Democrat Women Promote Cloying Attitude Of Feminine Superiority

a7c7c33a-d47c-4888-a395-f91ca9ef8ccd-heitkampmanual

There’s two kinds of feminism, I think.

One kind of feminist believe that women are entitled to all the same opportunities men are, but recognize that because men and women often approach their lives and careers very differently, unequal outcomes are inevitable. But the base belief is that women shouldn’t be treated as inferior, or less capable, simply because of their sex. As a brother, son, husband and a father to two growing little girls, this is the sort of feminist I aspire to be.

But there’s another kind of feminism. One that goes beyond equality of opportunity, in fact beyond even equality of outcome (which in and of itself is pretty objectionable) to the idea of feminine superiority.

We’ve seen it in our popular culture for some time now. In television and movies, and perhaps most obnoxiously in advertising, men are routinely depicted as little more than doofuses. More children for the smarter, more practical women of the world to take care of. But this attitude is growing beyond pop-culture (because, as the great Andrew Breitbart once put it, “politics is downstream from culture”) into the world of politics.

“We’re less on testosterone,” Democrat Senator Diane Feinstein said during an interview with Senate women on ABC News recently. “We don’t have the need to always be confrontational. And I think we’re problem solvers, and I think that’s what this country needs.”

Feinstein’s comments weren’t seen as all that controversial by most, but I shudder to think of what the consequences might be for a male politician or pundit suggesting that the Senate has too much estrogen these days.

North Dakota’s own Senator Heidi Heitkamp seems to have this same feminist chip on her shoulder. “We’re hoping that number [of female Senators] continues to grow because it’s critically important that we include everyone in the category of people who can serve this country,” Heitkamp told a Huffington Post reporter as she marched to the Senate chamber where she would be sworn in (and sexually harassed a little bit by the Vice President). “I think it will change the way things are done and I’m anxious to see those changes.”

There is definitely a sense of entitlement in these comments from politicians like Heitkamp and Feinstein. As though they were better, as if they were an improvement to the nation’s leadership, simply by being women.

That cloying sense of gender superiority wouldn’t be tolerated from a male, but for some reason it’s just fine coming from women.

Maybe it’s time to re-iterate that gender doesn’t matter. That being a woman, or being a man, doesn’t make you superior. Senator Feinstein, and Senator Heitkamp, aren’t being very good role models for other women.

As my little girls aspire to become whatever it is they’ll be in their lives, I don’t want them thinking that they’re entitled to special treatment because of their gender. I want them to believe that it’s their actions, their hard work and drive, that gets them ahead. They’re certainly not getting that message from some women right now.

Rob Port is the editor of SayAnythingBlog.com. In 2011 he was a finalist for the Watch Dog of the Year from the Sam Adams Alliance and winner of the Americans For Prosperity Award for Online Excellence. In 2013 the Washington Post named SAB one of the nation's top state-based political blogs, and named Rob one of the state's best political reporters. He writes a weekly column for several North Dakota newspapers, and also serves as a policy fellow for the North Dakota Policy Council.

Related posts

  • $8194357

    Alinsky said to take the “cause” and radicalize it…
    Flameing gay to radicle femminism it works for the leftist
    submissive satelite soviet system they use under the name of “the big tent”..

    • SusanBeehler

      Like your take on Jesus?!

      • $8194357

        Sad Susan…..
        If you “can’t” be devoted to Jesus?
        Your lost to secular deception.

        • SusanBeehler

          Sad you have twisted “his” image to YOUR beliefs not his teachings. You will know a Christian by his love.

          • Neiman

            Liberals of every stripe, being almost wholly unchristian, like to throw out that knowing a Christian by their love line, imposing of course their non-Christian, liberal, tolerant (damnable word) definition of love on Christians, which definition is NOT at all scriptural.

            Christ’s love is not saccharine sweet, it does not tolerate, excuse or ignore sin, it condemns sin because sin keeps believers from enjoying unbroken fellowship with Him due to guilt and it keeps non-believers from enjoying eternal life with Him. God is Love, it is His nature, but He is also a God of Justice and a Holy God, something liberals ignore because they want no guilt of sin interfering with their various lusts.

            Maybe this will enlighten you:

            However, the true gospel is much more than just “Jesus loves you.” God’s love for us means very little unless we first understand our broken condition as sinners before a holy God. Evil cannot dwell with God. He is holy, and He loves righteousness (Psalm 11:17). The Lord is not a God of hate, as Scripture tells us that “God is love” (1 John 4:8, 16).However, God is also perfectly true, righteous, and holy; therefore, He must hate evil, which is the opposite of everything God is.

            You may have heard that “God hates sin but loves the sinner.” People
            who use this phrase generally mean well, but it is an oversimplification of the truth and leads to misunderstanding. God does love sinners, as numerous passages clearly state (e.g., John 3:16; Romans 5:8; 1 John 4:10). Yet we also read verses like Psalm 5:5, which state that God hates not only wicked deeds, but also the people who do them. John 3:17 tells us that anyone who has not repented and received Christ stands condemned already under the holy anger of God against sin. Although He takes no pleasure in the death of the wicked (Ezekiel 33:10), the Lord must and will judge sinners, which includes everyone since all have sinned (Romans 3:23).

            Hopefully you can see how it is the hatred of God against our sin
            that makes His love toward us so incredibly spectacular. God has
            provided a way of salvation from sin and condemnation through His Son Jesus Christ, whom He gave to die in our place because of His amazing love.

            It’s important to realize that sin is not something to be played with. Like David, we ought to “hate the work of those who fall away” (Psalm 101:3). Sin is filthy to God and should disgust us. If you consider yourself a Christian but you are still fascinated by evil things, take time right now and search your heart in light of God’s holiness.

            http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2011/05/12/does-god-hate-anyone

            You are free to reject this, but you are rejecting God’s Word, as well. In Revelations it is Jesus that speaks positively of the Churches that hate sin and those that lie others into hell by encouraging them in sin.

            So, before you accuse 7point62 of twisting God’s image, may I suggest you examine your own heart, as while you point your accusing finger at 7point62, three more are pointing back at you saying it is you that are twisting God’s image for your own purposes, not according to God’s Word?

          • $8194357

            False prophets lead many down the wide path of secular destructions and they think we are headed in the wrong direction for swimming against the earthly current for the Scriptural Truth…
            Jesus said:
            “I am the Way the Truth and the Life”…
            Many will reject that for the politicaly correct acceptance of sin
            given out today as “religion”.

          • Neiman

            Susan, like many millions of people, honestly think they are Christian, mostly because their parents were, they grew up thinking they were and think they are relatively good, decent people. Yet, we know immediately that the Spirit of Christ is not in them at all or at least has been mostly ignored and their hearts hardened to His Voice, or they would know sin exists and hate it for its destructive power.

            The first and most telling feature of non-believers and carnal Christians (really practical atheists) is their appeals to Scripture to justify sin and the old appeal that God is Love, deliberately ignoring that He is also a Holy God that cannot tolerate sin and a God of Justice that will judge all sin as being sin.

            Their other appeal is that they feel they are good, better than other folk and God could not deny them Heaven, even if like Gay Bob they are admitted non-Christians. They thus deny grace and faith and make salvation a matter of works of the flesh, a flesh that God has already judged worthy of destruction.

          • SusanBeehler

            Your Quote: “We” know immediately that the Spirit of Christ is not in them”
            Maybe you are worshiping a different God; my God is the one who does the judging, I do not have the power to see into your heart or any heart, and he also tells me no matter how hard I try, I will be a sinner, because only one was without sin, Jesus Christ is the truth and light and the only way to salvation. Jesus hated sin but loved the sinner. Your posts along with 7point62 are condemning not redeeming. Jesus is redemption.

          • Neiman

            We are told to be fruit inspectors, to look at the spiritual fruit of people claiming Christianity. If a person says they are a Christian and do not admit their own desperate need for a savior and hate all their own sins and those of the world, how can that possibly be reflective of the Spirit of God?

            Jesus hates sin, but loves the sinner? “Unfortunately this is wrong, first I wish to point out it did not come from the bible, it came from St Augustine of Hippo, who was Bishop of Hippo 395AD

            There is a small element of truth in this thesis. God always *hates sin; he is invariably and implacably opposed to it. And it is true that God loves sinners: God ‘demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us’ (Rom. 5:8; cf. John 3:16). Nevertheless the thesis, with its simplistic antithesis between the personal sinner and sin in the abstract, is mistaken. The same apostle who declares that God’s wrath is revealed from heaven against ‘all the godlessness and wickedness of men’ (Rom. 1:18) also speaks of God’s wrath against individuals (Rom. 2:5); indeed we are all ‘by nature children of wrath’ (NRSV). The first fifty Psalms repeatedly describe the kinds of people on whom God’s wrath rests, not just the kinds of sin. Indeed, the language can move from God’s wrath to God’s hate and abhorrence: ‘The arrogant cannot stand in your presence; you hate all who do wrong. You destroy those who tell lies; bloodthirsty and deceitful men the Lord abhors’ (Ps. 5:5-6, NIV).

            Noneof this means that God’s wrath is arbitrary or whimsical. In
            Scripture, God’s wrath, however affective, is the willed and *righteous
            response of his holiness to sin. God’s holiness, like God’s love, is
            intrinsic to the very being of God; his wrath is not. To put the point
            another way: God has always been holy, as he has always been love; he has not always been wrathful. But where his holiness confronts the
            rebellion of his creatures, he must be wrathful (and the entire sweep of
            the Bible’s storyline insists he is), or his holiness is anemic. Yet
            for all that he is not less the God of love.”

            http://sbcvoices.com/god-hates-sin-but-loves-sinners-is-this-a-true-statement-not-entirely/

            As I said, you are good at using the platitudes of the secular world, but seem to have little understanding of the Nature and Word of God. These things suggest your not having His Spirit in you or that you are not devoted to Him as your all-in-all, your Lord as well as your savior and are leaning mostly to your flesh. I point these things out for your own contemplation, not as absolute fact, only my observations.

            Sin separates souls from God and He loves people, all sorts of people; and thus, must hate anything that keeps souls from His presence. For the Christian sin breaks fellowship for a season, for the unbeliever it separates them from Christ and His Salvation forever; both of which should cause you to hate sin and warn others of its consequences, because You Love Him and them.

          • SusanBeehler

            Fruit inspector and that comes from the Bible, this justifies how you call someone “Gay Bob”, truly a distortion. Christ is what keeps us from being separated from God by sin. Christ is our salvation and once we have accepted Christ we will never be separated from God. Hate is not of God. I think your focus on being a fruit inspector is keeping you in the grips of “sin” and not in the message of hope and faith.

          • Neiman

            A. I am not his pal, he keeps calling me his pal, which gives me the right to call him what I choose, that he may one day see that he cannot make the rules and insult people without being responded to in kind. But, it is interesting that you are defending a man that admits he is not a Christian and I know is possessed of demons. Birds of a feather?

            B. Your word game playing is noted. (1) In Genesis we learn that sin separated man from God and in Romans that the sins of the first Adam brought all to a place of death (separation from God). God is Holy and cannot have sin in His Presence, thus sin separates us from Him. https://www.dare2share.org/gospeljourney/ (2) It is by faith in Jesus that His Blood washes away our sins, as we by faith die to this world in Him. Read Galatians two: 19 “For through the law I died to the law so that I might live for God. 20 I have been crucified with Christ and I no longer live, but Christ lives in me. The life I now live in the body, I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. 21 I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing!”

            I realize God’s Word is not your ultimate authority, but sin does separate us from God and we are only brought near by faith in Jesus as our Savior and by repentance. I showed you from God’s Word that He hates sin and some sinners, but you say He has not any hate, so in His Word He lied to us?

            Matthew 7:16 “By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?”

            James 3:12 “My brothers, can a fig tree bear olives, or a grapevine bear figs? Neither can a salt spring produce fresh water.”

            Oh, but you say pay no attention to the fruits (words/actions) of those claiming to be Christians, so you are greater than God’s Word?

            I notice you don’t even take time to read what I offer from God’s Word so this is pointless. If you love God, then abide (live in) by His Word.

          • $8194357

            The Truth is not in him.
            It is obvious to those who have recieved Salvation.
            May it still yet come?
            Only Jesus knows..
            For I was once like him
            in my denile and excuses before Grace
            came to me and I said yes to it…

          • mickey_moussaoui

            A christian would chose to pray for those who suffer from same sex attraction. Accepting same sex attraction is not biblical. ( I’m just being factual, don’t attack the messenger)

          • SusanBeehler

            I will pray for you

          • mickey_moussaoui

            lol, thanks but I like girls

          • SusanBeehler

            What exact “sin” are you and 7point62 trying to point out to me?

            Because from most of your posts I sense you are very fearful, lack faith and like to attack people. People with guns, can kill easily and I believe killing is sinful both of you love your guns, to the extent you would not want anything to “infringe” on them, even one of God’s commandments.

          • camsaure

            He who is without a sword, let him sell his garment to get one.

          • $8194357

            My fearfulness is your false perception Susan.

          • Neiman

            Funny thing is they accuse me of killing people and yet, since I left the Marines and a couple of years as a police office, I have never owned a gun. Yet, they never say anything about the over 55 million babies that liberals have murdered in the womb, strange that.

          • $8194357

            I never killed anyone either.
            But I own multiple fire arms…
            Funny how that works, huh.
            Fear is on the unsaved and the left.

          • $8194357

            You started this discussion off with me as saying my Faith was a “radicalization” of Christianity. I have since provided you with many Scriptural excamples of the “need” for a personal “Christ centered” relationship with HIm…

            Radical?

            Then is not the 12 disicples being martyred for this same messege
            a “radical” faith?

            Even in the Old Testement “Devotion” to God was
            kind of ‘radical’, huh?

            Psalm 91
            New King James Version (NKJV)
            Safety of Abiding in the Presence of God

            1 He who dwells in the secret place of the Most High
            Shall abide under the shadow of the Almighty.
            2 I will say of the Lord,
            “He is my refuge and my fortress;
            My God, in Him I will trust.”

            3 Surely He shall deliver you from the snare of the fowler
            And from the perilous pestilence.
            4 He shall cover you with His feathers,
            And under His wings you shall take refuge;
            His truth shall be your shield and buckler.

            5 You shall not be afraid of the terror by night,
            Nor of the arrow that flies by day,
            6 Nor of the pestilence that walks in darkness,
            Nor of the destruction that lays waste at noonday.

            7 A thousand may fall at your side,
            And ten thousand at your right hand;
            But it shall not come near you.
            8 Only with your eyes shall you look,
            And see the reward of the wicked.

            9 Because you have made the Lord, who is my refuge,
            Even the Most High, your dwelling place,
            10 No evil shall befall you,
            Nor shall any plague come near your dwelling;

            11 For He shall give His angels charge over you,
            To keep you in all your ways.
            12 In their hands they shall bear you up,
            Lest you dash your foot against a stone.

            13 You shall tread upon the lion and the cobra,
            The young lion and the serpent you shall trample underfoot.

            14 “Because he has set his love upon Me,
            therefore I will deliver him;I will set him on high,
            because he has known My name.

            15 He shall call upon Me, and I will answer him;
            I will be with him in trouble;
            I will deliver him and honor him.
            16 With long life I will satisfy him,
            And show him My salvation.”

            “AND SHOW HIM MY SALVATION”
            How radical is that?

          • $8194357

            Scripture condems the soul of man to bring about repentence.
            Acceptance of a sinful nature as Godly, ‘is’ deception.
            Life altering and changing “Grace” comes to those who accept Christ in the heart…All else is a false hope given by secular ideology and the devils perversion of Gods Saving Grace and Salvation..
            A Salvation Gospel preached by all of the diciples who as in Galations said the social gospel of works were to come after Salvation..
            A “Christ centered” life you just told me was Alinsky radical…

          • $8194357

            (Your posts along with 7point62 are condemning
            not redeeming. Jesus is redemption)
            Does redemtion come before Salvation?
            Not in my Bible..
            So if your condemned by “Scripture”?
            Maybe you need Saving Grace as your “redemtion”?

          • Matthew Hawkins

            You are one of those millions of people who honestly think you are Christian.

            90% of your views are antithetical to Christianity. Your interpretation of scripture is usually wrong.

            You worship a false god because you don’t understand Jesus.

          • Neiman

            Fair enough – now step up to the plate, using only the Bible, prove your accusations against me with God’s Word. Show me some examples of how my views are antithetical to Christianity.

            Since I confess the Jesus of the Bible as my only Savior and Lord, I would be fascinated how you twist that into my worshipping a false god.

            See, any yahoo can say those things because they disagree with me, but unless you can, as I do, use Scripture to prove your claims, with me having a chance to respond, then it is just so much spitting into the wind.

            Now if you do not accept this challenge you are either a coward, a liar of both. If I am in error I want to know.

            First though, are you willing to confess here and now that Jesus is your only Savior and your absolute Lord? If not, then you are not a Christian and are wasting my time.

          • Matthew Hawkins

            “Blessed are the poor.”

          • Neiman

            Yes, I agree, what is your point?

            No confession of faith from you? Does that mean you are NOT a Christian and thus unqualified to comment?

          • Matthew Hawkins

            The main reason you aren’t Christian is because Christianity is not hate.

            You hate people.

          • $8194357

            He hates sin and sins deceptions……
            Just a “slight” difference to one who has come to the understanding
            of what real Salvation is and one who hasn’t…

          • Matthew Hawkins

            No, he hates people.

            He insults people he disagrees with by calling the gay. I justifies him hating them.

            That is hatred of the person, not the sin.

          • $8194357

            How did you come to this “judgement” Matt?
            Through prayerful reflection and the Words conformation?
            Or because he offended your politically correct worldly senses?

          • mickey_moussaoui

            …and you LOVE him by attacking his faith? Is that it mr prosecutor?
            You’re such an irony it’s funny. I’m no lawyer but I could beat you in court

          • Matthew Hawkins

            Why is Neiman the only one who can attack other’s faith?

          • $8194357

            I guess he isn’t since I get accused of it as well..
            Scriptual Truths not understood are rejected by most as hate..
            Funny how satan has the lost or blind doing that, huh..

          • mickey_moussaoui

            You called someone a non christian. Who elevated you to that position of authority?

          • Neiman

            So, the conclusion is –

            > You have no biblical argument.
            > You cannot confess Jesus as your Savior and Lord.
            > You were either lying or a coward and could not present any facts.
            > You are operating on non-Christian emotion.
            > You don’t even have a biblical definition of love to offer.
            > You just use the word hate, not knowing the biblical definition.

            In other words you were just making a false accusation, pretending to have something to say, but were just acting childish.

            I don’t mind being corrected by another Christian or at least an adult that has sound reasons for their accusations, but you are a big failure in every department. I am disappointed in you and you should be ashamed to make false accusations.

          • $8194357

            Social justice works gospel..
            A ‘different” gospel than Preached by Jesus and His Disciples..
            Paul said it this way:
            “I preach Christ and Christ crucified,
            lest I empty the cross of its power”.
            The “REVELATION” of ones personal need of Salvation
            and the One and Only source from wence it comes….
            Any other Gospel is a false gospel according to Galations 1:6-12
            and many other references…
            A gay or any other political correct social gospel is a ‘new’
            therefore “FALSE” gospel.
            Gospel literally means “TRUTH”
            The Gospel “Truth” of Christ………

          • $8194357

            (You worship a false god because you don’t understand Jesus.)
            God is Spirit and desires those true worshippers to worship Him in Spirit and in Truth….JESUS SAID THAT…
            The Truth is that the Word and the Spirit will be in one accord…
            If the Scripture is wrong to you?
            Then your guiding spirit is wrong….
            For the two will be of one accord and reveal sins deceptions and lies.

          • mickey_moussaoui

            Aren’t you a law student? And you preach about Jesus. heh, now that’s funny.

          • $8194357

            Sins deceptions are strong in the world today as the end times come in a hurry to conclusion..When “christians” say Scripture is hateful?
            It must mean the so called christian is in need of some True Enlightenment and get rid of the worlds “FALSE enlightenment”, IMHO

          • SusanBeehler

            In stating “you will know a Christian by his love”, comes from one of my favorite songs I sang in choir at a “Christian” church before I had ever even heard of the word “liberal”. Referring to me as a liberal because I quote a song is twisting my words and distorting what you think is my faith, both you and 7point62 are very judgemental. My point is the manner you are trying to portray your Christian faith is not very loving at all, and that is my point “you will know a Christian by his love” for fellow people, love for life. I suggest you examine your heart and why you feel the need to label me a “liberal” . Christ love is sweet because he offers his love to everyone even “liberal”, even murderers, whereas 7point62 seems to act as if he is in charge of separating the sheep and the goats. Stop hiding behind your religion and your interpertation of scripture, your quoting of scripture to excuse your behavior.

          • Neiman

            I showed you from God’s Word that He defines Love differently than you, He loves everyone, He wants “whosoever will” (most blessed word – whosoever) to be saved; but that requires: Conviction, being convinced in your heart you are deserving of eternity in hell. Repentance, asking God, by His Grace, to forgive all your sins; past, present and future. Conversion, asking Jesus to be your Savior and Lord. That is salvation, not your good works.

            What is love in God’s economy? Good question. Example: A man has a fatal disease, but he does not know it. If told about it, he is in denial and gets angry, attacking the person telling him of the disease and refusing to discuss the treatment needed to heal him and save his life. Worldly Man does not want to offend the sick fellow and withholds the truth and even he gets angry at anyone that will tell the sick man the truth, he doesn’t think it is loving to offend him. Spiritual Man boldly tells him he has a disease that will kill him, even suffering vicious attacks and hatred from the sick man and his friends for his boldness; but he is not deterred, he tells the man what he must do to get well and save his life. Now, you and most folk would say Worldly Man loves the sick guy, because he is sensitive and will not offend him and will fight others that may offend him with the truth. You call Spiritual Man hateful because he wants the man to know the truth, be healed and live even if the sick man and his friends are offended, even if he is attacked and beaten for his efforts. Replace the word “disease” with “sin,” the treatment repentance and the cure, life in Christ and any Christian will see that it is Spiritual Man that truly loves the sick man and Worldly Man that in truth hates the sick man.

            Did you know John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul, Peter and all the Apostles were murdered for speaking against sin and pointing people to Jesus as the only cure? They were not hated and killed because they did not offend people, because they were saccharine sweet and appeared kind, who would get killed foo such attitudes? Preaching the Gospel, which demands speaking out boldly against sin and calling people to repentance is a thankless job. The world and even many millions falsely calling themselves Christians will hate any such people. I was struck by the fact that after Peter and the Apostles were filled with the Spirit, two things happened: (a) Peter preached Repentance. b) Soon after the Jewish leaders plotted to kill him. Sound familiar here?

            I know it seems to people of the world unloving to speak out against sin, but when the heart is on saving souls, it is only the Love of God that can be in operation here, as Satan will not cast out Satan. If you had His Spirit, you would share His hatred of sin that separates souls from Him, tell people they are being separated from God by sin and cal them to repentance and faith in Jesus.

          • $8194357

            Your lack of understanding is your judge…
            I agree with you on one point…
            Its not what ya know,
            but Who you know,
            as my Holy Bible told me so…
            Revelation of the need of Salvation,
            not religion and doctrinal works.
            I qoute Scripture and you say I am Judgemental..
            You qoute your feelings and say I am bitter and hateful..
            I hate no one but the Scripture I qoute makes you believe or
            “feel” I do…Who has the problem with Gods Word?

          • Neiman

            Exactly, it is not you they hate, it is God’s Word. I too use God’s Word and they get angry and make accusations of hatred, it is because the Truth convicts them.

          • $8194357

            Rejecting the Law of God is
            rejecting the Grace of God as well..IMHO
            Jesus:
            The completion of but not
            the deletion of Gods Law…

          • $8194357

            You confuse IMO, the milk of the Word for infants in the Gospel..
            I didn;t have much time to suckle the milk of the word as I came to Christ late and needed to Grow up into the meat of the Gospel in a hurry…
            Yes…Yes…Yess..God loves His creation…
            The Milk of the Word…God is Love and Loves all so much he gave us Christ…John 3:16
            “For God so loved the world ect//ect…
            Growing in Faith and moving to discipleship we need to learn to feed on the meat of the Gospel as adults who are no longer on the strict diet of milk….
            Sin is the mortal/imortal enemy of Gods creation
            seperating it from Him…Only by Grace can we recieve the free
            Gift Christ purchased for us by His obidiance…But as we grow in the Lord we need to come to the understanding not all or everything will recieve and accept it….Those on the Milk as did I for a short while thought that was “hateful” of God or those who shared this “TRUTH”…But like I said…I needed to grow up quickly to understand generational sins keep families in bondage to it and came to “Beleive” later in life than most….

            If you are advanced in years with your faith and still only understand the milk of the child….You’ve stunted your growth from believer to discipleship and I as well understand that, as I have tried hard for along time to not share this Truth because I wanted folks to like me and didn’t understand that My Faith was to grow for HIS purpose and not my own, or the worlds acceptance..

            If your works are unto men…
            They are carnel and not unto Christ…
            Mature meat for the mature Christian…

            A closeted prayer warrior may eat the meat while only knowing the love and milk but when one is called to condem sins deception openly….It gets a little clearer what Jesus said and ment when He said :
            “If they hate you for me, you are Blessed
            because they hated me first”…

          • SusanBeehler

            You do not have to write so many words because I am not reading them.

          • $8194357

            Your loss.
            If you don’t comment to me and it is your widh I don’t comment to you it is an easy fix..

          • SusanBeehler

            It is my “widh”

          • $8194357

            Wish…
            so sorry…Drama queen..

          • $8194357

            Next thing you will be saying I’m stalking you huh…

          • $8194357

            10X lady…
            Just ignore my posts and I will do like wise….
            By the way…I never post under any other name…
            But never mind…anything I do would only fall on deaf ears anyway..
            God Bless and take care now, Hear?

          • badlands4

            Apparently you are since you just made a spelling correction

          • SusanBeehler

            Huh? 7point62 is also badlands4 apparently

          • badlands4

            You told 7point62 that he needn’t waste his time writing so many words because you were not reading them. According to the time stamped on your post that was 42 minutes ago. He made another comment to you where he mispronounced, what I assume was “wish”. (37minutes ago) You then typed out “it is my widh”, mocking his spelling 31 mins ago. If you typed out you were not reading his posts 42 mins ago and then responded 31 mins ago to a post he made 37mins ago, then you were clearly reading his posts…shrug

            If my posts are not coming in order, then I apologize for my above post to you.

            If you would like to correct my grammar, punctuation and/or spelling, knock yourself out. I don’t normally play the grammar game(mainly because I, myself type very fast and am sloppy with my grammar and punctuation while doing it ) but it seems to be important for you to do, so go to town. I have no doubt there will be grammar mistakes you can call me out on.

            I have read most of your posts and it seems like you have a split personality when it comes to your posts on the very same thread. Above you said it was for God to judge and then just a few posts down, and in other topics, you seem to have undertaken the position of Judger in Chief. I had thought to try and have a conversation with you about a few topics sprouting up from posts you have made but I am thinking there is little point in that, so this is it for us. Enjoy your evening.

          • SusanBeehler

            I don’t live in the same time zone you do, I guess, and lengthy posts I rarely read to the bottom; what I could have said to you know who. This is a blog and people who do not use their real names I play the blog game with them, parrot back what they post to me. If you see the “split personality” I am “mirroring” back what is said, so they must be “split” too. Anyone can post on this blog under mutiple names and I respond not reading the blog as the post appears but through an instant message or email I receive. Time stamps I don’t receive. In my time zone it appeared you and 7point62 were one in the same.

          • Onslaught1066

            Me thinks the “Lardy” doth protest too much.

          • $8194357

            Those little assumptions and perceptions you don’t see in your self, huh..

          • $8194357

            No..
            she’s a fine lady I met a while back.
            We don’t agree on everything either,
            but I have come to understand she is a fine lady..

          • $8194357

            Hey badlands..
            My sincere desire to share the mature Truth given me has once again got the hackles of folks up…Sorry your tied up in my mess.
            Hope the holidays were good for you and yours…

          • $8194357

            Well then…

            Here is a little video from one of your “ideoligical” blood brothers.

            http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=v1W8I8uoVPo

          • $8194357

            The Narrow Gate……….Narrow is the Way…..
            False the prophet who leads
            on the wide path to destruction

            Well ‘one’ of us following the wide gate of the secular world to destruction perhaps may be wrong as to what His intent was…
            To Save people ‘out” of sin and deception to “go and sin no more'”.

            Matthew 7:9-15
            New King James Version (NKJV)

            9 Or what man is there among you who,
            if his son asks for bread, will give him a stone?
            10 Or if he asks for a fish, will he give him a serpent?
            11 If you then, being evil,
            know how to give good gifts to your children,
            how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good
            things to those who ask Him!
            12 Therefore,
            whatever you want men to do to you,
            do also to them, for this is the Law and the Prophets.

            The Narrow Way

            13 “Enter by the narrow gate;
            for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads
            to destruction, and there are many who go in by it.
            14 Because narrow is the gate
            and difficult is the way which leads to life,
            and there are few who find it.

            You Will Know Them by Their Fruits

            15 “Beware of false prophets,
            who come to you in sheep’s clothing,
            but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.

          • $8194357

            Marxist political correct false moral high ground..
            Secular and satanic in origin..

            Leftists are killers while cloaking themselves in “good intentions.”
            The road to hell is paved …..

            Watch tne video and see for yourself..
            communists think tanks of old laid the
            pattern down for moral deconstruction
            of a western Judeo/Christian culture
            based on Marxist critical therory and lies…

            http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2009/07/history-of-political-correctness.html

            Political Correctness with classical Marxism
            the parallels are very obvious.

            First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies.
            The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.

            Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian
            because the essence of an ideology
            (I would note that conservatism correctly understood,
            is not an ideology)
            is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history.

            People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.

            Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness,
            like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production.
            Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness,
            says that all history is determined by power,
            by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc.,
            have power over which other groups.
            Nothing else matters.
            All literature, indeed, is about that.
            Everything in the past is about that one thing.

            Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups,
            i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good,
            and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil.

            In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women,
            (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals.

            These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do.
            Similarly,
            white males are determined automatically to be evil,
            thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in
            economic Marxism.

            Fourth,
            both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation.
            When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property.
            (like taxes for the less fortunate and gun consfiscation?
            forced on folks no matter what their believes…7.62)
            Similarly,
            when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favor of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated.
            And indeed,
            affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by,
            say, Hispanics or women.
            So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.

          • $8194357

            You see there is the worlds ‘social gospel’.
            And then there is the real Gospel of Salvation
            and Revealed Truth.

            If it is ‘new’ it is not True….

            Galations 1:6-12

            Only One Gospel

            6 I marvel that you are turning away so soon from Him who called you in the grace of Christ, to a different gospel,
            7 which is not another; but there are some who trouble you and want to pervert the gospel of Christ.
            8 But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.
            9 As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed.

            10 For do I now persuade men, or God?
            Or do I seek to please men?
            For if I still pleased men,
            I would not be a bondservant of Christ.

            Call to Apostleship

            11 But I make known to you, brethren,
            that the gospel which was preached by me
            is not according to man.
            12 For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it,
            but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ.

            TRUTH not human ideology or emotion…….

      • $8194357

        Hope this isn’t “to radicle” for your religous pallet to feed on.

        “[Living Before God Our Father]
        Therefore gird up the loins of your mind,
        be sober, and rest your hope fully upon the grace
        (that is to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ;” )
        1 Peter 1:13
        NKJV

  • kevindf

    Hidey will be on TV with George Stepennalphgas and Big Candy tomorrow.

    • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

      Why?

      She won a race to the bottom ,barely holding a Senate seat the Dems had held since 1960.

      She’s a back bencher.

      • Roy_Bean

        Why? You answered this question yourself back in August.

        http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/americas-ugly-obsession-with-celebrity/

        They invent politicians who serve their purposes. George Snuffeluppagus invented the war on women and no doubt he will invent Heidi as some kind of genius who can solve the problems of the world.

      • spud

        She defeated a candidate who thought he was entitled to senate seat. We are all entitled to our opinions of this senate campaign but we should never forget she was out worked her opponent and even today in another blog we still see he can’t put blame on real reason he lost his arrogant lousy campaign. Rob it is true they have had this seat since 1960 but look at your past writings on this you and your conservative buddies never gave her a chance with many of them thinking she was a has been. Maybe it was not only Rick Berg but entire North Dakota Republican party that got a slap in the face from North Dakota voter’s for there arrogant smug attitude.

        • spud

          She outworked Rick Berg is what should have been said.

          • yy4u2

            Or it could just be that she said one thing but will do another. Time will tell (history has proven her a liar), but I won’t hold my breath.

          • $8194357

            They eat shit sandwiches with smiles and expect
            us to want to take a bite too…

          • SusanBeehler

            Jesus loves your language?

          • $8194357

            My aren’t we the false moralality queen…
            Bovine fecal sandwich for you hardline
            moral protectors of the Faith…

          • SusanBeehler

            Jesus appreciates your language?

          • $8194357

            Did I ever once say to you or anyone, I am perfect, Susan..
            You expect perfection from me. but not your self?
            If you were my Holy Spirit, I may repent for my indisgression that offended you, but since your not, Put your big girl underware on and deal with it, Queen of the false equivilancey…

          • $8194357

            Typical hypocrit..
            condem me about shit sanwiches and support the leftist agendas of
            genocide and homosexuality….

          • SusanBeehler

            I don’t support genocide or homosexuality; you have a foul mouth. Even if you as a man think one sin is worse then another ask your Savior what he has to say about sin, any sin.

          • Neiman

            It is to be sure that God hates, get that, hates all sin, big or small, as He said to break His Law at any point is to Him the same as breaking them all. Perfection is the divine standard and he calls for His children to be absolutely perfect. Perfect means without the most microscopic pin point of sin for which we are guilty, did you know that?

            Matthew 5:48 “Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.”

            Are you sinless and perfect Susan? I am, are you? I will get to homosexuality in a moment, but you need to understand that the only route to perfection is to by faith die with Christ and be born again in Christ, wherein His perfect, holy life is credited to our account. In spirit we are therefore perfect, while in this world and in the flesh, the flesh will sin and thank God we have an advocate in Jesus that before the Father says we are in Him and those sins are covered. Not that He takes a vacation and does not discipline us as a good, loving father.

            Now, it is true that beyond idolatry which He hates, what other specific sin caused God to destroy two cities? What other sin did He focus on like homosexuality in Romans One? He condemns homosexuality elsewhere as well, So, this sin is particularly hateful to Him, because of its destructive nature to the souls of men/women in that lifestyle, their partners, children, family, friends and society as a whole. It is the ultimate idolatry, finding only the body of their own gender attractive for sexual purposes. So, while you are right he hates all sin, we cannot discount His particular hatred of homosexuality.

            Nonetheless, if repented and the gay thinking person accept Jesus as Savior and Lord; they can be saved and by faith rescued from those lustful feelings. They are not gay Christians, just Christians plagued by the sin of homosexuality, which they are to cease by His power. If they do not see it as sin, they were not born again of His Spirit and are lost.

          • $8194357

            Yup…
            Thats what my Bible says as well…
            My carnal mans sins are washed away
            by the blood of Christ and I “try” not to sin,
            but that old man dies hard some days, huh…

          • Onslaught1066

            Then, perhaps, you should stop being a Homicidal Genital.

          • $8194357

            shit shit shit…..
            Now you and Whoopie have the needed reason to support Hitler,
            Mao, Pol Pot, Lennin, Stalin ect…ect…ect..ideological blood brothers
            for the two of you to come take the evil conservitive “MAN’s”
            Constitutional protected gun rights away because according to
            “your feelings” we don’t need them…
            Yes, hypocrit will fit nicely

          • SusanBeehler

            hypocrit

          • $8194357

            I thought you made a “widh” to have a cease fire?
            hypocrit…………

      • Dakotacyr

        Waaaa, waaaa, call the waaaammmbulance!

        • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

          Another mature, insightful comment from Dakota.

          Seriously, never stop commenting here. You make conservatives look good.

          • http://realitybasedbob.sayanythingblog.com/ realitybasedbob

            I think he was quoting poof, right there, rube.

  • Matthew

    Your inconsistencies are staggering. First you state that men and women often “approach their lives and careers very differently.” But than you are offending when they suggest that their approach to governance would be different.

    If you are really believe that men and women approach their lives differently why are you offended when a woman senator suggests that over 50% of the population should be represented by more than 20% of the Senate? She wasn’t suggesting they be appointed. She was speaking to the fact that more women are becoming active in politics and are being elected.

    You paternalism is showing which belies your assertion that somebody would be overly offended if their was a suggestion that there was too much estrogen in the Senate. This article strongly implies that this is your belief.

    • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

      Your inconsistencies are staggering. First you state that men and women often “approach their lives and careers very differently.” But than you are offending when they suggest that their approach to governance would be different.

      It’s not that they suggest their approach would be different. It’s that they suggest their approach would be better.

      If you are really believe that men and women approach their lives differently why are you offended when a woman senator suggests that over 50% of the population should be represented by more than 20% of the Senate?

      I think Americans should vote for who they think the best candidate is, and I think gender doesn’t matter.

      Heitkamp, Feinstein and, clearly, you feel differently. I think that’s shameful.

      • Matthew Hawkins

        Everybody thinks their approach is better or it wouldn’t be their approach.
        Nobody is proposing that women be appointed. That would be an entitlement. She was clearly happy that more women are being elected.
        If you really think that gender has no roll in determining the ability of a Senator, than you have to come to the conclusion that a vast pool of qualified candidates is being ignored. Wouldn’t the Senate be a better body if we took advantage of all qualified candidates?

        • mickey_moussaoui

          “That would be an entitlement.”….and you don’t think that actually happens???
          lol

          • Matthew Hawkins

            I don’t think it is happening in the Senate, which is what we are talking about.

          • mickey_moussaoui

            The Senate is hardly pure. Politics is a game of chess. Not all pieces are Knights.

        • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

          If you really think that gender has no roll in determining the ability of a Senator, than you have to come to the conclusion that a vast pool of qualified candidates is being ignored.

          That’s not even coherent.

          I don’t think gender matters. Clearly, you do. I think that’s kind of sad.

      • SusanBeehler

        “We’re hoping that number [of female Senators] continues to grow because it’s critically important that we include everyone in the category of people who can serve this country,”

        Where is the word “better” in the statement above or below

        “I think it will change the way things are done and I’m anxious to see those changes.”

        Seeing these statements as someone man or woman is saying they are “better”? It might be your perception or your insecurities as a PERSON leaving you with this perception. Clearly where do you see “better”?

        As a woman and parent I want my sons and my daughters to know the real world where many times women may be treated differently than men in any kind of situation especially areas where more men tend to gather, work or play. It is how you respond and be aware there is MEN who will call women names, comment on their physical appearance, or will do many things they would never ever do or say to their own mother or to other men. When was the last time on a blog you see some guy post about what a man is wearing or how he is aging or his hair or how his shirt or pants fit? It doesn’t happen very often, yet men state things like this frequently for women in politics. Women are different but it does not mean we are any less or any better; although anyone a man or a woman may do some things better than others, it is all matter of perception. People coming from similar experiences may be able to understand and relate to people from similar experiences, being a woman is an experience which gives women the ability to understand many things which make women different than men; something we do need in Congress. Would something you do with your guy friends be as much fun for you with a room full of women? The experience would be different, not better or worse; different. Your idea of “fun” may end up being redefined if the players change. Perception, Rob, perception

        • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

          So you don’t think Heitkamp believes more women in the Senate is better?

          Because that’s the obvious meaning of Heitkamp’s words, and I find them objectionable.

          Gender shouldn’t matter.

          • Matthew Hawkins

            Statistacally you are not making any sense. If you really think that gender shouldn’t matter, why are you ok with only 20 US senators being women?

            if you really think that men and women are equally qualified to be Senators than how are you OK with ignoring a pool of qualified candidates? If gender doesn’t matter than the make up of the Senate should generally represent the make up of the populace.

            I do think that more women in the Senate would be better because I think that a vast pool of candidates is being marginalized because of our culture.

          • mickey_moussaoui

            IMO you want to create an issue that was never implied. I suspect you wouldn’t even take interest if the senator in question were a Republican.

          • Bat One

            If gender doesn’t matter than the make up of the Senate should generally represent the make up of the populace.

            Simplistic nonsense! Senators aren’t elected because they are men or because they are women. And of course, federally mandated quotas are on their way out in a number of areas of American life. As they should be.

          • SusanBeehler

            I believe she is saying it is good, not better to have more representation of woman in congress. Gender shouldn’t matter, but in the real world it still does matter to some, just like being black or native american or whatever. Sorry you find her words objectionable, she can’t please everyone.

          • $8194357

            FORWARD comrade Beehler….

          • $8194357

            The matriarchail majority concensus steering committe above the patriarchail rule of law…Emotions based ever changing the meaning of the rule of law….This IS what PC cultural terrorism was all about…
            To usurpt Judeo/Christian Biblical/Constitutional Rule of Law equality
            and replace it with protected class staus above the general rule of law.
            Matriarchail rule was more acceptting of communist social change…

        • $8194357

          (. Perception, Rob, perception)
          You mean like ‘your’ perception of me
          because of the Scripture I quote?

          • SusanBeehler

            I was talking to Rob, I have no clue who you are, what you represent and perceive you as “chaos” and a made up character which calls themselves 7point62, like I have said in a previous post even Satan knows how to quote scripture. You dance around truth and confound with babblings and hid behind a fictional character 7point62.

          • $8194357

            Oh Susan….
            If ya don’t want to talk to me don’t comment on my posts…
            You want it both ways like most folks do..
            God Bless and Keep ya now, Hear?

          • SusanBeehler

            We were talking?

          • $8194357

            No you were accusing…
            Funny…Thats what lucifer does…

      • mickey_moussaoui

        The term “cloying sense of gender superiority” is a perfect description to frame the difference.
        Women who don’t play that game ultimately get more respect from both men and women.

    • $8194357

      Alot of Dr. Phils earthy carnel understanding in your rant there Matt…
      Not much Spiritual Truth tho….

  • mickey_moussaoui

    I’ve know women in business who take advantage of affirmative action legalities to advance their careers. It usually is easy for them when they are in male dominated
    industries like those that incorporate engineers for example (a male dominated
    field).

    These women fill token positions of title and they generally get special
    dispensation for their position within the higharchy. A smart CEO will insulate themselves but cave to the legalities just the same. These types of women usually hold a grudge towards men and will use their authority to prove a point. In reality they are no different than the “good old boys” from the past with their gender driven bias. It’s the same old crap sandwich in a different bread. Politics are everywhere.

    • Matthew Hawkins

      Wow, are you bitter.

      • mickey_moussaoui

        It’s politics in big business. large corporations have more in common with the Gilbert cartoon than many people actually realize. Ask yourself why the Obama regime only plays the “war against women” theme when in reality women in his administration play “second fiddle” to the boys. He has fewer women in power positions than Bush did. But he sells it like he’s Mr. Equal Opportunity. It’s all smoke up your butt. Ambassador Rice is a perfect example. She was a token and Obama used her. In a lot of ways, so is Hillary Clinton. Her ass is on the line for the Benghazi F’up. Where is Obama? Bottom line: The Clinton’s are not his equals. Pawns.
        If you don’t think politics doesn’t exist in business, then you never worked in a large corporation. It’s not the local hardware store. Why do you suppose they have so many lawyers on staff?

        • Matthew Hawkins

          And I am sure no man in an engineering firm has ever been promoted over a woman because of the Old Boys Network. If you really think women have an advantage in engineering firms or large corporations than you are an idiot.

          • http://sayanythingblog.com Rob

            It’s interesting that you mention engineering firms. I assume you bring that up because of the historical under representation of women in the STEM fields. But have you looked at the differences between the areas of study men and women choose in college?

            http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/shocker-boys-and-girls-are-different/

            Women tend to make different decisions about their careers. You would suggest that unequal outcomes are the result of bias. I would suggest that most of it is due to individuals making decisions.

          • Matthew Hawkins

            I bring up engineering for two reasons. One is because I believe MM is an engineer, though I could be wrong. Secondly because my dad was an engineer and it was my undergraduate before joining the army and forgetting everything I learned in undergraduate school and became a lawyer.

            I don’t believe that men are better at science and men than women. I believe culturally we steer men towards math and science and not women. My sister’s mother in law, a former teacher, continually tells my nieces that math is hard. It infuriates me because she is just setting up low expectations and giving them an excuse. High school math isn’t hard. Math isn’t hard until you are well past high school. If I had a nephew I am not sure she would tell him math is hard.

            I understand that women sometimes make different choices that effect their careers. But your blindness to some of the unequal outcomes being due to bias is naive. And your outrage that senior women in the government would be happy that more women are entering into public service and running for elections is absurd.

            And your allegation that this is some sort of entitlement culture is just plain wrong.

          • mickey_moussaoui

            We have a huge entitlement culture. You choose not to see it. Certainly there are qualified individuals of every color, race, creed and gender. But here in America we make exceptions regularly to “level the playing field”. If you don’t know that then you are living in a cloud. I would never hire a lawyer who was so naive.

          • SusanBeehler

            I agree with you Matthew, I was fortunate enough to have a dad who encouraged me to try things even if they were typically a “women’s” field or interest. If we as parents; moms and dads allow our children to pursue their interests sometimes we will be pleasantly surprised at what they truly are interested in. I happened to love math just like my dad and he helped me excel in it. I also started college in engineering and than decided to pursue business instead. Women make different choices for a variety of reasons many times it is our children which we will put first before certain careers because the flexibility of the job position is not compatible for the demands of our families.

          • mickey_moussaoui

            Actually I think you are an idiot. As I stated in my original post: ” In reality they are no different than the “good old boys” from the past with their gender driven bias. It’s the same old crap sandwich in a different bread. Politics are everywhere”.

            I can only conclude that you just like to argue for argument sake without an ounce of reason. Either that or you are a woman hiding behind a male identity and this whole issue is just too sensitive for you to approach without getting your panties in a wad. Either way I was not defending any gender superiority. I was pointing out an observation from 35 years of real life experience. Politics is part of everyday life. It doesn’t always have a D or R attached to it. But in the political arena I can think of two pols that have no business where they are today except for entitlement appointments and they are John Kerry and Sonia Sotomayor. There are many more, too many to mention.

          • camsaure

            BINGO

  • sbark

    A Leftist is a leftist, no matter the gender.

    Does one really beleive Hillary would be any diff than Obama in trashing the Rule of Law, to implementation of HillaryCare Ver 2.0, to forcing thru another massive spending bill in a complete mockery of our system of Govt?

    She, in fact, mightve actually been more ruthless and cunning, judging by how her impeached husband, is already telling Obama how to circumvent the Debt Ceiling (14 amend)……….

    We have been delivered into a 3rd world functioning Govt without Rule of Law, with so many laws and regs we are all criminals except to pay your way out the “chicago way”

    Bill Whittle’s afterburner nails it

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=UeGGs6642O8

    • $8194357

      Now thats just to darn tru for skool…
      Whittle nails it in plain english…

      • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ Proof

        Sad but true.

  • KJUU

    News for them all: a politician is a politician no matter what’s attached to their body. And they’re all rated lower than used car salesmen.

  • Bat One

    I understand that Feinstein was speaking about the US Senate, but if she is being honest shouldn’t she have been equally enthused by the elections of women at all levels of government… such as Susanna Martinez, Nicki Haley, and Jan Brewer? I don’t recall seeing any comments from Feinstein approving those women’s election.

    • Matthew Hawkins

      She probably is happy that more of her opponents are women. That doesn’t mean she has to agree with them or support them.

      • Bat One

        “Probably” isn’t good enough. The question was what the corrupt Ms. Feinstein thought, not what you are pleased to assume.

  • Spartacus

    I think all Feinstein was trying to say, although she muddled it terribly, is that butched girls deserve a fair chance just like everyone else. Right Susan?

    • SusanBeehler

      Why do you feel the need to call me “butched” or any woman for that matter? It is exactly those kind of degrading remarks which is prejudice and unequal treatment of women; you say anything like that in my workplace and you would be fired and possible face legal consequences. Got it Mr. Spartacus Gladitor of the blog, slave to your testosterone.

  • Bat One
    • $8194357

      She is one of the good old boys of Democratic cronyism isn’t she..
      Hypocrits all…

  • $8194357

    The Jesses and Als of PC radical feminism cause ideology….

Top