Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, November 27, 2006

Cut Out the Tax Credits

And cut the rates instead, please.

The primary problem is that tax credits erode the tax base. As the tax base shrinks, lawmakers will attempt to make up the lost revenue by increasing tax rates--leading to higher rates for everyone. Some Democratic leaders, poised to take over Congress next year, have already begun to suggest that raising tax rates will be necessary to pay for “middle-class tax cuts.” But Tax Foundation studies have shown that tax rates are already twice as high as they otherwise would be if the tax base were not worn down with tax credits:

The current system requires six tax rates ranging from 10 percent to 35 percent to raise the $912 billion in federal individual income tax revenue expected in 2005. That amounts to an average tax rate of 19.5 percent. If all personal income were taxed instead, the same revenue could be raised with rates ranging from just 4 percent to 17 percent. That would amount to an average tax rate of just 9 percent—less than half the current effective rate.

Chairman Grassley is right: tax credits are popular. But sound tax policy requires rising above politically popular measures and instead allocating the public treasure wisely. There is no reason to support measures that provide short-term gain but ultimately damage the economy in the long term.

I doubt this will ever happen because politicians of all stripes like to use our money to buy votes from us.  But there’s no doubt that a simplified tax system would be a great thing for everyone.  Is there anything more immoral than our current tax system which is set up to control our behavior.  The only purpose of taxes should be to raise the revenue to fund necessary government programs. 

Thanks to Kudlow’s Money Politics Bog.

Comments

Avatar for jpe

Tax credits are a bit like congressional pork (actually, they are congressional pork, but whatever); if their abuse is to be stopped, there’d need to be some kind of law about laws to stop them.  For instance, a law requiring 2/3 of the house or something.  Otherwise, there’s no stopping them, as they’re just another form of backscratching.

jpe on November 27, 2006 at 05:26 pm

My boss is a hard-core Democrat.  We can, however, talk about politics amicably.  I was absolutely shocked recently when she advocated a flat tax that would apply to everyone without loopholes and deductions and credits.

Maybe there is hope after all.


"Although I can accept talking scarecrows, lions and great wizards in emerald cities, I find it hard to believe there is no paperwork involved when your house lands on a witch.”
- Dave James

Steve L. on November 28, 2006 at 04:53 am

Steve, is your boss afraid the Dems are going to Lieberman her now?


[W]hat you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on November 28, 2006 at 05:09 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.