Say Anything Blog

There is no Al Qaeda in Iraq…we nee to move our troops to Afghanistan so we can fight Al Qaeda there.

Proving once again that Harry Reid, whose only military training or experience was as a part time rent-a-cop at night during law school, simply hasn’t a clue.

“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

The voice heard in the recordings belonged to an Iraqi actor, the military said.

Combine this with real news stories about large scale fake beheadings and this has got to be one of the strangest wars ever.  AQ, realizing it’s dangerous to ‘actually’ kill a pile of people gets the AP to release a story of a non-event on a fairly regular basis. 

This is not a WagTheDog situation, exactly, what would you call it?  When the dust settles it will make a fascinating read in the history books. 

When Saddam was a terrorist-supporting bad guy in the 90’s the X-Files did a spoofing where Michael McKean was the govt agent that hired the actor to play Saddam so we could have a bad guy.

Let the Iraqis fight the fucking terrorists. It’s their country. We defend ours they defend theirs.

ellinas,

The defense of these United States is, and must needs be, a defense in depth.  It also redounds to our huge advantage to do what fighting needs done on someone else’s dirt.

The terrorists (the enemies of all civilized persons) are making a stand in Iraq.  Killing them there is in the best interests not only of the United States, but of mankind.

Here endeth the lesson.

Out Here
Rodney G. Graves
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ceterum censeo Parthia esse delendam
Latin: “Furthermore, Parthia (Persia aka modern day Iran) should be destroyed.”

There are also tons of terrorists in Kashmir, India, Pakistan, Phillipines, Egypt, Malaysia, Indonesia, Russia, Sudan, Somalia, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuella, North Korea, Colombia and numerous other countries.
Lets go fight them there too. Why limit our war on terror to Iraq? Man o’ man…. If we don’t get them there, we certainly will have to fight them here. Not a good prospect. I for one shit my pants from fear.

There are also tons of terrorists in Kashmir, India, Pakistan, Phillipines, Egypt, Malaysia, Indonesia, Russia, Sudan, Somalia, Peru, Bolivia, Venezuella, North Korea, Colombia and numerous other countries.

And Grease (sic)

1% of Americans pay 40% of the income tax.
5% of Americans pay 60% of the income tax.
10% of Americans pay 70% of the income tax.

Let the Iraqis fight the fucking terrorists. It’s their country. We defend ours they defend theirs

.

The terrorists are fighting against America. The Sunnis and Shiites are mostly killing each other; and, by pure serendipity, when we deposed Saddam the Islamic terrorists like Al Queda decided to take their battle against America to Iraq, because we were there and whether you like it or not, the global battle against Islamic Fundamentalism which we must fight and win is now centered in Iraq. If we defeat the Islamic Jihadists there, we will strike a severe morale blow against their militaristic, murderous strategy; on the other hand if we leave Iraq short of a clear victory, it will be interpreted by the Islamic Jihadists as a military victory against the United States and the West, and it will embolden them to drive us out of Saudi Arabia, Kuwaiit and the Middle East. They have already shown us their hold card, terrorism in Europe and here at home, so if we keep them busy in Iraq until we win there, they will only minimally hit the West, if they win by our cowardly withdrawal (surrender), they will step up their activities elsewhere.

Now, shall we deliver a serious body blow to the Islamic Jihadists in Iraq or shall we leave there short of a clear victory and thereby increase the intensity of the flame of global Jihad under the leadership of Iran to our own peril? Come on, make a choice!

In keeping silent about evil, in burying it deep within us, so that it appears nowhere on the surface, we are implanting it, and it will rise up a thousandfold in the future.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago

ellinas,

Surely there is something at which you are more demonstrably capable than this embarrassing attempt at sarcasm.

Of the 15 places you’ve named, Islamist terrorists are known to operate in 10. (while it is not publicly known whether there are Islamist terrorist operations in the SA countries you’ve named both Hebollah and Hamas are in the “triangle” area of Paraguay.)

Saying we should fight them here is glib, but not nearly as clever as it may sound.  Yo treat terrorism as a law enforcement problem means, by definition, that we wait for them to strike, like a rapist or a bank robber and then go after the perpetrator.  Doing it your way only ensures that they are successful, and leaves a lot of innocent American victims too.

“Capitalism is optimism monetized.”

elinas,

One or two at a time works.  We’ll get around to any others that require our attention as time and circumstances permit.

And I see there is a reason for your brown breeches and yellow hose.

Out Here
Rodney G. Graves
(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Ceterum censeo Parthia esse delendam
Latin: “Furthermore, Parthia (Persia aka modern day Iran) should be destroyed.”

And Grease (sic)
The Whistler on July 19, 2007 at 01:15 pm

Oooppss…. Sory Whistler, you are right.

Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, Israel, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Morroco, Yemen, etc, etc, etc.

Bat One, the other countries (non Islamic)I added for good measure (actualy to pad my list).
But I offer you my sincere congratulations and admiration on the ” “triangle” area of Paraguay”. I bet a lot of people forgot the Islamoterrorist bombings against Jewish interests in that area.

Pakistan is the front in the war on terror. Most of the foreign fighters in Iraq are from Saudi Arabia, another ally. Hmmm. Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, our allies are the major terrorists?

Under bush, Al Qaeda is stronger than ever.

The non Al Qaeda resistance groups have a right to fight occupiers, just as you or I would if our country was occupied. The indiscriminate killings of civilians makes Iraqis hate Al Qaeda, as well as the occupiers.

Al Qaeda wouldn’t stand a chance in Iraq with the US gone.

What Iraq needs is a Tito or De Gaulle, someone that fought off the American occupation and Al Qaeda quasi-occupation and is seen as legitimate head of state for Iraq. Some Sunni groups are anti-Al Qaeda, nationalists (they don’t accept money weapons, etc.. from other countries) and have expressed the desire to work with Shia groups. They wouldn’t take kindly to being our client state like the current Vichy Iraq government.

The “military option” has been a complete failure in fighting extremists. It has been great creating them.