CIA Fires Back, Wants Justice Department To Investigate Intelligence Leaks

CIA Director Leon Panetta has had enough and has demanded that the Justice Department investigate the numerous intelligence leaks that keep popping out of our intelligence pipelines in a steady drip of information, and is damaging to our intelligence gathering capabilities as well as possibly crippling the execution of tactical operations:

Besieged by leaks of several closely held secrets, the CIA has asked the Justice Department to examine what it regards as the criminal disclosure of a secret program to kill foreign terrorist leaders abroad, The Washington Times has learned.
[...]
The vice chairman of the the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence declined to discuss any possible leak investigations but told the Times on Thursday that a growing number of disclosures of highly secret programs, tactics and other information had caused “irreparable damage” to the U.S. intelligence community.
“They foil our attempts to carry out classified missions,” Sen. Christopher S. Bond said in an interview. “They tell our intelligence community: We don’t have your back; we’re stabbing you in the back. Our allies ask us, ‘How can we trust you to deal in classified matters in private, when the details are leaked to the press?’”
Mr. Bond, a Republican from Missouri, said he heard this refrain in recent meetings with heads of European, South Asian and Middle Eastern allied intelligence services. “Nobody has told me they won’t cooperate, but they are asking the question,” he said.

The New York Times, one of the most frequent and egregious town criers where sensitive information is concerned, is ever eager to blast any and all classified information they uncover.

One element of the new leak investigation involves a New York Times story last month that said the secret program employed the security contractor Xe – formerly known as Blackwater. The plan was never put into effect – and Mr. Panetta canceled it as soon as he learned of it, according to the CIA.
But the disclosure has had other consequences: Al Qaeda has placed Xe’s chief executive, Eric Prince, on its own version of a most-wanted list, said Mark Corallo, a spokesman for the contractor.

Most reasonable should people agree that the leaks – and the NYT’s evident inside connections to the CIA – should be vigorously investigated. The paper’s reporters want to be the next Woodward and Bernstein and nothing like the small issue of national security or getting people killed through their irresponsible babbling will stop them from that endeavor.
There should be an investigation, and an intensive one.
My question is, though, will the Eric Holder-led Justice Department actually do one? We’re watching them actively ignore a clear case of racially motivated voter intimidation, and we’re watching them pursue CIA interrogators who were cleared five years ago. Will they initiate an investigation into who the leakers are, and who their outside handlers may be?
I doubt it.
They may take a swipe at it for PR’s sake, but I doubt they’ll pursue the leakers with the same zeal with which they’re set to pursue those mean ol’ interrogators.
Of course, I could be wrong.
One more thing – the left will squeal that it’s the responsibility of the press to watch our government for abuses and keep it in check. They’re right. It is.
But – when they start looking at the current administration and its surrounding circle of tax cheats, far left ideologues, and downright shady characters with the same degree of intensity that they display any time anyone from the Bush Administration era is mentioned I’ll feel a bit better about their professionalism – and their intent.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array SigFan

    I hope they do investigate the leaks, but sincerely doubt they will for one simple reason. It will expose those guilty of treason and you can bet the farm they’re tangled up in the current admin up to their eyeballs. They’ll simply bury this under the guise of “national security” (which to some extent is true), and hope that the public forgets about it along with the growing list of other outrages this admin is perpetrating.

    I’m not a big Panetta supporter, but at least on this one he’s got it right. This crap has to stop!

  • Bat One

    Justice Byron White, hardly an original intent conservative, wrote the following in (ironically) New York Times Co. v. United States:

    Section 798, [n6] also in precise language, proscribes knowing and willful publication of any classified information concerning the cryptographic systems [p736] or communication intelligence activities of the United States, as well as any information obtained from communication intelligence operations. [n7] If any of the material here at issue is of this nature, the newspapers are presumably now on full notice of the position of the United States, and must face the consequences if they [p737] publish. I would have no difficulty in sustaining convictions under these sections on facts that would not justify the intervention of equity and the imposition of a prior restraint.

    The same would be true under those sections of the Criminal Code casting a wider net to protect the national defense. Section 793(e) [n8] makes it a criminal act for any unauthorized possessor of a document “relating to the national defense” either (1) willfully to communicate or cause to be communicated that document to any person not entitled to receive it or (2) willfully to retain the document and fail to deliver it to an officer of the United States entitled to receive it.

    Over the past 8 years, the NY Times and its reporters and editors have repeatedly violated Title 18 of the US Code. Those violations should be investigated, prosecuted, and punished. The individuals who have been leaking intelligence information from inside the intelligence community are equally guilty and should be prosecuted and sent to prison.

    There is little hope that a corrupt, political hack like Eric Holder, or his boss, will pursue these cases, but someone, someplace heeds to grow the balls to put an end to the leaks.

  • robert108

    It’s about time those leaks were investigated. I hope we see some prosecutions.

  • Lioncourt

    The NYT won that case.

  • Bat One

    The NYT won that case.

    Hardly the point considering what “Whizzer” White said in that quote. The material at issue in that case was ruled not to be covered by Sections 793, 794, 797, and 798. The suggestion that the information leaked and published about the NSA terrorist surveillance programs, in time of war, was similarly not covered by those sections, is laughable, and only a pluperfect idiot like Anna Digs Taylor would even entertain the thought.

  • jimmypop

    an bush didnt do this why?

  • Bat One

    jimmy,

    Good point! Many of us have been asking the same question.

    18 § 798. Disclosure of classified information

    (a) Whoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information–

    (3) concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government;

    Note that those who PUBLISH the subject information are also guilty of a felony and subject to a fine and up to 10 years in prison. To me, that means the two NYT reporters, their editors, and Sulzburger himself ought to all be in prison.

    That the Bush DoJ didn’t pursue this is unconscionable.

  • Pilgrim

    That the Bush DoJ didn’t pursue this is unconscionable.

    Agreed. This should have been nipped in the bud a long time ago.

  • Lioncourt

    Hardly the point considering what “Whizzer” White said in that quote.

    Why don’t you quote Brennan’s concurring opinion, it is as valid as White’s.

  • Lioncourt

    Note that those who PUBLISH the subject information are also guilty of a felony and subject to a fine and up to 10 years in prison. To me, that means the two NYT reporters, their editors, and Sulzburger himself ought to all be in prison.
    That the Bush DoJ didn’t pursue this is unconscionable.

    Maybe they didn’t want to lose and have the whole law struck down.

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    It’s about time those leaks were investigated. I hope we see some prosecutions.

    Yeah that’s going to happen under Holder, the man is a political hack and wouldn’t prosecute the black panters in Philly for intimidating voters what makes anyone thing this clown can get it right?

  • 2Hotel9

    We can have a demonstration outside DeptJustice and chant “Valerie, Valerie, Valerie”, that should about do it. Maybe all where McChe shirts, too!

  • wowbagger the infinitely prolo

    If the CIA were the omnipotent killbot force libs have had orgasms over for the past 30 years wouldn’t the CIA be address leakers and their families in an efficient killbot manor instead of asking the DOJ to investigate?

  • EnigmaCypher

    It never hurts for the Liberals to demonize the CIA as somehow equivalent to the Gestapo or NKVD.

  • EnigmaCypher

    It never hurts for the Liberals to demonize the CIA as somehow equivalent to the Gestapo or NKVD.

  • EnigmaCypher

    It never hurts for the Liberals to demonize the CIA as somehow equivalent to the Gestapo or NKVD.

  • EnigmaCypher

    It never hurts for the Liberals to demonize the CIA as somehow equivalent to the Gestapo or NKVD.

  • EnigmaCypher

    It never hurts for the Liberals to demonize the CIA as somehow equivalent to the Gestapo or NKVD.

  • http://www.rabidamerican.net/ Rabid American

    Commie politicians against the CIA????

    I’ll take my odds with the CIA….. ;-)

    It could get REAL inter-tainin’…….

  • EnigmaCypher

    I apologize for posting that comment five times. I meant to do it only once, my computer’s been acting up lately though.

  • http://unreligiousright.blogspot.com/ UNRR

    This post has been linked for the HOT5 Daily 9/5/2009, at The Unreligious Right

  • WOOFX

    Blitzer then revealed that he had discussed the Khan case with US National Security Adviser Condaleeza Rice on background. He reported that she had admitted that the Bush administration had in fact revealed Khan’s name to the press.

    He also reports that 5 al-Qaeda cell members were able to escape capture because of this:

    The British MI5 was forced to have the London cell of 13 arrested immediately on Tuesday, fearing that they would flee now that they knew Khan had been arrested two weeks earlier.

    Where’s Scooter?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development