Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, October 31, 2007

Bush Nominates Ed Schafer As New Ag Secretary

Wow…

WASHINGTON - President Bush will nominate Ed Schafer, a former two-term Republican governor from North Dakota, to be his next secretary of agriculture, a senior administration official said today.

Schafer, who chose not to run again in North Dakota in 2000, will replace Mike Johanns, who resigned as U.S. agriculture secretary last month to launch a bid for the Nebraska Senate seat being vacated by Republican Chuck Hagel at the end of next year.

Bush will make the announcement at 2 p.m. EDT in the Roosevelt Room.

Schafer (who, I might add, is a frequent reader of this blog via Super Alerts) deserves this.  He’ll be appointed quickly, because I can’t imagine on what grounds anyone could oppose him.

I’m a little disappointed that Ed didn’t mention this while we were on the New Media Panel together this last weekend at the NDGOP Roundup.  Ed, if you’re reading this, how about helping a lowly blogger out with a scoop now and then?

Update: Good point from the comments:

It is noteworthy that Bush has nominated many SITTING governors in the past (Johanns, Ridge, T. Thompson, et. al).  I wonder what kind of gyrations are going on in the ivory tower in Bismarck at this news.

Who knows.  Hoeven may not have wanted the job, or maybe the Bush administration passed Hoeven over after he snubbed their advances to get him to run against Senator Conrad.

Update: By the way, Schafer is a good pick for Ag Secretary not just because he’s a nice guy and was a very popular Governor here in North Dakota, but also because his political philosophy is grounded in sound trade and export philosophies.

Governor Schafer is strong supporter of trade and exports as a way to bolster the ag economy, a politically brave position to take in a state where too many politicians promote protectionism and subsidy as the sole path to prosperity. We would expect him to become another strong advocate of the pending free trade agreements, especially with the Latin American countries. The governor has traveled extensively abroad and speaks fluent Spanish.

This is a nomination conservatives should be very, very happy about.

Update: Here’s the White House fact sheet about Schafer.

Update: In the extended entry is the text of Schafer’s press conference with the President.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you all; be seated. Good afternoon. I’m proud to announce my nomination of Ed Schafer to be the next Secretary of Agriculture.

The Secretary of Agriculture heads a Cabinet department of more than 100,000 employees. I rely on the Secretary to provide sound advice on issues ranging from our nation’s farm economy and food supply to international trade and conservation programs. To carry out these responsibilities, the Secretary of Agriculture needs to be someone who understands the challenges facing America’s farmers, ranchers and consumers.

Ed Schafer is the right choice to fill this post. He was a leader on agricultural issues during his eight years as the governor of North Dakota. He worked to open new markets for North Dakota farmers and ranchers by expanding trade with China. He oversaw the development of the state’s agricultural biofuels industry. He helped families recover from natural disasters—including drought, fires and floods. And he pioneered innovative programs to increase economic opportunity in rural communities.

Ed also has extensive management experience in the private sector. Before running for public office, he was the president of the family-owned business that his dad started. He’s also launched a number of entrepreneurial ventures of his own. At every stage of his career, Ed has shown wisdom, foresight and creativity. Those same qualities will make him a valuable member of my Cabinet, and they will make him a trusted friend to America’s farmers and ranchers.

Ed’s passion for agriculture has deep roots. His maternal grandparents were Danish immigrants who worked as farmers on the plains of North Dakota. Ed has always kept their story close to his heart. And they’d be proud to see their grandson rise to become our nation’s top agriculture official.

In his new job, Ed will carry on the work of another fine public servant, Mike Johanns. Mike became Secretary of Agriculture at the beginning of my second term. During his time in office, he helped open new markets for trade, promoted renewable fuels and conservation and provided timely assistance to our farmers and ranchers devastated by natural disasters. Mike leaves a legacy of integrity and dedication. And Laura and I wish Mike and his wife, Stephanie, all the best on their return home to Nebraska.

I also thank my friend, Deputy Secretary of Agriculture Chuck Conner, for serving as Acting Secretary during this time of transition. Chuck grew up on a family farm in Indiana. He has a deep knowledge of agricultural issues. He’s done an outstanding job. Appreciate the fact that you will remain as Acting Secretary until the Senate confirms Ed as Mike Johanns’s permanent replacement. Thank you for joining us today.

Following Mike is not going to be easy—but Ed Schafer is up to the challenge. With Ed’s leadership, we will work with Congress to pass a farm bill that provides farmers with a safety net, protects our lands and the environment and spends federal tax dollars wisely. Ed will also join other members of my administration to continue leveling the playing field for America’s farm products by concluding the Doha Round of trade negotiations. And he and I will continue to work hard to open up new markets for American beef.

As Ed takes on these new challenges, he will rely on the support of his caring family. Ed is blessed with a wonderful wife, Nancy, who came from North Dakota today. He is also blessed with four children and eight grandchildren. Their love will give Ed the strength to serve our country in his new capacity.

I urge the Senate to swiftly confirm Ed Schafer as the 29th Secretary of Agriculture. I look forward to having this good and decent man as a member of my Cabinet. Congratulations.

MR. SCHAFER: Thank you, Mr. President. It is an honor to stand beside you today to accept this assignment. I appreciate the confidence that you have in me, and if I am confirmed, I’m looking forward to serving you and the people of the United States of America in your Cabinet as Secretary of Agriculture.

It is humbling to follow my friend, Secretary Johanns, into this position. And I hope that I can live up to the high standards of performance that he set at the agency. I’m also looking forward to working with you, Deputy Secretary Chuck Conner, who has faithfully served as the interim Secretary.

And if I am honored with a Senate confirmation, it will be a great pleasure to join forces with the dedicated, talented and loyal employees of the USDA to enhance our country’s vibrant agriculture economy, to advance renewable energy and protect America’s food supply, improve nutrition and health, and conserve our natural resources.

As you mentioned, Mr. President, my spouse, my true friend and the love of my life, Nancy, is here with us today, and I want to thank you, my dear, for all your support and encouragement and love that has been the driving force in my life.

I’m extremely proud of my heritage, and I would like to thank our grandparents and parents and children—in fact, our whole family—for the warm loving embrace in which you hold me always.

I also want to recognize the people of the great state of North Dakota. Throughout the years, they have supported, encouraged and nurtured me, and that has been tremendously uplifting.

Mr. President, I come from an agriculture state, as do you. Growing up in that arena, and focusing now on the USDA, I realize that the mission of this agency goes far beyond the services delivered to the preservation of a way of life that I believe is the foundation of this country.

I thank you again for the opportunity to serve the people of the United States, and if confirmed, I will do my very best to promote, preserve and enhance the mission of the United States Department of Agriculture.

It is my honor to serve this great country, and I thank God for guiding me here today. May he bless you, Mr. President, and may God bless America.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, sir.

END 2:13 P.M. EDT

Comments

Avatar for Maniac Conservative

If Dorgan and Conrad to want to prove how powerful they are, they will get this confirmation on the fast track to be done before they take Thanksgiving recess.

Maniac Conservative on October 31, 2007 at 09:42 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

This is a Bush nomination that’s going to be tough for them to oppose.  Ed Schafer is hugely popular in ND (more popular, I would say, than even Dorgan and Conrad).


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 31, 2007 at 09:45 am

Doesn’t mean they won’t try.  I sometimes wonder if either one of them listens to anyone in North Dakota.  Course, they pass as much Farm Aid as possible to keep the state happy.  That’ll only work for so long though.


Donkephant.net : Stuck in the middle with you

donkephant on October 31, 2007 at 09:48 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

It has worked for a very long time already.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 31, 2007 at 09:57 am
Avatar for Maniac Conservative

It is noteworthy that Bush has nominated many SITTING governors in the past (Johanns, Ridge, T. Thompson, et. al).  I wonder what kind of gyrations are going on in the ivory tower in Bismarck at this news. 

There must be some pretty upset folks down there who think that the current governor should have been picked for this.  Maybe the folks in DC decided a big spender isn’t what they want---finally.

Maniac Conservative on October 31, 2007 at 10:01 am

There must be some pretty upset folks down there who think that the current governor should have been picked for this.  Maybe the folks in DC decided a big spender isn’t what they want---finally.

Maybe George Bush hates us....


The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 31, 2007 at 10:51 am
Avatar for george

Ed is a great pick and will serve this nation and North Dakota well.

As for gyrations in the ivory tower, I doubt you will find anything but very pleased people for the very reason stated above. Even if offered, few, if any elected officials, especially those with announced election intents, would accept such an limited term appointment.

Just another reason Ed is a good choice and I wouldn’t be surprised to find out that Hoeven put in a good word to the White House.

Seems some in this group will take any opportunity to take a shot at Hoeven and dismiss any opportunity to give him credit. What is your agenda...advancing conservativism or ouster of Hoeven. Seems the Dems are loving your help to take back the legislature and Governor’s office.

george on October 31, 2007 at 10:51 am
Rob
Rob
17185 comments
Send a private message

Seems some in this group will take any opportunity to take a shot at Hoeven and dismiss any opportunity to give him credit. What is your agenda...advancing conservativism or ouster of Hoeven.

You assume that the two are mutually exclusive.

If Hoeven started leading like a conservative, there would be no reason for conservatives like us to “take shots” at him.

And I’m willing to bet that Hoeven doesn’t have a lot of credibility with this White House after he snubbed them on running against Conrad.  Snubbed them, that is, after he kept everyone on the hook waiting to see what he’d do.


The war against illegal plunder has been fought since the beginning of the world. But how is… legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this law without delay … If such a law is not abolished immediately it will spread, multiply and develop into a system.

Frédéric Bastiat, The Law

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on October 31, 2007 at 10:54 am

Maybe the Bush administration didn’t want to have someone working for them that ignores anyones legitimate concerns.


The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 31, 2007 at 11:24 am
Avatar for Maniac Conservative

I think the fact that Bush sent Karl Rove to ND to ask Hoeven to run against Conrad, and Hoeven declined, played a MAJOR role in this.  People will say not to read into this, but this is a MAJOR snub against Hoeven. 

Maybe Hoeven’s recent support of SCHIPs and Bush’s fierce opposition played a role as well. 

Hoeven’s track record of supporting liberal causes in the name of popularity over good policy may be catching up to him.

Maniac Conservative on October 31, 2007 at 11:42 am

I’m sure the Bush camp was afraid that Secretary Hoeven would take credit for everything good happening.

Oh wait, that’s not fair, it’s Hoeven’s Proxie’s that have been playing that game.


The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 31, 2007 at 12:57 pm

Yeah, but remember Ed snubbed the White House too.

This is a much less attractive job for a sitting governor now than a few years ago. Fact is, it’s only another 15 months or so. A former governor is in a perfect place to take the post.

I reckon Hoeven isn’t that beloved in the White House, but he probably doesn’t care except in the grand “want to be popular with everyone” sort of way. Ed, at least, had a personal connection with Bush before Bush became president, so there’s a bigger reserve of appreciation for Ed in the White House.

Nice remarks by both of them, Ed and the Prez.

Pomerdorgrad on October 31, 2007 at 01:31 pm

Yeah, but remember Ed snubbed the White House too.

Fair enough.  But then, Ed didn’t keep everyone on the hook waiting for a decision until the last minute.

Steve Cates on October 31, 2007 at 01:40 pm

From all I have read about Gov Schafer this is a good thing. He has a solid record as far as pushing legitimate ag concerns and a solid understanding of the ag industry. This makes me nervous, everytime W does something smart he turns right around pisses on the electric fence. Kinda scary.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 31, 2007 at 01:54 pm
Avatar for george

You are working awfully hard to make this a snub or assualt on Hoeven. How ridiculous is the thought?

It is a great thing for ND, but I doubt snubbing Hoeven had anything to do with the decision. Nor did GW play petty games with his appointment. Nor is Hoeven anything less than pleased to have a ND connection to this incredibly important office.

And you have to be crazy to think Hoeven should of run against Conrad in the tidewave election of 2006.

george on October 31, 2007 at 02:07 pm

And you have to be crazy to think Hoeven should of run against Conrad in the tidewave election of 2006

Right because if he had won he wouldn’t have been around to put North Dakota on the road to big government and high taxes.


The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 31, 2007 at 02:19 pm

That is what you meant, right Goerge?


The Debate is over!  Global Whining has been confirmed.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on October 31, 2007 at 02:20 pm

Nobody has to work at that, george, his leftarded policies and politics take care of that. Hell, I live in PA and know what a wanker Hoeven is. My 8 week old kitten is more conservative than Ho is.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on October 31, 2007 at 02:30 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.