Home ND News Mobile Forum Contact Reader Blogs Register Login

Saturday, March 31, 2007


CNN’s Double Standards

While the whole “Mohamed cartoons” controversy was going on CNN was publishing this excuse for not publishing them:

CNN is not showing the negative caricatures of the likeness of the Prophet Mohammed because the network believes its role is to cover the events surrounding the publication of the cartoons while not unnecessarily adding fuel to the controversy itself.

But one some artist makes a mocking sculpture of Jesus out of chocolate that ticks off Catholics (and other Christians, I’m sure) they aren’t so concerned about sensitivity:

image

Now my criticism of CNN isn’t meant to imply that they shouldn’t be publishing pictures of this chocolate Jesus thing.  I’m just wondering why these journalists (because it isn’t just CNN) are ok with offending Christians, but not ok with offending Muslims?

To answer my own rhetorical question, I think there are two reasons.

First, Catholics and Christians in general aren’t known for sawing the heads off reporters (see: Daniel Pearl) who write stories they don’t like.

Second, it’s selective liberal multiculturalism at work.  It’s ok to offend Christians because Christians aren’t a protected class.  They haven’t been selected as victims by the left.  Muslims have been, thus they cannot be offended.  This is the same line of thinking that allows black comedians to make jokes at the expense of whites when the reverse would have the comedian castigated as a racist.

Now, I know many of you probably don’t see this chocolate Jesus/Mohamed cartoons double standard as being all that important.  But it is, really.  Remember that it’s these same reporters who, when it comes to sparring with the Bush administration, paint themselves as fearless truth-tellers who risk the wrath of powerful politicians to bring us the news.  They bristle at any attempt to rein in their sometimes irresponsible reporting as being attempts to intimidate them and infringe upon their first amendment rights.  Yet it’s these same “truth tellers” who bend to the wishes of murderous, extremist nuts in all sorts of little ways.

Like not printing the Mohamed cartoons.  Or not using the word “terrorist” when reporting on actual terrorists.  Or refusing to directly report the nationalities of the people responsible for some terrorist attacks.  Or whitewashing the terrorists themselves by not putting the monstrosities committed by them in the proper context they deserve. 

It happens every day for just the reasons I laid out.

It’s because these reporters are scared, and because they’re so blinded by their liberal faith that they can’t bring themselves to look past their myopic multiculturalism to the truth of the deadly cultural battle we are currently engaged in.

Does this tick you off? Click here to email your elected representatives right here on Say Anything, or comment below.

Comments

Avatar for Andrew

Or refusing to directly report the nationalities of the people responsible for some terrorist attacks

This brings up something I just realized last week that made me very disappointed in Fox and 24. Has anyone noticed that on 24 when a terrorist is from Russia, China, etc, it is ok to say the name of the country? However, no one dares to mention what middle eastern country the terrorist Fayad is from? They just refer to it as “Fayad’s country”. Even in the war room when the vice president is prepared to launch a nuclear strike on the country, he just refers to it as “Fayad’s country”. I expected more from that show, but it won’t keep me from watching.

Andrew on March 31, 2007 at 07:49 am

You are exactly right.

Bald-Headed Geek on March 31, 2007 at 08:35 am

Rob: You are beginning to make me mad, you cover some of these subject so well and your commentaries are so to the point, fair and clear, there really isn’t anything left to say!


In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

Neiman on March 31, 2007 at 08:36 am
Avatar for chinthakan

well, I see the way the whole issue being treated as hypocritical. When Mohd. cartoons were published or even when Pope made his bigoted comments, the whole western media and right wing politicians came to justify the publishing of cartoons in the name of artistic freedom..Now as the exhibition of naked jesus is cancelled and even death threats being launched against organizers from catholic league, where is your love for free speech? I see CNN’s double standard in a different way - where is the sort of countless debates and talkshows on free speech heh?

chinthakan on April 1, 2007 at 11:27 am

...cartoons were published or even when Pope made his bigoted comments…

Recounting history is now “bigoted”?

...the whole western media and right wing politicians came to justify the publishing of cartoons in the name of artistic freedom…

Actually it was argued on freedom of speech grounds.

Now as the exhibition of naked jesus is cancelled and even death threats being launched against organizers from catholic league, where is your love for free speech?

Who are you talking to? Certainly nobody present. You’re arguing a straw man.

likwidshoe on April 1, 2007 at 11:33 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

If you want to ignore a fellow commenter, download this.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.