Democrat Congress Backs Down, Gives Bush What He Wants On Defense And Iraq

Perhaps the surest sign that things are going well in Iraq is that the Democrat-controlled Congress, unlike previous years that didn’t even feature an impending election, isn’t interested in a fight with the President over the war.

WASHINGTON – Troops would get a pay raise in a defense bill that Congress sent President Bush on Saturday. Even before passage, lawmakers had backed away from an election-season showdown with the administration over Iraq.
Legislation approved by a voice vote in the Senate would increase pay by 3.9 percent, extend bonuses and provide money for family housing, tuition assistance and other programs.
The bill, which maps $612 billion in defense spending next year, shows how lawmakers would rather go home and campaign than wage a prolonged battle in Washington with Bush over Iraq policy.

Democrats don’t want a fight with Bush on the war because there’s no political advantage to such a scuffle any more. There is no denying that things are going well in Iraq now, and so by getting into high-profile fisticuffs over the war is only going to highlight for the public just how wrong the left has been about Iraq.
And that’s not something the liberals want in an election year. They’re better off trying to convince the public that the current financial fiasco is exclusively the fault of Republicans – something that’s not even a little bit true – than fighting their losing battle with Bush over Iraq.

Tags: , , , ,


«
»
  • http://massbackwards.blogspot.com/ Bruce

    Can someone do me a favor and give me the links to all the video footage showing Republicans opposing reform measures intended to keep these scumbag mortgage factories in check.

    If, as Obama claims, this is mess all on the shoulders of the Republicans, then there must be at least three or four buttloads of video out there to back up such claims, because I’ve already seen a buttload of video footage to the contrary, showing the Democrats in Congress standing up for their sugardaddies in “Big Mortgage”.

  • docdave

    Funny how the liberal Dems become more like conservative Repubs just before an election. Expect them to revert back to their liberal forms if they get reelected.

    You trust a liberal Dem at your own risk.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    House OKs Homeless Veterans Bill Amid Veto Threat

    The bill, which passed 412-9, also creates a job in the Department of Housing and Urban Development for someone to coordinate with Veterans Affairs on homelessness and make regular reports to Congress on the issue.

    The Senate version of the bill is sponsored by Democrat Barack Obama, the Illinois lawmaker who is the party’s presumptive presidential nominee.

    …The bill, he said, is “our opportunity to do something for those who have made it possible for us to live in the richest country in the world.”

    The Congressional Budget Office estimates the legislation would cost about $1.8 billion in the period from 2009-2013.

    He would like $700,000,000,000.00 for the banks, if you please.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Soldiers know who supports them, W. Washington, DC fabrications and mis-speak can not fool real men and women.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    WOOF – Bush has continually sought to undermine troops and veterans.

    What an asinine statement!

  • robert108

    Shoots your statement that things are going well in Iraq in the foot, doesn’t it!?

    No. A few scattered acts of terrorist vandalism doesn’t reverse all the economic and political progress there since we freed them from a murdering dictator.

  • Bat One

    If Democrats don’t have the stones to stand up to a “lame duck” president, one who they have opposed, belittled, sniped at, castigated and disparaged for 7 years and 8 months that he has been in office, what right thinking individual can serious believe that they would stand up to America’s real enemies? Phooey!

    Democrats, including most especially their national leaders and their current presidential and vice presidential candidates, are all talk… and damn little else!

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Why be a cheapskate? Triple their pay and hike the taxes on slackers to pay for it!

  • ollie-B

    Democrats don’t want a fight with Bush on the war because there’s no political advantage to such a scuffle any more. There is no denying that things are going well in Iraq now, and so by getting into high-profile fisticuffs over the war is only going to highlight for the public just how wrong the left has been about Iraq.

    Seems like I heard news today about numerous attacks around Baghdad on Sunday. Shoots your statement that things are going well in Iraq in the foot, doesn’t it!?

  • robert108

    The President just wants the Dems to strip out the pork they larded into the bill. He isn’t against veterans; the Dems are lying again. If the Dems really wanted to help the veterans, they would put up a pork-free bill without any of their crap in it.

  • WOOFX

    Bush has continually sought to undermine troops and veterans.

    provide a 3.9 percent pay increase for all service members, half a percentage point more than Bush sought.

    But Congress blocked an administration plan to raise the health insurance premiums paid by more than 1 million military retiree

    Never Did he Walk The Walk

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Poodle, the liberals are really good at playing the pander-to-the-troops game. Those clowns are so desperate to shore up their weaknesses on defense and national security that one-upping Bush no matter what he proposes for military pay and benefits is a given. Whatever the cost.

  • WOOFX

    bush threatens veterans veto

    bush threatens veto over increased benefits for disabled veterans by the Chicago Tribune – October 11, 2002

    May 27, 2008 … US Soldiers Losing Homes Rapidly, Bush Threatens GI Bill Veto … executive director of Veterans for Common Sense, a Washington-based …Bush Threatens Veto Over GI Bill Adds. May 02, 2008 … toward a veto confrontation as Bush said he would veto any attempt to add a popular veteran benefits …

    The Bush administration today threatened to a veto a House defense spending bill over a 3.5 percent pay raise for U.S. soldiers and a $40/month increase in benefits for military widows, among other provisions. The legislation passed the House today 397-27.

    ThinkProgress noted last night that the White House opposed the pay raise for troops:

    That’s the How GW Rolls

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development