Bush’s Interview With Elizabeth Vargas

Bush was interviewed tonight by ABC News’ Elizabeth Vargas. You can read the transcript/watch the video here.
This was my favorite part.

VARGAS: I know you don’t read the polls. You have said that many, many times.
BUSH: So what are you going to do, ask me about a poll?
VARGAS: I am going to ask about a poll, just the most recent poll that’s out today that does have your approval rating at an all-time low for your administration. You don’t care about that, but you have talked a lot about political capital, the importance of it, the value of it, your intention to use it. Do you think you have political capital right now?
BUSH: I’ve got ample capital and I’m using it to spread freedom and to protect the American people, plus we’ve got a strong agenda to keep this economy growing. The economy is strong. A good, healthy rate last year, productivity is up, we’re creating jobs. The unemployment rate’s 4.7 percent nationally. I mean, this is a strong economy.
And I talked to the Congress about how to make sure that we remain the leader in the world when it comes to economic vitality and growth for the good of our own people. And we’ve got a good, strong agenda, and I’m confident we’ll be able to get a lot of the agenda through the Congress, including changing how we drive cars, getting unhooked from oil; including a competitiveness initiative that encourages research and development as well as educating children in math and science; health initiatives that empower the consumer and make sure the doctor-patient relationship is central to health care, health savings accounts.
We’ve got a very robust agenda, and I’m confident we’ll get it through.
VARGAS: So you’re not worried about that at all?
BUSH: No, listen, you know, I know people make a big deal out of these things. If I worried about polls, I would be — I wouldn’t be doing my job. And, look, I fully understand that when you do hard things, it creates consternation at times. And, you know, I’ve been up in the polls, and I’ve been down in the polls. You know, it’s just part of life in the modern era.
I think the American people — I know the American people want somebody to stand on principle, decide, make decisions and stand by them, and to lead this world toward a more peaceful tomorrow. And I strongly believe we are doing that, and I’m — I got to tell you, I’m enjoying it. It’s a fantastic opportunity.

Exactly.
The President doesn’t rule by polls. He’s doing the right things for the right reasons, critics be damned.
I admire that, even if I don’t always agree with what he’s doing.

Tags: ,


«
»
  • michael w

    you cerntainly can't take away from the fact that Mr. Bush is a principled person.  And, he is sticking to his principles, that's great to see.  Like you, I disagree with those principles, but that is democracy.  I would hate to have a man/woman (like that?) in the Oval who could not stand by their principles, that would be a sad day for America.Oh yeah, I LOVE ELIZABETH VARGAS!!! 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Mike, I don't necessarily disagree with the President's principles.  I agree with most of the things he says.  Its the things he does (refusing to veto outrageous amounts of spending, signing campaign finance reform, the guest worker program, etc.) that get me angry.

  • robert108

    Rob: Whenever I get away from the good stuff, like going after the terrorists and tax cuts, I consider the alternatives: Gore and Kerry, and I feel a whole lot better.  Demanding perfection before acting is the mark of the frightened child.

  • richard

    And the deficit spins out of control.I do have to agree though Bush does stand by his guns some times to a fault, but I would much rather have that than a President that tries to please everybody knowing from word one that he never can.

  • richard

    How does sticking by your guns make you automatically principled is beyond me. I am sure that Hillary coinsiders herself principled. What you are defining as pricipled some would call stubborn.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    Most of my distain for Clinton (both of them) is in how they govern based upon polls.  Too many polls are answered by people who don't yet have all the facts.  Polls are subjective.  How do you feel about [insert topic]?  Most businesses are trying to reduce subjectivity in all areas relating to decision making.  Subjective decisions can change based upon what you ate for breakfast or how much sleep you got.   When a politician makes governing decisions based upon people's feelings, then he's going for the short term, 'get people to like me', win.   My impression of Bush is that he would rather make decisions based upon fact.  Objectivity!  We need more of that.  

  • Mark

    Seth –
    That trait has spread this side of the Atlantic – it's called 'focus group' politics.

    There are very few 'conviction' politicians left – i.e. those that are independent, have their own ideas and are prepared to argue for them, rather than just shaping what they believe around what will get them elected.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Seth,   Good perspective, especially on the "feelings" point and, of course, on the "want people to like me".   Someone wrote a piece on that a while ago along the lines of the "wonder (teen) years"  —   "does she really, really like me"?

  • Tom_with_a_Dream

    I'd like to see Hillary Principaled, a al Jim Belushi…  Just sayin'.

  • Puzzlefeet

    Aprincipled person? Bush?  Now we find out and can see and hear it with our own eyes and ears that Bush was warned before Katrina that the levees could fail.  He heard it, he discussed.  Yet he tells the world that "no one anticipated the levees would fail."  He lied, he flatout lied.  He knew, he was warned, these tapes are amazing. It was anticipated, discussed.  Unbelievable, yup principled alright.

  • robert108

    P: "Could have" is not certainty.  Stop lying yourself.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Puzzlefeet, Bush is not directly in charge of New Orleans or Lousiana.  The mayor and the governor were, respectively.If you want to point fingers, put it at them.   We have a federalist system for a reason.Its their state.

  • Tom_with_a_Dream

    I once that a spoon "could have" floated up off the table…  :) Good luck Robert… 

  • http://Array Puzzlefeet

    You all are missing the point intentionally.  Yes, everyone had some responsibility.  But our commander in chief lied to everyone.  It was clear from the tape that it was anticipated that the levees could be breeched and it was discussed before the breech.  It was discussed with Bush in the room.  And then he goes on TV and tells the nation that no one anticipated that there would be a breech.  He sat there in a room with Chertoff, Brown, the weather service people when it was discussed that a breech was anticipated.You guys are unbelieveable.  even in black and white and in living color he said, he heard and then baldfacedly lied to the American people.  It's a lie, he lied and nothing you write changes what is on that tape.  Again, Bush, principled, pulease!

  • Puzzlefeet

    Even Fox news is running it on their website:  http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,186525,00.htm….  He was warned and said they were prepared. 

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Have you seen the tape, Puzzle?  Because I haven't.  All we have is a summary from some AP reporter (you say "even Fox News," yet that link goes to an AP wire story on the Fox News website, it isn't a Fox News story), and that isn't enough to go on for me.Before I buy into this I want to see the documents and the video itself. not a summary of it from some reporter.There are also some questions as to the claims made by the article (you can read a summary of them here).

  • Puzzlefeet

    Actually I have watched the tape. It is on the Fox News site as well. You should take a look as well.  Very interesting and supports what I wrote.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Actually, you watched an AP broadcast that had selected clips from the video.  Not exactly the same as seeing the original.

  • robert108

    P: Once again, the luxury of 20/20 hindsight.  Before the tragedy, someone said the levees "could be" breached, which, in my memory, gets said every hurricane season.  This is a "cry wolf" story turned into the leftie "Get the President" mantra.  Blame everything, acknowledge nothing.  It is really getting boring.  If you want a psychic President, include that in the job description.  Maybe if GW had been down there on the levees pitching sandbags, you would have found something wrong with that, as well.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Robert, I still think it is an important distinction to note that nobody said the levees would be breached.  Topped, yes, but not breeched.Two entirely different situations, whether the lefties choose to see it that way or not. 

  • robert108

    Rob: Exactly.  The story of the MSM reporting Katrina is a litany of lies and half-truths.  It was a scandal, really, but you will hear very little about that part of it, because they still have a virtual monopoly on the public concsciousness.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Puzzlefeet drivels on, You all are missing the point intentionally. Yes, everyone had some responsibility. But our commander in chief lied to everyone. It was clear from the tape that it was anticipated that the levees could be breeched and it was discussed before the breech. It was discussed with Bush in the room. And then he goes on TV and tells the nation that no one anticipated that there would be a breech. Puzzlefeet – get a new hearing aid. The tape showed someone who said that the possibility of the levees being topped is a concern. He didn't say "breeched". No lie. Go ahead an watch it again. You guys are unbelieveable. even in black and white and in living color he said, he heard and then baldfacedly lied to the American people. It's a lie, he lied and nothing you write changes what is on that tape. Again, Bush, principled, pulease! *sigh* I think you might be a willfull fool.

    "I don't think any model can tell you with any confidence right now whether the levees will be topped or not but that is obviously a very, very grave concern," Mayfield told the briefing.

    "TOPPED" You may now continue your screeching and squawking. "he lied squawk!" "he lied squawk!"

  • Tom_with_a_Dream

    "squawk" – Funny!

  • 2Hotel9

    Having lived behind levees during hurricane season I can assure you this is said every time a storm is inbound. Hell, it is said every time there is flooding up north on the Ohio and Mississippi river basins.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development