Cost Of Entitlements For Seniors Hits $27,289/Person, AARP Flak Says We Have No Entitlement Crisis
We spend more on entitlements in this country than the entire world spends on wars and military, but the guy at the AARP who butters his bread by securing entitlements for his constituency says there’s no crisis.
Let me go on the record by saying that I don’t believe him.
The cost of government benefits for seniors soared to a record $27,289 per senior in 2007, according to a USA TODAY analysis.
That’s a 24% increase above the inflation rate since 2000. Medical costs are the biggest reason. Last year, for the first time, health care and nursing homes cost the government more than Social Security payments for seniors age 65 and older. The average Social Security benefit per senior in 2007 was $13,184.
“We have a health care crisis. We don’t have an entitlement crisis,” says David Certner, legislative policy director of the AARP, which represents seniors.
He says seniors shouldn’t be blamed for the growing cost of government retirement programs.
According to Census figures there are currently 45,143,991 Americans who are 62 and older. There are only 180,489,351 Americans of working age (18 - 62). That there are only 4 people working for every 1 retiree.
When you consider the above entitlement figure for every one of those retirees, $27,289 per person, that works out to a tax bill of about $6,822 for every single working-age American. Of course, that figure gets a low worse when you consider that not all Americans of working age actually work. Some are disabled. Some refuse to work. Some choose to be stay-at-home parents or spouses. If you take those people out of the equation, the bill for every working and tax-paying American gets a lot higher.
And it’s going to get even higher than that as the baby boom retires.
For any serious observer of the entitlement situation to say that we’re not in crisis mode is just plain dishonest. It’s a lie. We are in crisis, and no amount of exclamations that it’s not so (usually for the sake of political convenience) isn’t going to change that.












