Bush To Veto SCHIP Expansion In Favor Of…Universal Health Care?

Bush is for universal health care?

Clinton unveiled her plan as Health and Human Services Secretary Mike Leavitt said President Bush wants to achieve universal health care before he leaves office.
Leavitt told the USA TODAY editorial board that Bush will veto a Democratic plan emerging from Congress that would add $35 billion in taxpayer subsidies to the Children’s Health Insurance Program over five years. In doing so, Leavitt said, Bush will urge Congress to join him in seeking coverage for all Americans.
“He’d like to see the larger debate begin,” Leavitt said. “The very best opportunity we have may well be in the next 15 months.”

That’s got to be wrong. I notice the reporter doesn’t quote Leavitt correctly, but attributes the “universal health care” term to him. I’d be willing to wager that Bush, and Leavitt, didn’t mean “universal health care” in the way liberals mean it. Rather, they likely favor policies that allow people to better cover themselves rather than policies that charge the government with providing health care.
Thats where the Bush administration has been so far, and I find it hard to believe that the stubborn Bush would be shifting on that now.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://thenewpundit.com/ Douglas Ragan

    Bush has been pushing for reform that helps bring down the cost of coverage since he took office. He wants reform, not subsidies.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    I agree, Doug. I think the reporter is likely mischaraterizing Leavitt's statements.

  • Neiman

    Bush is looking for a legacy, something to overcome the Iraq War in the minds of the voters. Sorry, I just would not put this past him.

  • syn

    "Bush is looking for a legacy, something to overcome the Iraq War in the minds of the voters"

    Bush is a running for President? Who knew!

    That said, a legacy is something handed down from the the past, therefore the results of Bush's policies won't be known until well into the future.

    Sorta like Reagan's legacy of ending the Cold War…at the moment it happened many thought he was a warmonger intent on destroying the world, of course his legacy proved otherwise.

    Or like Johnson's "Great Society' legacy which at the time seemed like a utopian dream… of course turns out his legacy produced a nightmare welfare state of people stuck inside a socialist slave planation run buy really smart liberal thinkers.

  • syn

    Pardon me, what I really meant to type was 'by' please don't shoot me just yet.

  • http://www.HealthInsuranceShopper.com/ California group hea

    I'd be willing to wager that Bush, and Leavitt, didn't mean "universal health care" in the way liberals mean it. Rather, they likely favor policies that allow people to better cover themselves rather than policies that charge the government with providing health care.

    That has to be right.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development