Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Can School Vouchers Improve Our Health As Well As Our Education?

School vouchers are a controversial subject here in America.  They are opposed, fiercely, by teachers’ unions and so-called “civil rights” groups even as the countries that use them beat our country badly in test scores and the few times they’ve been used here in the U.S. has met rousing success.

Health care is another important and controversial issue in this country.  Many complain that not every American has access to health insurance and that many Americans would be leading longer, healthier lives if only they had access to better health care.  Some even go so far as to suggest that we should create a massive new health care entitlement funded by our tax dollars and administered by the government to give every citizen of this country health care.  Yet a new study indicates that better education, and not massive health care entitlements, may well be the best way to improve the health of citizens of any country.  America included.

From the New York Times:

The one social factor that researchers agree is consistently linked to longer lives in every country where it has been studied is education. It is more important than race; it obliterates any effects of income.

Year after year, in study after study, says Richard Hodes, director of the National Institute on Aging, education “keeps coming up.”

And, health economists say, those factors that are popularly believed to be crucial — money and health insurance, for example, pale in comparison.

Dr. Smith explains: “Giving people more Social Security income, or less for that matter, will not really affect people’s health. It is a good thing to do for other reasons but
not for health.”

Health insurance, too, he says, “is vastly overrated in the policy debate.”

Instead, Dr. Smith and others say, what may make the biggest difference is keeping young people in school. A few extra years of school is associated with extra years of life and vastly improved health decades later, in old age.

So let’s review:

  • School vouchers or parental choice programs for education has resulted in better test scores, and better overall education, every single time they’ve been tried.
  • Study after study has concluded that better education in a society leads to better health.

So given those two realities, why do liberals and unions and “civil rights” leaders oppose school vouchers when they can improve our education and our health?  Why is it that, for them, the only viable option for both education and health care is larger government and more government control over our personal decisions?  Are these people really interested in what is best for this country, or are they really just interested in what is best for them?

Like more government authority for those big-government liberals.

And less accountability and more pay for those teacher’s unions.

And more victimhood to exploit for those “civil rights” leaders.

Comments

Rob… you’re on your honeymoon!!!!


Carol's signature
Carol on January 3, 2007 at 01:05 pm

Now he’s got his mom nagging him too.  Poor guy.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on January 3, 2007 at 01:09 pm

Now he’s got his mom nagging him too.  Poor guy.

Just don’t want the marriage to break up before I get the pictures.


Carol's signature
Carol on January 3, 2007 at 01:13 pm
Avatar for NDGAL

FYI I am not the nagger sister!  I am the “cool” sister.  But don’t tell the other 3!

NDGAL on January 3, 2007 at 01:14 pm

So Carol you expect Rob to give up Blogging cold turkey?


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on January 3, 2007 at 01:31 pm
Avatar for Robert Perry

Personally, I wonder how the education correlation survives when “family status” is accounted for.  Also, looking in the article, there are a number of other facts--also apparently statistically significant--indicating that the factor at hand may not be education.

It should also be noted that the period of time over which the researcher looked also involved the greatest extent of public health initiatives ever--sanitary sewers, automobiles replacing horses (and manure), vaccination, pasteurization, penicillin, etc..  To look at education here is to look at (at best) the #9 or #10 item on the Pareto chart without addressing #1 and #2.

Never mind the obvious jab; illiteracy has gone up as the number of years required for education increases.  Perhaps we should argue that we live longer if we’re dumber?

Robert Perry on January 3, 2007 at 03:13 pm
Avatar for Will

You’ve unwittingly revealed the secret to Bush’s Social Security reform program:

if you’re not smart enough to manage your own retirement wisely, it doesn’t matter, because you probably won’t live long enough to need it.

Will on January 4, 2007 at 07:17 am
Avatar for Robert Perry

But Will, don’t forget that the correlation is not to intelligence or ability, but rather years spent in a classroom.  Unfortunately, the correlation between the two is not as tight as the NEA would like us to believe.

That said, though, why should official policy deprive the less educated or intelligent of the fruits of their labor by using their Socialist Insecurity taxes to subsidize the retirement of the more educated?

Robert Perry on January 4, 2007 at 08:39 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.