Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Friday, August 04, 2006

Cookin’ The Books

From USA Today

The federal government keeps two sets of books.

The Clinton administration reported a surplus of $559 billion in its final four budget years. The audited numbers showed a deficit of $484 billion.

In addition, neither of these figures counts the financial deterioration in Social Security or Medicare. Including these retirement programs in the bottom line, as proposed by a board that oversees accounting methods used by the federal government, would show the government running annual deficits of trillions of dollars.


As bad as that is, it's currently worse:

The set the government promotes to the public has a healthier bottom line: a $318 billion deficit in 2005.

The set the government doesn't talk about is the audited financial statement produced by the government's accountants following standard accounting rules. It reports a more ominous financial picture: a $760 billion deficit for 2005. If Social Security and Medicare were included — as the board that sets accounting rules is considering — the federal deficit would have been $3.5 trillion.

Congress has written its own accounting rules — which would be illegal for a corporation to use because they ignore important costs such as the growing expense of retirement benefits for civil servants and military personnel.

Last year, the audited statement produced by the accountants said the government ran a deficit equal to $6,700 for every American household. The number given to the public put the deficit at $2,800 per household.

The Bush administration opposes including Social Security and Medicare in the audited deficit. Its reason: Congress can cancel or cut the retirement programs at any time, so they should not be considered a government liability for accounting purposes.

The audited financial statement — prepared by the Treasury Department — reveals a federal government in far worse financial shape than official budget reports indicate, a USA TODAY analysis found. The government has run a deficit of $2.9 trillion since 1997, according to the audited number. The official deficit since then is just $729 billion. The difference is equal to an entire year's worth of federal spending.


Props to RFM52 @ Prosperity USA

Comments

Avatar for Robert Perry

USA Today is catching up with Walter Williams--and I think the CATO Institute--only a few years after Williams wrote about this.  I dare say it’s time for the government to simply declare bankruptcy and try to make the best of it.

Robert Perry on August 4, 2006 at 11:29 am
Rob
Rob
19961 comments
Send a private message

If you ask any debt management specialist in the world what the first step is to getting back in the black and they’ll tell you: Stop digging.

Meaning: stop spending money.

Do our politicians get that?  Of course not.  Democrats have a heart attack any time someone even mentions slowing the rate in growth of spending on entitlement programs, and these days Republicans seem more interested in out-spending the Democrats to pander to voters than actually exercising some fiscal responsibility.

It’s pathetic.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on August 4, 2006 at 11:34 am
Avatar for The Whistler

If you ask any debt management specialist in the world what the first step is to getting back in the black and they’ll tell you: Stop digging.

Meaning: stop spending money.

Would you be willing to talk to Mrs. Whistlerr?

The Whistler on August 4, 2006 at 11:48 am
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

We are throwing money into a bottomless pit.  Defaulting is not a good option at all, but it soon may be the only choice at this rate.

On many levels - financially and policy-wise - starting from scratch has quite the appeal.  But people forget about the 20 or so years for the world economy to recover.

FreeRepublicans.com on August 4, 2006 at 11:55 am
Avatar for The Whistler

Freep,

I don’t like the deficit any more than you do.  However the deficit for this year is 2.3% which is exactly the average for the last 40 years.

Given that the economy is growing FASTER than that we aren’t falling deeper into a hole. 

Overspazzing over the issue is as bad as ignoring it.

The Whistler on August 4, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for The Whistler

2.3% of GDP that is.

The Whistler on August 4, 2006 at 12:03 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Actually, wrong.  The GAAP deficit is in the trillions of dollars, or 20-30% of GDP.  Imagine your wife buying $20k worth of new shoes, and putting it all on the credit card.

It’s only the cooked books that suggest 2.3%.  Ken Lay has nothign on Washington, DC.

Robert Perry on August 4, 2006 at 12:13 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Actually, wrong. The GAAP deficit is in the trillions of dollars, or 20-30% of GDP. Imagine your wife buying $20k worth of new shoes, and putting it all on the credit card.

It’s only the cooked books that suggest 2.3%. Ken Lay has nothign on Washington, DC.

Yep.  That is the point of this article.

I originally titled this piece “The United States of Enron,” as I did on my blog.

FreeRepublicans.com on August 4, 2006 at 12:23 pm
Avatar for Steve

The LLL types love to talk about how President Bush wasted the Clinton surplus.

I’ve never believed there was a surplus. I can write in a $10,000 deposit in my checkbook, and suddenly I have one heck of a surplus, at least on paper.

As for Clinton’s surplus, if there ever was one, it had nothing to do with him, because Republicans were in control of Congress, and the budget.

Steve on August 4, 2006 at 02:35 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.