Can Free Trade Win The War On Terror?

One of the biggest facilitators of Islamic terrorism is poor economic conditions in the middle east. And one big reason why economic conditions in the middle east exist is that big economic players, particularly America, tax certain imports from middle eastern nations at ridiculous rates thus inhibiting industry.
So how can we fix that? End some of the economic protectionism that is also choking our economy.

…apart from oil, very little comes from the Muslim world. The 30 majority-Muslim states of the greater Middle East, from Morocco through Egypt to Pakistan and Central Asia, account for about 10% of the world’s population. They provide about 1% of our manufactured imports, and an even smaller fraction of our farm imports.
Between 1980 and 2000, their share of world trade fell by 75%, and their share of investment fell even faster. The region’s unemployment rate became the world’s highest, rising to an average of 25% for young people. With the region’s population rising by nearly a quarter-billion, the high unemployment rates mean a pool of perhaps 25 million jobless and sometimes hopeless young people, often easy targets for fundamentalists.
Will oil — now selling at record prices — put these legions to work? Historical experience is not promising. Oil can bring in money, but it also centralizes wealth and power. The effects mark a strong contrast with factory and farm exports, where revenue is spread more evenly through the working public.
Apart from gasoline, we rarely find consumer products from the Muslim world stocking our shelves (apart from the shirts and shoes trickling in from Turkey, Egypt and Pakistan). In part, that is because our tariff system makes life harder for developing countries. A Japanese car, for example, is subject to a mere 2.5% tariff, a Chinese TV 5%, and European medicines are subject to no import tax at all. Likewise, oil and natural gas get a nominal 0.1% tariff.
But tariffs on the items that are most important to developing economies are much higher. Clothes are subject to an import tax that averages 14.5% and can run as high as 32%. Luggage is taxed just as heavily. Shoe tariffs rise to 48%.

Unfortunately, many here in America care more about protecting inflated union wages and perpetuating certain monopolies than mutual prosperity through fair trade.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array atease

    Makes a good read, but that is all. Which government in the mid east do you want to buy stuff from..? Iraq maybe as they get back on their feet. Iran, never. Saudi, shoot, they don’t make a damn thing, they just buy. Syria, see Iran.

    Saying we should purchase more looks good on paper. But I would prefer to buy from friendlier nations.

    atease

  • robert108

    If we stop funding out opposition with our penchant for cheap plastic shit and oil…

    Wrong again; it’s with the Dem penchant for sacrificing the energy needs of the American people to pander to the envirofringies. All we have to do is clear away the Dem obstruction, and our market economy will take care of the rest.
    Again you demonstrate your partisan ignorance, Sparkie!

  • dragon poker

    What will we trade? Just wondering, cuz as far as I know, all the stuff we like is made in asia. I assume they will like the same stuff when they join the 21st century….HDTV, IPODS, computers, cameras… Are we gonna sell them food? Are we gonna sell em new roads? Bridges? Water purification plants? Do we have the corner on any products they might want or need? Why wouldnt they just keep taking our cash for their oil, and buy what they want or need from asia like everyone else? They sure dont want our entertainment and culture, so what is it we can trade with them?
    I think free trade to the middle east is a good idea, Im just unclear…does free trade mean we trade our cash for their oil?

  • robert108

    Rob: Good one! The real problem is the leftie isolationists who are afraid to offend their union thugs, and so continue to support restrictive legislation, taxation and regulation to try to force us to buy what they want us to buy.
    I think the ultimate solution to world peace is when we all care more for others as customers, rather than as enemies. Ideology has to go, replaced by honest commerce.

  • robert108

    Rob: One criticism; you don’t discuss the effect on economic activity resulting from the spread of radical, fundamentalist Islam, which doesn’t believe in either economic growth, investment for profit, or even doing business past the level of subsistence.

  • robert108

    you think the UAE is pro-capitalism?

    No; you just made that up. You know, it is possible to trade with people who don’t have an identical economic system to ours; are you really ignorant of that fact?

    you are the one who has been defending the saudis.

    Another lie; I have stated that they are our allies, which is true. You continue to make things up, Sparkie! Without fabricating bullshit, do you have any argument at all?

    Nice off-topic rant, but I was addressing your ignorance of the true cause of our buying more foreign oil than we should be buying. It’s due to obstructionist Dem/enviro legislation, and you know it, Sparkie, if you have a speck of intelligence.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    I think you may have excluded some variables from your analysis. Our ‘allies’ like the Saudis… have a ton of money and are not warm to democracy or capitalism. As with Pakistan, Iraq, Venezuela, China, etc. If we stop funding out opposition with our penchant for cheap plastic shit and oil… perhaps we could stick it to them. In the meantime, that’s what stands in our way. We protect the ‘supply lines’ and out enemies straddle them, kiss our asses, and take potshots at us when we aren’t looking.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/sparkiearbuckle sayanything-81

    r108
    you are the only one demonstrating partisan ignorance. you think the UAE is pro-capitalism? only so they can fund the opposite. same with saudi arabia. you are the one who has been defending the saudis. bush loves em. pakistan? who spent all that money? how about all the anti-capitalist former russian states above china and Afghanistan? don’t be selective and accuse me of it. i indict the dems and your party.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Saying we should purchase more looks good on paper. But I would prefer to buy from friendlier nations.

    Well the middle east is larger than you describe. Iraq and Afghanistan should have open access to our markets without restrictive tariffs. There’s also Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Tajikistan that could benefit from increased connection to our economy.

    Access to our country isn’t going to work where there isn’t some semblance of individual and economic freedom (read: not Iran or Syria) but there’s no reason to punish countries we do have trade relationships with.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development