Company So Afraid Of Political Recriminations They’re Asking Obama To Approve Bonuses

They don’t have to ask Obama’s “compensation czar” for permission for the bonuses, but AIG is so afraid of being lambasted by grandstanding politicians looking to distract from their own greed they’re doing it anyway. Obama’s thuggish administration has so intimidated a company operating in what is supposed to be a free market that they’re actually supplicating the government for permission on compensating they’re own employees.
That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a free country.

American International Group is preparing to pay millions of dollars more in bonuses to several dozen top corporate executives after an earlier round of payments four months ago set off a national furor.
The troubled insurance giant has been pressing the federal government to bless the payments in hopes of shielding itself from renewed public outrage.
The request puts the administration’s new compensation czar on the spot by seeking his opinion about bonuses that were promised long before he took his post.
AIG doesn’t actually need the permission of Kenneth R. Feinberg, who President Obama appointed last month to oversee the compensation of top executives at seven firms that have received large federal bailouts. But officials at AIG, whose federal rescue package stands at $180 billion, have been reluctant to move forward without political cover from the government. Setting aside nonsensical, populist objections to people who work in big business making a lot of money, is this not still a free country? Is the American dream not, at least in part, about being free to be as prosperous as you want to be?
Yet here we have a major American company feeling compelled not by law but by pure intimidation to supplicate the government before it hands out bonuses to its employees.
“Anytime we write a check to anybody” it is highly scrutinized, said an AIG official, who declined to speak on the record because the negotiations with Feinberg are ongoing. “We would want to feel comfortable that the government is comfortable with what we are doing.”

About a month ago I said that our political leaders were turning us into a nation of supplicants instead of citizens. This is yet another example of that. In what is supposed to be a free country, we have one of our largest businesses looking to supplicate the government for permission to give its employees bonuses not because the company is required to do that by law but rather because they’ve been thoroughly intimidated by a gang of politicians who fully intend to run our economy for us.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • http://www.fileitunder.com/ JR Ewing

    They pretty much have to do this. If they pay contracted bonuses they would draw Senate fire, if they do not pay they will draw lawsuits for failing to fulfill contracts. Again this all goes back to Congress intentionally inserting that clause that states that previous contracts should be fulfilled. They put AIG in an impossible position so they could blame “evil executives” regardless of what they did.

    It is funny that corporations have been demonized recently for greed and only being concerned with themselves and their personal interests, but now the Federal Government is the one fitting that bill.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    Welcome to the world of communism. This is a sad testimate of what we have become.

  • raaa

    Any Congressperson who does not publicly denounce this atrocity and block these bonuses needs to be voted out of office next term.

    This is outrageous. Enough! The American public is dying economically. We need to fire everyone at AIG, not give them bonuses. Don’t you hear us Congress?

    We’re watching. Congress, you either shine or sink based on your response buddies.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/america_is_back/#c397018 DINO

    They should be glad they’re not in prison or in shackles because that’s where they belong.

  • Brent

    That’s not how it’s supposed to work in a free country.

    AIG needs to go out of business. Even if Bush and Paulson were right (and they most certainly were not) about the importance of “saving AIG”, everything that has since transpired (and will continue to to transpire) is reason enough to have just left AIG die.

  • jimmypop

    hate barry all you like, but bush and the liberal congress started all this.

  • jimmypop

    AIG needs to go out of business. Even if Bush and Paulson were right (and they most certainly were not) about the importance of “saving AIG”, everything that has since transpired (and will continue to to transpire) is reason enough to have just left AIG die.

    citibank said there is a 70% chance of them doing just that….. at least the european soccer league got some jerseys.

  • WOOFX

    They should be afraid

    The company is reviewing its compensation plans with Washington as it tries to avoid the national furor set off by $165 million in retention bonuses paid to employees of a financial products unit in March. Much of AIG’s $99 billion in losses last year stemmed from derivatives written by that unit.

    If this were China they’d be on their kness in front of a dish awaiting organ harvesting.

    In total, U.S. taxpayer aid of up to $180 billion has been extended to the insurer that once claimed global dominance.

    Dad I was Drunk and Totaled the Car, Need an Advance On My Allowance

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    AIG needs to go out of business.

    Well they need to live or die on their own, not get government bailouts.

    If they go out of business, so be it. I wouldn’t be happy about it, but happier certainly than I am now about them sucking up my tax dollars.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development