Cut And Run From Afghanistan?

Hmm…

U.S. Cedes Duties in Rebuilding Afghanistan
KABUL, Afghanistan — Four years into a mammoth reconstruction effort here that has been largely led, funded and secured by Americans, the United States is showing a growing willingness to cede those jobs to others.
The most dramatic example will come by this summer, when the U.S. military officially hands over control of the volatile southern region — plagued by persistent attacks from Islamic militias — to an international force led by the NATO alliance. The United States will cut its troop strength by 2,500, even though it is not clear how aggressively NATO troops will pursue insurgents, who have shown no sign of relenting.
At the same time, the U.S. government is increasingly allowing Western allies, or Afghans themselves, to take on the tasks of rebuilding a country that has suffered more than two decades of fighting and remains beset by poverty, drugs and insurgency.
The United States says that its shifting approach complements Afghanistan’s evolution into a self-sustaining democracy and that Washington has no plans to pull out altogether.
“The Afghans have to have enough space to make their own decisions, even to stumble sometimes,” said U.S. Ambassador Ronald Neumann. “But we shouldn’t leave them without critical support before they’re strong enough.”

So, in short, we are drawing down U.S. military and rebuilding forces in Afghanistan in favor of allowing the Afghans themselves rebuild their country and defend it from the terrorists. With some help from our international allies. Is this a negative thing? I don’t think so. For one thing, that Afghanistan is able to take more of a role in defending itself is a positive sign of progress. For another, that international forces are willing to take a more active role in Afghanistan is a testament to Bush administration diplomacy.
Yet despite the fact that this is a positive development (after all, it means that more troops can come home) the left is still in spin mode calling this a “cut and run” from Afghanistan.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array Carrick

    Marty:

    The difference is, we didn’t kick the crap outta the VC before we pulled out of ‘nam.

    Since when doesn’t utterly demolish them qualify as “kick the crap outta the VC”?

    South Vietnam wasn’t defeated by the VC (which was removed as a fighting force by their military defeat in the Tet Offensive), but by conventional tank-styled warfare. Everybody knows that!

  • 2Hotel9

    Another classic example of how the left works. No matter what is done, it is wrong. Unless they are the ones doing it, in which case it is the greatest achievment of all human history. As Charley Brown approaches the football, move it. It works for the left because real people keep buying it. Sad, sad, sad.

  • Carrick

    Ryan:

    Please articulate it.

    It’s been articulated on this web site already, by Rob, by me and by others. Do your own research for a change.

    Feel free to quote from Bush’s “Plan for Victory” – it’s a good piece of work, considering it was written by PR flack.

    You really are clueless. “Plan for Victory” was authored by Peter D Feaver.

  • Carrick

    FreeRepublican:

    My source is someone who runs a company that makes bullets for the military. Sorry to use something so relevant

    … as something that is factually in error.

    Good source.

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    My source is someone who runs a company that makes bullets for the military. Sorry to use something so relavent. Maybe next time I’ll quote O’Reilly so you wont question my patriotism. (Subtle sarcasm)

  • Marty

    That is exactly what we did in Vietnam. I fear that, just as in Vietnam, we are leaving too early.

    The difference is, we didn’t kick the crap outta the VC before we pulled out of ‘nam.

  • Carrick

    What utter gibberish—referring to the first two comments, not to Rob of course.

    There really is little else one can say to such a load of bile.

    Except on these quotes, which were so utterly moronic I couldn’t pass them up.

    I have sources telling me that our troops are literally running out of bullets. So we may be able to fight an Air War, &heellip;

    What sources would those be? The voices in your head?

    How long will we continue this futile occupation without clear-cut goals or a readily understandable exit strategy?

    Funny most of the people on this site has any trouble understanding i) why the occupation is not futile but productive and ii) have no trouble understanding the the oft-repeated, clearly articulable and easily understood exit strategy.

  • http://flickertail.blogspot.com/ Ryan G

    Funny most of the people on this site has any trouble understanding i) why the occupation is not futile but productive and ii) have no trouble understanding the the oft-repeated, clearly articulable and easily understood exit strategy.

    Please articulate it. Feel free to quote from Bush’s “Plan for Victory” – it’s a good piece of work, considering it was written by PR flack.

  • Dave

    So, in short, we are drawing down U.S. military and rebuilding forces in Afghanistan in favor of allowing the Afghans themselves rebuild their country and defend it from the terrorists.

    That is exactly what we did in Vietnam. I fear that, just as in Vietnam, we are leaving too early.

  • Dave

    The difference is, we didn’t kick the crap outta the VC before we pulled out of ‘nam.

    Yes, but “kick the crap” is a very subjective judgment.

  • http://flickertail.blogspot.com/ Ryan G

    The reason the US is handing control of Afghanistan over to international and local forces is not because of Bush’s wonderful diplomatic skills or keen grasp of tactical, ground-based warfare.

    It’s because the US forces are stretched so thinly in the world right now we’re left very vulnerable – especially after our lousy showing in maintaining control of Iraq with inadequate forces and inadequate equipment for those forces.

    When America did its unheard-of first-strike invasion of Iraq, Arab-culture experts were yanked from Afghanistan and replaced with Spanish-culture experts, for example.

    This whole situation demonstrates why fighting land wars on two fronts is not a particularly good idea, especially when done with false hopes of “flowers in the streets” and an unwillingness to listen to top commanders who ask for more troops to get the job done effectively.

    And I’m spinning things? Get real and pay attention. Bush has misled America into an unsafe position in the world, militarily and politically. We’re just lucky England and other Western nations are still willing to back us through NATO (and somewhat through the UN) to cover our asses even after we do the militarily unthinkable and perform a first-strike invasion into a country that never attacked us.

    We have the strongest military in the world and it’s being led by a guy who skipped out on his Air Guard service and another guy with an unheard of five student deferments – it’s no surprise their disdain for military service is followed by a disdain for the people in the military.

    When is enough enough? 2,000 deaths and 15,000 injuries? 4,000 deaths and 30,000 injuries? 10,000 deaths and 100,000 injuries? How long will we continue this futile occupation without clear-cut goals or a readily understandable exit strategy? Isn’t that what we elected the guy for, for cryin’ out loud?

  • http://www.freerepublicans.com/ FreeRepublicans.com

    This is first step in gracefully getting out of Iraq.

    Israel gave Iran till March to shut down the nuke program or Israel will take it into their own hands.

    When that happens, Iran will lauch attacks against Israel as well as American troops in Iraq.

    Clearly we can not handle that. I have sources telling me that our troops are literally running out of bullets. So we may be able to fight an Air War, but an old fashion shooting war is nearly impossible due to the military cuts and restructuring of the 90′s.

    So, to avoid being attacked by Iran we will have to regroup our forces, likely back in Kuwait where our guys can actually control things.

    Now, it will be portrayed as cut and run, but its just a regrouping for the big offensive.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    In Vietnam we scurried home with our tails between our legs leaving south Vietnam ripe for the north’s taking.

    In Afghanistan we’re drawing out some troops, which are being replaced by international and Afghan forces.

    Where was the similarity again?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development