Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Credit Card Fraud For Obama

Keep a close eye on your credit card bills this election season lest you end up paying for a contribution you didn’t approve to a political candidate you don’t support.

A North Kansas City couple has been left scratching their heads after they became the victims of a political scam.

Steve and Rachel Larman say a strange credit card charge appeared on their statement this month — a $2300 donation to Barack Obama’s presidential campaign. The Larman’s say they don’t want this to be about their political affiliation, but they say they’re not about to give the Obama campaign any help from their pocketbook.

They said they notified Chase, their credit card bank, to report the fraud.

“(They) said that they had seen-they were familiar with this,” said Steve Larman. “It was fraud, they believe through telemarketing but they were going to be doing some more investigations.”
The Larman’s don’t want their politics to enter into what is essentially just a fraudulent charge. But they say that the charge involves the Obama campaign adds insult to injury for the registered Republicans.

“They (Chase) kept on asking me ‘are you sure you wouldnt have gone to a site in support of Obama’,” said Rachel Larman. “And I repeatedly said ‘Im voting for McCain - I would not be going to an Obama site’.”

Chase dropped the charge from the Larman’s card. The couple is thankful thay they caught the charge on the card, but worried that others may not see that type of fraud on their own credit cards before it’s too late.

This wasn’t just some random prankster.  $2,300 is the exact amount of the maximum any individual can give to a federal candidate for office.

Comments

Avatar for OCKerouac

Once again, using a few small facts as a ramp to jump a Grand Canyon sized conclusion…

Facts:
1. Someone stole this couple’s credit card, or card number and should be prosecuted.
2. They found out about it because this person used their card to make a donation to the Obama campaign.

Conclusions (Based on NO facts):
1. The Obama campaign is directly responsible.

Not sure how you came to this one, except for the fact that you so badly WANT it to be true

2. OBVIOUSLY it was an ‘inside job’ since the person donated the maximum allowable amount.

Did you ever consider that they attempted to donate $5,000 and the amount was dropped per campaign finance law? Or perhaps, the person committing the fraud is as familiar with campaign law as you are, and subsiquently KNEW $2,300 was the maximum allowable amount? That number is not a secret…

Either way, you are continuing to reach, as you have been since this campaign started. I’m still waiting for some POSITIVE content about the McCain campaign, but all I keep seeing is more Obama-bashing…

OCKerouac on October 14, 2008 at 08:53 am

Dharma Bum,

It may not be “fair” but the reality is that when you play in the big leagues, an office holder or candidate for high office his held to account for all that is done in his name or on his behalf… good or bad.

President Bush, for example, has been held to account for all manner of things in which he has had no personal involvement, while his predecessor has taken credit for any number of things which took place during his presidency for which he was in no way responsible.

If young Mr. Obama had any sort of substantive experience, not to mention some integrity, he would take responsibility for those reprehensible things done in his name, at least to the point of publicly disavowing them and demanding that such activities stop.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on October 14, 2008 at 09:26 am

Either way, you are continuing to reach,

So, OCK, you are suggesting that by some unbelievable, mind boggling coincidence, a sophisticated thief took the risk of stealing the Larmans credit card information and decided to donate to Obama, rather than buy a new TV or something. Now that is the true reach. Does that mean the Obama Campaign is responsible?  Probably not. 

But let’s see, given all the voter fraud, the 3000 Obama campaign contributions reported by the NY Times that contained false information, and the line between the dots does not appear a long one.

By the way here is the link to the NY Times report

Oh, it could be, as you suggest, the Larmans are not telling the truth.

I’m waiting for some logical answers to valid, fact supported questions regarding Senator Obama, and his relationships.  You have heard McCains positions, and it appears you don’t like them.  That’s fine.  Why would anything anybody writes change your mind.

Gary M. on October 14, 2008 at 09:51 am
Avatar for Daniel Anderson

Why is this shocking, ACORN led by Barry is trying to steal this election and you are stunned over stealing 2300 dollars while the left just ripped off Hundreds of Billions of dollars gutting the banks and shareholders.It is only 2300 dollars after all.

Daniel Anderson on October 14, 2008 at 09:51 am

It sure does seem like a lot of illegal things are stacking up associated with the Obama campaign?

Zsa Zsa on October 14, 2008 at 10:28 am
Avatar for Bruce

Conclusions (Based on NO facts):
1. The Obama campaign is directly responsible.

Not sure how you came to this one, except for the fact that you so badly WANT it to be true

2. OBVIOUSLY it was an ‘inside job’ since the person donated the maximum allowable amount.

Spoken as a true graduate of the Joe Biden Let’s Just Make Shit Up Academy.

1. NOWHERE in the original post is the accusation that the Obama campaign is directly responsible. You pulled that one out of your ass, threw it against the wall, in hopes that to would stick, but it didn’t.

2. See #1.

If you’re going to accuse someone of operating in a non-factual manner, it would behoove you to get your own shit straight before smearing it all over the stall.

Bruce on October 14, 2008 at 10:48 am
Avatar for Bruce

Also, the article said “the charge involves the Obama campaign”.

Are you going to argue that point?

It was a fraudulent charge on their credit card paid to the Obama campaign. Hence, the campaign is “involved”.

You’re so eager to interpret this as someone making a baseless accusation against your Jesus figure, that you’re not allowing your brain to process the English language properly.

Bruce on October 14, 2008 at 10:51 am

We must be ”racist” to pre-suppose that anything nefarious could be going on with this......


/*Dave
[Political Correctness is the Shield of a Coward]

Rabid American on October 14, 2008 at 11:15 am
Avatar for Chris

Bruce,

You are a psycho.  The headline clearly leads one to conclude that Obama is directly responsible.

Chris on October 14, 2008 at 11:49 am
Avatar for Eagle Eye

The obama campaign has threatened using spam to attack patdollards blog so it would’nt suprise me that they would resort to illegal activities.  They also sent a 800,000 donation to buy off acorn. i wonder if that is illegal for Acorn to accept the donation

Eagle Eye on October 14, 2008 at 12:19 pm

I’m sure a ‘righty’ did it do discredit Obama.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on October 14, 2008 at 12:28 pm

Chris insults, You are a psycho.  The headline clearly leads one to conclude that Obama is directly responsible.

The headline: Credit Card Fraud For Obama

Key word emboldened for psycho Chris.

likwidshoe on October 14, 2008 at 01:24 pm
Avatar for David

Those silly people
They should have been told it is racist to dispute a credit card charge from Obama Hussein
They are supposed to feel privileged to have been chosen as a victim
Stupid racist greedy infidels

/sarc

David on October 14, 2008 at 02:13 pm
Avatar for Kansasgirl

What won’t this man and his minions do?

Kansasgirl on October 14, 2008 at 02:55 pm
Avatar for David

What won’t this man and his minions do?

I will give you three guesses
And stealing the election does not count

David on October 14, 2008 at 03:12 pm
Avatar for di butler

Spark,

You may be right, who knows? However, the article Rob posted was just to make people aware this was occurring. The credit card co. told the couple they were familiar w// this, so it must not be an one-off.

di butler on October 14, 2008 at 04:06 pm

di butler
i was half making fun of the comment on the other end of the link and half making fun of the fact that there are no longer facts. neither of which are funny. sorry for that.


Yun Chu said, “You must strictly not express in words what is very significant. Both dragon and snake are killed in one blow.”

Sparkie Arbuckle on October 14, 2008 at 05:25 pm
Avatar for Ben

Is it possible that Obama has family in Nigeria?

Ben on October 15, 2008 at 02:44 am
Avatar for Allen Skaggs

I notice that most people on here want to argue the facts and I agree. Charges to Obama for America also appear on my credit card. Here are my facts.

Facts:
1. I had donations to Obama for America listed on my credit card statement. The charges were made to two seperate VISA accounts. My credit company is Capital One.
2. I did not make those donations; therefore someone stole my credit card numbers. Neither Obama for America nor Capital One claim to know how my numbers were stolen.
3. This was an illegal activity. One that should be investigated and the guilty party, or parties, arrested and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, no matter who it is.

I leave you to draw what assumptions you like, but for Pete’s sake… make them intelligent ones!

Allen Skaggs on October 15, 2008 at 11:05 am
Avatar for Gothelittle Rose

When this story broke on talk radio, I heard several other callers say that they had the same thing happen to them and thought until now that it had just been a fluke. One caller from Connecticut related her friend’s attempt to start by calling the Obama Campaign to cancel the charge. The person she reached tried to talk her into leaving the charge on her card.

Granted that this is technically hearsay… the friend of a caller on a talk show. But no matter who is doing this and why, I think we should all keep an eye on our credit card statements in the upcoming days, just in case!

Gothelittle Rose on October 15, 2008 at 01:42 pm
Avatar for dbjax

Granted that this is technically hearsay… the friend of a caller on a talk show. But no matter who is doing this and why, I think we should all keep an eye on our credit card statements in the upcoming days, just in case!

Here’s one that ISN’T hearsay. My CC was billed $2000 by the Obama for America Campaign. Now, they didn’t give me any trouble disputing it and I have received a credit in the proper amount, but here is the thing. It took me 1 week to discover the charge was on the account. Don’t you think that if someone had my CC#, they would be charging as much as they could until it was cancelled? In that entire week, this was the only fraudulent charge. Think about it.

dbjax on October 15, 2008 at 03:15 pm
Avatar for TE

My parents had the same things happen to them last week as the Kansas City couple had.  The Obama Campaign Chicago office charged $2300 to their discover card. The credit card company has been notified and is investigating. They were told that it was keyed in that office to their account.  I wanted to think this was an error until I heard about the KC couple. Now I wonder how many people have become victim to this. I agree the candidate is responsible for what his campaign workers do!!

TE on October 15, 2008 at 04:31 pm
Avatar for Terri

My parents had this same thing happen to them about a week ago. The Obama Campaign office charged $2300 to their credit card.  Is this coincidence or fraud?  Isn’t it interesting the same thing happened to another couple in another city?  The credit card company is investigating. However, even if a campaign worker fraudulently did this isn’t the candidate responsible for the actions of the their team?

Terri on October 15, 2008 at 04:39 pm
Proof
Proof
13502 comments
Send a private message

The headline clearly leads one to conclude that Obama is directly responsible.

No, the headline clearly indicates that Obama is the beneficiary of the fraud. It says nothing of responsibility.


Excuse me, you were saying?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Proof on October 15, 2008 at 08:27 pm
Avatar for twosidesofthestory

I have made one ten dollar donation through my credit card and nothing happened to me. how on earth would the obama campaign ever get credit card numbers to people who absolutely do not support him? If they have never been on the site and gave out no information, where could they have gotten a card number? that doesn’t match up. this couple must have given it to someone on the inside, doubt it, and that particular person charged that card. This fraud isn’t the act of Obama himself, and for pete sake his campaign isn’t called the leige of saints. For people who still support obama DON’T LET SOME LOW LIFE THAT IS INVOLVED, WHICH COULD BE ANY VOLUNTEER FROM AROUND THE NATION, CHANGE YOUR OPINIONS OR VOTE FOR OBAMA.

twosidesofthestory on October 16, 2008 at 10:44 am
Avatar for galactical

I’ll give the Kansas couple the benefit of the doubt and say that if it did happen, they could simply call their credit card company and chargeback the amount. The problem isn’t the Obama campaign, its the idiot who stole the credit card.

galactical on October 20, 2008 at 08:42 am
Avatar for victoria

Credit card charge fraud:
We have to watchout and better check all of our credit card statement carefully.  There were a Northland Couple Warns of Political Credit Card Fraud this month.  Their chase credit card was charged $2300.00 from Obam campaign.  They states that they did not know why being charged and they voted for Mccain.  Please see the link below for the story on Fox new and the video:

http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7599837&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1

Video:
http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/MyFox/pages/sidebar_video.jsp?contentId=7600468&version=1&locale=EN-US

victoria on October 29, 2008 at 03:31 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.