

Dave on February 3, 2006 at 10:02 pm
Avatar for robert108

Dave: The modern Republican Party dates from Lincoln.  This is more irresponsible than usual from you.

robert108 on February 3, 2006 at 11:02 pm
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

It is not a lie, just worded badly.  I shouldn’t have used plurals.  Sometimes I make typos like that.  I guess you’re perfect.

This practice of “sending in the clowns,” though, is one the Democrats, several different members of that party, have used on more than one occassion with no condemnation from others within the party.  So I think it is fair to paint them all with this brush.  This is obviously a tactic the party as a whole agrees with, whether you want to see that or not.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 4, 2006 at 08:02 am
Avatar for Dave

"The Democrats?” When you write it like that you indict the entire party, for what I’m sure were the actions of a few. But at least that contains an element of truthiness.

Hey, all I can say is Democrats giving tickets to a woman who practically tongue-kissed a commie with a questionable civil rights record (right after she got done calling the President the “worst terrorist” in the world) doesn’t exactly reflect well on them.

But that’s just a boldfaced lie.

Dave on February 4, 2006 at 08:03 am
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Davey, the Democrats gave Code Pink tickets with in the last couple of years.  Not over a century ago.

Get a grip.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 4, 2006 at 08:03 am
Avatar for Dave

It is not a lie, just worded badly. I shouldn’t have used plurals. Sometimes I make typos like that.

Thsi is a typo. What you did was not. You didn’t accidentally use the plural “Democrats” in place of the singular “Democrat.” Here’s your sentence:

Hey, all I can say is Democrats giving tickets to a woman who practically tongue-kissed a commie with a questionable civil rights record (right after she got done calling the President the “worst terrorist” in the world) doesn’t exactly reflect well on them.

In order to use a singular in place of a plural, the sentence would have to read:

Hey, all I can say is a Democrat giving tickets to a woman who practically tongue-kissed a commie with a questionable civil rights record (right after she got done calling the President the “worst terrorist” in the world) doesn’t exactly reflect well on him or her.

No typo causes you to type “them” when you meant to type “him or her.” Want to know what does cause you to do that? A desire to take the actions of a single Democrat and spread it to all Democrats in the hopes of hurting the party.

Not a typo.

Dave on February 4, 2006 at 09:02 am
Rob
Rob
19421 comments
Send a private message

Badly worded.  I was using plural because I do think this is a tactic embraced by a lot, if not necesarily all, Democrats.  The Code Pink incident backs me up on that.

But continue to split hairs if you must.  I know it is what you do best.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 4, 2006 at 09:03 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.