Clinton Appointed Federal Judge Being Impeached

Warner Todd Huston writes:

A Federal judge from Louisiana is under a cloud of impeachment and if he’s convicted it’ll be the first Federal judge impeached in almost 20 years.

Sounds newsworthy!

The story was covered by the new wire service named ProPublica, a service that claims to be non-partisan. Yet in two stories on this judge there is not one mention of the fact that he was appointed to the bench by President Bill Clinton, nor that his corruption was known by the Department of Justice when Clinton made the appointment.

Yikes! Has our Resident Partisan Scold been told about this??

…A while back, I wrote of a new wire service that was starting up to be called ProPublica. This new service claimed that it was going to be a non-partisan service but the fact that it was being funded by left-wing billionaires made me wonder about the veracity of that claim.

The stories tell about $80,000 of unaccounted for cash that drifted into the judge’s accounts. (Isn’t that almost what William “Dollar Bill” Jefferson had in his freezer?)

It turns out that President Bill Clinton put this corrupt judge on the bench in 1994, even though the Department of Justice knew this guy was a crook. Heck, even the Associated Press mentioned that this judge was a Clinton appointee. Yet strangely, the fact that this corrupt, bribe taking, gambling addicted, thief of a judge was a Clinton appointee didn’t seem relevant to ProPublica. I wonder what that says of ProPublica’s claims that it just wants to report the facts in a non-partisan manner?

Wow! When you are to the left of the AP in your bias, that’s really saying something!
Hat tip Stop the ACLU
Cross posted at Proof Positive

Tags:


«
»
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/Anna/ Anna

    Yep. We will be seeing the consequences of the Clinton years for a long time to come and the Demon-crats will always be in denial along with the press

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    The Dems are seldom if ever held accountable for their actions. They ignore and deny (lie)their way through everything, Examples; Bill Clinton, Sandy Burglar, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Cynthia McKinney etc. etc

    This pisses me off because the left ran on the platform that of ethics and these clowns are turning into the biggest bunch of ethically challenged buffoons.

  • Bat One

    Anna,

    I don’t think its denial. Its a more fundamental elitist arrogance that such corrupt behavior doesn’t matter… even when they’re caught.

  • Dick Tofel

    As Mr. Huston noted, the ProPublica article clearly stated that the judge was appointed in 1994. We think ProPublica readers are aware of who was president that year.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    The Dems are seldom if ever held accountable for their actions. They ignore and deny (lie)their way through everything, Examples; Bill Clinton, Sandy Burglar, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Cynthia McKinney etc. etc…

  • Michael K.

    Sounds like Alcee Hastings.

    Homework Assignment: See if you can find who appointed him in that Wikipedia article.

  • Bat One

    Michael K,

    Beat me to it! I was going to suggest that if the judge is impeached, he can always make a comeback as a Democrat congressman. Pelosi would welcome him with open arms.

  • Bat One

    Zsa Zsa,

    These are people for whom questions of right and wrong as you and I understand them simply don’t matter. They don’t know the difference between righteousness and self-righteousness, and worse, they don’t care.

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Bat One, What is odd is the Dem voters continue electing them and rally around them as if they haven’t done anything to be ashamed of??? I am all for forgiveness but there are some things that are undeniably not what I would hope for in a leader. Rape, negligent homicide or manslaughter, and being a KKK leader are just a few of those things I have problems looking up to in elected officials.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Yeesh. Now here’s my question; were this guy’s ethics known to the Senate as a whole, or should they have been, back in 1994? Yes, I’m willing to award 10 points against the Dems on this one, but I tend to think we need to give at least 7 against the GOP for letting him get to the bench.

  • robert108

    As Mr. Huston noted, the ProPublica article clearly stated that the judge was appointed in 1994. We think ProPublica readers are aware of who was president that year.

    Nice try. If this judge had been either a Republican, or had been appointed by a Republican President, especially President Bush, it would have been in the headline. “Bush Judge Faces Impeachment” or something like that.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Imagine that. The AP knew he was a crook. That is saying something. We do not need crooks as judges. We need honest people with integrity. There are plenty around, but we can not get the socialDemocrats to vote them in because they do not agree with honesty and integrity. That is the problem.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    I guess that makes his impeachment “historic”, right?

    I’m sure our own Resident Partisan Scold (rps) is putting the finishing touches on his post on this even as we speak!

  • robert108

    …the first Federal judge impeached in almost 20 years.

    I guess that makes his impeachment “historic”, right?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development