Democats Trying To Railroad Huge Spending Bill Through Congress

Democrats have been feigning concern over federal spending and deficits since before the election, but now that they’re in power and in control of the purse strings it sure doesn’t look like they’re going to be very deliberate in their appropriations:

House Republicans such as party whip Roy Blunt of Missouri slammed Democrats plans to advance the huge $463.5 billion measure through the House Wednesday without giving Republicans or rank and file Democrats a chance to offer changes in an Appropriations Committee session or on the floor.
Most lawmakers — and the public — were to get their first chances to read the budget tome Tuesday, barely a day before the House was supposed to vote it up or down.
But Democrats such as Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey of Wisconsin had little sympathy, saying Republicans wouldn’t make tough budget choices before the election and didn’t try to clean up the mess afterward in a lame duck session.

Rep. Obey is right, I think, to criticize Republicans for not cleaning up spending while they were in power. I’d go so far as to say that the profligacy of Republican spending while in power is a biggest reason (along with corruption and scandal) while the GOP is out of power right now. But be that as it may, I don’t think it excuses the Democrats from introducing $463+ billion in spending in the House and then trying to railroad it through in less than 24 hours, barely giving most Representatives a chance to review the spending and debate it.
Why do Democrats want to spend hundreds of billions of our tax dollars with little or no debate or review in the House? That doesn’t seem very fiscally responsible to this observer.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/homosexuality_is_wrong_-_a_compendium move_zig

    Gosh, you mean folks are surprised by this behaviour? It is the very essence of so-called ‘democratic’ methodology (in quotes because there is very little democratic about it, much as in the way many communist ‘Democratic Republics’ were neither democratic nor republic) which is to spend other peoples money in the way they see fit and to do so with no dissent or input from others.

    They want unfettered power and limitless money. To consider Democrats in any other fashion is to misunderstand them.

  • jpe

    Rob, I presume this bill is a floor, not a ceiling. It provides necessary funds but doesn’t exhaust fiscal year spending. Unless the GOP really had their hearts set on stripping funds from DHS, there’s not much to debate.

  • jpe

    The democrats are freezing spending in virtually every case at 2006 levels, and it’s being called a “massive spending bill.” The media isn’t biased in favor of dems; they’re biased in favor of the dominant narratives. Democrats are profligate spenders, republicans are frugal but heartless (is there any doubt that if this spending bill were passed by a republican congress, the story would characterize the spending freeze as “severe cuts in spending, including funds for needing children” or something?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    JPE, why aren’t the Dems letting the Republicans debate the bill?

    There’s more here than meets the eye

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development