Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, September 10, 2006

Censorship

This, more than any concern over "who gets the blame" in Path to 9/11, is what has got me steamed:

NEW YORK With the first part of the controversial “The Path to 9/11″ movie set to air on ABC in the U.S. tonight, no one yet knows exactly what scene or lines may have been cut since criticism of the movie ramped up this week.


Because one political party here in America decided that it didn't like some of the politically-themed content of a privately-produced film that film got edited, and Americans may never get to see the film as it was intended.

Which isn't to think that this film is all that important. I just don't like how the Democrats threw a fit and made threats trying to get this film pulled. They didn't get it pulled, but they did get some changes...and that's pathetic. If they'd simply threatened to boycott ABC and/or its advertisers that would have been one thing, but they went further than that. They threatened to use government power to pull ABC's broadcast license. That's a whole 'nother ballgame.

What an absolute loss for free speech. If President Bush had tried to pressure Michael Moore into editing or even canning Fahrenheit 9/11 the left would have been screaming about "fascism" being on the march (as if they aren't anyway) and the ACLU would have filed a zillion lawsuits.

Bush gets a lot of nasty rhetoric about "totalitarianism" and "fascism" and "loss of civil liberties" thrown at him, but it isn't his administration or the Republicans using government power to try and silence private film makers.

Comments

Avatar for chuck

i never cease to be underwhelmed, by the “blather” of the the people that take no responsibility for defense of this country or themselves. i’ve spent the majority of my adult life working for this “conspiracy laden goverment”
i’m the guy carrying a gun/rifle insuring your right to act like a complete and total idiot…
but for the clintons to scream like a bunch of drunken sorority girls...is too damn much
for harry reid, and hillary to complain....be carefull....we might just stand down and let ya’ll get what you want

chuck on September 10, 2006 at 06:57 pm
Avatar for FreeRepublicans.com

Well clearly the Clintonistas were upset because it was exactly what we all thought it was.

Of course, I was not aware of the simliarlities between our pre-1998 operations and the Bay of Pigs.

FreeRepublicans.com on September 10, 2006 at 07:19 pm

The Dems are desperate to keep the truth from the American people that they are not the Party of national security. They were successful in this area by preventing the Swift Boat Veterans from running their movie, and they desperately wanted to do the same thing here.  Nothing complex about it.  On the fifth anniversary of this world-changing event, it is very important to know how it happened, no matter who gets some of the blame.  It should just be the right people, that’s all.


Leftie political philosophy, from a DU commenter:

It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not. RUMOR IS TRUTH. The modern laws of media hype and political warfare have a useful tenet: Repeat ANYTHING or raise false concern over ANYTHING and it is likely to be planted in the conscious/subconscious of many voters.

robert108 on September 10, 2006 at 10:22 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.