I see that the MySpace page of Maria Luisa is now set to private – friends only. Hmmmm. Do I smell a coverup by the Clintonites?

R108, the Republicans run their debates the same exact way.

Prove it.

robert108 on November 17, 2007 at 12:45 pm

No proof needed.It is the way it is.
It is the same as having the questioners of our president (in townhall type meetings)prescreened and asking favorable qustions. I don’t approve of either.

It appears as if even liberals are picking up on this. Gee, all this time I thought it was just the right wing nut jobs. It appears that the left wing nut jobs are at it, too.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/16/11735/441

They’re just picking on Hillary.

Is that the best you got Jenny baby?

She’s got a first-person experience of the truth; what have you got, besides the usual Dem talking points?

B1,silly boy, do you want to go down memory lane of scandals. It’s been done so many times now.

I didn’t say blogs don’t matter, I said that the rightie blogs are trying to gin up a controversy where there is none, Whit, get it now?

I wouldn’t mind planted questions so much if they were valid questions, the type that provide answers that prove the individual is worthy of receiving my vote. The answer to the question Rob refers to might be useful to me if I were playing trivial persuit but the time would have been spent asking her to explain, in terms a simple person like myself can understand,questions similar to how she plans to pay for her health care plan.

Golfman- I have done HOURS of research this afternoon. I’m sick at the connection. I’m sick because I haven’t got the resources to nail it in the nead. (I did however, email Matt Drudge and others).

Is there no end to what they’ll do? I mean, we can’t even get real people to ask real questions? These people were fake.

I’m currently researching, but apparently some of the names were changed from the transcripts, because in interviews, they’re different. Kalid Khan is seen in websearches as having the first name Mohammed. Chris Jackson is really Chris Gallagher. Maria Luisa is Maria Parra-Sandoval. This is sick. Why would they change the names?

I’m currently researching an other one, who appears to have political connections, too. I won’t mention it here, as I don’t know that for sure yet, I’m just 50/50 on that, but if I get more sure, I’ll be sure to post the link.

I will not let this go, I watched that debate, and I feel lied to and deceived.

The problem here is that you guys are conservatives. Therefore, by definition, you are capable of careful, rational thought. Thus, you are unable to comprehend
the Democrat rationalization for the planted questions, which is that since ALL the questions were apparently planted, this was a fair debate!

(You know how liberals just love the word “fair”… even if they are only tenuously and selectively aware of its meaning.)

Her name is NOT Maria Luisa. That must be the name on her myspace page. According to the transcripts of CNN’s debates, her name is Maria Parra-Sandoval (which you can hear her say, anyway) and…she worked for Harry Reid.

http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0711/15/se.02.html

http://www.leg.state.nv.us/74th/Journal/Assembly/Final/AJ036.pdf

http://www.lasvegasnevada.gov/files/2005_CLA_Yearbook.pdf
(page 23 has her picture, here)

Interestingly enough, Kalid Kahn, the man who asked the racial profiling question is the president of the Islamic Council of Nevada. Big dude. If you websearch, you can find possible connections to him and Harry Reid, as it appears Harry Reid visited the mosque.

http://www.lvmasjid.com/links/financial_needs.asp

Upon further search, and a link from someone on Ann Coulter’s forum, we will see that Maria Parra-Sandoval was an illegal alien, who came from Mexico as a child, but has since got her paperwork together.

However, it is no coincidence that that girl HAPPENED to be there, and HAPPENED to be picked to ask and HAPPENED to be called upon, yet HAPPENED to have worked for Harry Reid. If you websearch, you will find her name associated with him all over the internet.

Jeannie Jackson is a professional moonbat. There are too many links to put up, but we are currently searching about her possible connections to city council in a town just outside of Santa Ana, Ca. I will post that link if I find something that connects her.

Anwyay, I’m sick. I can’t beleive this is true. Do the research yourself, and you’ll see. Simply amazing.

As promised, here is the link. The connection has been made and once everyone cathches up to Maria Luisa Parra- Sandoval, the DNC and possibly CNN is toast.

The insinuation I made earlier regarding a possible plant that had to do with the democratic party in Arkansas is none other than the supreme court questioner, Lashannon Spencer. Big wheel in the democratic party in LITTLE ROCK.

The connection was first made by a person commenting in the section on Dan Riehl’s site, then Dan made it, then Hot air picked it up. what I’m giving you here are MORe PICTURES! (Isn’t the internet great?????)

http://hotair.com/archives/2007/11/16/random-questioner-at-debate-was-arkansas-democratic-party-officer-in-2003/

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/08/national/08VOTE.html?ei=5007&en=1eb5085cd879c762&ex=1375675200&partner=USERLAND&pagewanted=all&position=

If you can look at them side by side, it is ONE in the SAME lady! Jesus. Mary. Joseph.

I’m just waiting on everyone to figure out who Maria is, and it’s over.

Oh, OUCH!

This hurts!

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/17/cnn-stocked-audience-controlled-thursdays-debate-questions

Gee- I’m not even on there!

Chris O- If I’m such an idiot, then how com you didn’t find out that Maria worked for Harry Reid, or that Khalid is no Average Joe, being president of the Islamic Society of Nevada or that LaShannon Spencer was the director of political affairs for the Democratic party in Little Rock Arkansas?

It has nothing to do with democratic activists attending debates. It’s about the specific questioners were presented to the American public as being “undecided democratic voters”, just like you or me, when in fact they are far from ordinary citizens, but instead have big backgrounds and political ties.

The ONLY thing left to discover is who picked these people? Don’t you find it odd, that these people just HAPPENED to get tickets and HAPPENED to be called upon?

If I’m such an idiot, then what I’ve found will surely be false. I DARE you to find one thing that is untrue, and being that I’m an idiot, that should be an easy task. I haven’t claimed to be an investigative reporter, but someone who did their homework. You, apparently satisfied to eat what they’re feeding you, can only resort to calling me names (how mature), rather than disputing what I’ve said, which you can’t.

I would say that since you can’t find anything contrary to what’s been discovered, and probably won’t even try, that you step away from the keyboard. That you don’t find any of this fishy is telling. But you know, (Well, maybe not) the New York Times reported about Maria Luisa Parra-Sandoval, as well. Some average random person, my ass. Like the rest. Go on and find something that says this is untrue. I dare you.

http://pcexposed.blogspot.com/

Puzzle- you said Hillary planted, I did not.

And if what you say is true about republcians, then prove it.

If the dems got the tickets to hand out as they chose, then why weren’t we told that, either? Especially in light of the lottery tickets at UNLV.

Prove it. You mean to tell me you don’t think if awfully strange that CNN stated these were undecided voters, randomly picked to ask questions- regular folks like you and me, when in fact they weren’t? You don’t find that odd?

All of my fellow democrat friends think it odd. But you know, CNN is so trustworthy, anyway. Why should I question- who am I to question?

Now for all you incensed folks out there, this is the way the world works.

It’s the way the leftie world works.

They rigged the audience, they rigged the questions, and they rigged the responses after the debate.
CNN also “pre-reported” some of the answers, like the seemingly spontaneous inclusion of abortion into one of the questions. How did they do that?

TLB- I saw that on the debate and yelled at the TV (you know, like it could hear me.) It was total BS.

I’ve been at this since around 1:30 today and at this point, I need a valium the size of a donut. I may take a break. However, check out these links, as this is picking up like wildfire on the internet. Blogs are lighting up- even on Obama’s website they’re talking about this.

For the record, I don’t know why my thread on Ann Coulter’s website was locked- that’s interesting. Having said that, I don’t know if the link will work, because I think you have to register to be able to view the forum. Anyway, here are other message boards, and be sure to check out Dan Riehl’s site as well, because he’s got some ESPECIALLY juicy stuff!!!

http://chat.anncoulter.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1117176#1117176

http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2007/11/cnn_denies_diamonds_and_pearl_girl_was_forced_to_ask_question.php

http://www.classicalvalues.com/

http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2007/11/did-cnn-plant-t.html

The news reports indicated that the candidates each got a number of tickets to be handed out and the rest were given to UNLV to handed out on a lottery basis.

I’ve been involved in a number of political campaigns over the years, and I don’t know of a single one that didn’t have precautions as to whom would be allowed to asked questions to prevent inappropriate questions from being asked. It is standard operating procedure for debates at this level.

So no, Jenny baby I don’t find it odd since I know how both parties run their primary debates.

You are the one making the allegation of some democratic/news conspiracy.

Hey Jenny baby, you can question all you want; just to come here with your feigned indignation and claim to be one of those undecided democratic voters who feels lied to and deceived. Get a grip, lady.

Puzzle, I do beleive that you are holding onto the hope that this remains a non-issue. But with the fact that this is being discussed among liberals and conservatives alike indicates that people-you know, ordinary “undecided voters” don’t like this stuff too much.

And the fact that you don’t buy this (ha! Geez.) leads me to beleive that you’re a Hillary supporter. My linking to other blogs serves the purpose that this issue is NOT one among just the right wingers. I know that’s a hard pill to swallow, but a spooon full of sugar…you know. It’s okay that you don’t like it and you don’t have to beleive it, either. But you can’t refute it. You just keep calling me baby and telling me to get a grip. What a maverick you are!

Looks like CNN was trying to create a ‘Boxers or Briefs’ moment for Hillary. You know, one of those sound bites that is supposed to make her look somewhat human.

They should have just asked her ‘Boxers or Briefs’.

Hey, Jenny Bea, maybe you could try distorting the truth a little less. Read the transcript. CNN described the questioners as “undecided voters.” You come up with “If I told you that I was going to pick a couple random people to ask you a few questions, every day Americans, average Joes,” Jesus, where do you get this? CNN used none of those descriptors. This was a Democratic primary debate. Do you think the undecided voters were Republicans who were undecided who they wee going to vote for in the Democratic primary?

And no, I didn’t know the girl worked for Harry Reid, or the woman was from Arkansas. So what? All of your posts on this subject are overheated red herrings. You’re playing the game where if you find out a fact that wasn’t announced, it must have been intentionally hidden. They describe each person in about one sentence. How much background are you expecting to get?

Have you ever been to a debate? Who do you think attends these things? Do you think your beloved “Average Joes” are getting their asses off the couch and going to that mob scene out of curiosity? It’s a natural occurrence for campaigns to try and get as many of their sympathisers as possible into these kind of events. And isn’t it possible that the strong positive response to Hillary from the crowd was reflective of the fact that she holds a huge lead in the polls there?

Face it, you’re breathlessly posting your stupid links as it the more links you post, the righter you are. Try posting somethig with some substance. And stop patting yourself on the back until you do.

Here’s a quick challenge for you. You seem offended that the questioners were identified as undecided voters. Yet I notice you haven’t posted anything tying any of them to a candidate. So why is it wrong to call them undecided? Or in your limited world view is it impossible for someone to intern for Harry Reid and still be undecided who she’ll vote for in the primary?

Puzzle… You sure are snippy!

No,Carol, I know that you are spouting the spin o’ the day, but if you do a bit of your own research, you will see that the participants were asked to write down 5 questions, one of which was a fun question. Please try to keep up if you’re coming to the party a bit late.

Oh and Carol as is everyone who watches CNN doesn’t know who James Carville is. And if you don’t you’ve been living in a cave since 1992. Give me a break, already. Keep tryin to manufacture a controversy where there is none.

If I had as little to offer the country as the Democrats have… all of them… I don’t believe I’d want someone “fair and balanced and unafraid” to be asking questions either.

Once you get past raising US taxes and reducing US sovereignty, the Democrats don’t have anything much more to talk about.

Dear ChrisO,

Forgive me for not posting sooner, as I’ve been busy and haven’t taken the time.

For you to argue that democrat supporters go to democrat debates is completely redundant. Obviously there won’t be republicans going.

I’ll pose the same question to you as Puzzle- if I told you that I was going to have some random person, every day ordinary citizen ask you a question, and that person was ANYTHING but what I told you…did I lie?

CNN COULD have said that these people had big politcal backgrounds and HUGE democratic ties- (no one said they were tied to a candidate- you assumed that), CNN could have said something to the effect of these folks asking questions represent the views of alot of democrats-which would have been true-and that would not have been a lie. It’s their show, they can have on whoever they want, from where ever, with which ever background. But when they tell you something about that person, and it turns out to not be true…

(Don’t you think it’s calling liberals lazy to assume that some regular joe democrat won’t get off his lazy ass to go to a debate? I know MANY active liberals, livng here in NY, some that have been to debates- REAL regular folks.)

So, I’m not sure what you don’t get. And if I’m an idiot- prove me wrong. Prove what I said to be wrong. And prove all the other bloggers- the left wing nuts and right wing nuts all talking about the same thing and saying the very same things, wrong. Go on and do it. Prove the Daily Kos- those kOOKs- who have said the EXACT same things, wrong.

Just because you think it’s alright for CNN to call an apple and orange doesn’t mean the rest of the world thinks like that. How big does the lie have to be, anyway? Furthermore, that CNN would do that at democratic debates, it’s safe to assume it’s done at the republican ones, too- which means that it’s all pointless to even watch, because it’s just the promotion of the person they like.

So, oh smart one- like I said- if I told you that a regular person, every day average citizen was going to ask you a question, and they turned out not to be- did I lie?

And if you fail to grasp that concept, then it looks like I may not be the ONLY idiot.

“Just because you get from an established source doesn’t mean it’s true.”

http://news.sky.com/skynews/article/0,,30400-1293633,00.html?f=rss

Interesting Interview.

(Chris- for got to answer your question: I do not believe (in your example) that Maria Luisa worked in Harry Reidtard’s office in Las Vegas and DC HAPPENED to be lucky enough to get 1 out of 100 tickets by lottery -out of how many students?-to go to the debate, and HAPPENED to be a person who got to submit a question and HAPPENED to be called upon to ask that question. No, in my LIMITED WORLD VIEW, I just don’t see that happening. I think I may just win the real lottery first.)

The questions were portrayed as being those thought up by the audience. When they’re really thought up by CNN producers…that’s wrong.

Please list one source that you claim shows the questions were thought up bi CNN producers. That is flat out not true. CNN requested questions from audience members. Maria says she listed 5. One had to be a “fun” question, and for that she gave the Diamond or pearls question.

What pissed her off was when she was asked to ask a question, she was told she could only ask her fun question.

Now for all you incensed folks out there, this is the way the world works. Your hero, our Dear Leader, has been going to scripted events for his entire presidency.

This is a democratic debate and democrats go to it. So the audience is almost universally made up of democrats. And the democrats get to ask the questions that they compose.

Now what is all the surprise that people connected to leading Nevada democrats get to go to the head of the line. This is an event, of democrats, in Nevada, and golly gee, there is such surprise that a person who worked for Harry Reid, a democrat, no less, would get to ask a question.

Wait, I see the light. This is unbelievable. Incomprehensible. Those danged librels are up to their no-good dirty tricks agin. If CNN has its way, we’ll end up with bitch Hillary running the country, and it will be over fer sure.

Something else re Maria Luisa Parra-Sandoval’s now private MySpace page: it says she’s 15, even though other spources list her birth year as 1985. I believe the idea that she is a 22 year-old former Reid intern and UNLV student to be more likely. I’m not MySpace heavy, but is age something you have to update or do you just provide a birthday and it calculates it for you? If the latter, it seems possible that the age was intentionally manipulated to make the private page seem more reasonably expected.

No proof needed.It is the way it is.

Proof is needed to support your unfounded accusation; you just don’t have it.

Zsa Zsa, you are the last one to call me snippy. go back and read some of your own comments about Hillary and the democrats. Pot meet kettle.

Let me appologize for dominating this board- it isn’t what I intended to do. However, just when I think I’m going to take a break, more things keep tripping me up and I find out even more.

Why does everyone keep referring to her as Maria Luisa? Why because that’s her MIDDLE NAME! Maria Luisa Parra-Sandoval. Wanna see her picture again?

http://www.nhli.org/2005LLLfellows.htm

And if it didn’t get any better, Harry Reid has a listing of his staff:

http://www.zimbio.com/Senator+Harry+Reid+of+Nevada/notes/1/Senator+Reid+s+Staff

(Please note that when searching the two of them, do not include her middle name as they don’t use it in their records)

More interestingly enough, here’s more info (with PICTURE) of her scholarship write up. Sounds like a nice girl, but still a PLANT!

http://foundation.unlv.edu/casestudies/scholarships.html

If that weren’t enough, there have been apparent connections to the “unknown” woman who asked about the supreme court justices (which Suzanne Malveaux stepped all over), and according to Dan Riehl’s site, she is linked to the democratic party in …*drumroll* ARKANSAS…Look it up! (she is listed as her name unknown in the CNN transcripts)

Man this just keeps getting better. I don’t know how I’m going to be able to sleep.

HILLARY THE LEFTIST PUPPET CANDIDATE

Lacking for a strong real candidate, the dominant Leftist Democrats have run Hillary. The problem is that she has long been observed to be emotionally and intellectually deficient.

Their clever solution is to systematically change her image; under the assumption that the American People are for the most part too simple minded to know the difference between realities and illusions.

To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be compassionate, meticulous studies are made of the social and economic needs of various social and economic goups, such as homosexuals and low income elderly voters. To see who does the research for the emotional Hillary-puppet displays, Google: Mark Penn.

To make the Hillary-puppet appear to be mentally superior, questions must be planted and answers must be rigorously rehearsed. To see who does the research for these brilliant questions and answers, Google: Mark Penn.

The fatal flaw is that the small group of Leftist Democratic masterminds behind this Hillary-puppet Show is just not quite clever enough to successfully pull off their scam. Moral depravity and intellectual bankruptcy are their self-limiting handicaps.

The World is closely watching the American Cultural War; Google: Who Would the World Elect.

Well, I see Patrick basically made my point, but I’m going to echo it. Jenny Bea, you are an idiot. You spent hours finding out that Democratic activits attend Democratic debates? I know you guys think everything’s another Rathergate, but really, doing a Google search doesn’t make you an investigative reporter. Is there any indication that the girl tried to hide her identity? Or should she have prefaced her question by listing every Democratic Party sponsored event she’s attended? Back away from the keyboard.