Bush Administration Won’t Be Releasing Confidential Roberts Documents

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Bush administration does not want to release confidential memos that U.S. Supreme Court nominee John Roberts wrote when he worked for two Republican presidents, a White House adviser said on Sunday.
Former Sen. Fred Thompson, named by President Bush to steer Roberts’ confirmation through the Senate, disputed calls by some Democrats to turn over all the documents from Roberts’ tenure at the White House and Justice Department.
“The administration’s been pretty consistent on that, in fact, I think very consistent, in that (confidential documents) will not be forthcoming,” Thompson said during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
“Conversations he has with his priest, conversations he has with his doctor or his wife or his client are matters that are off limits, basically,” said Thompson, a Republican who represented Tennessee in the Senate.

This is the exact same tactic used by Democrats to obstruct the appointment of John Bolton as UN Ambassador. They make unprecedented requests for documents that no Presidential administration has ever released for the purpose of determining a candidates eligibility for any post. Then, when the Administration makes the predictable response of denying access to the documents, the Democrats make ominous sounds about things the administration might be hiding.
After all the time we’ve already spent on debating White House nominations over the past several years one would hope that Democrats could set aside partisan politics for a nominee who most reasonable would agree is eminently qualified for the position he is to fill.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://ThatColoredfellasweblog.bloghorn.com/ that colored fella

    For the moment Rob,

    I’ll take the bait, as those of you on the Right try desperately to whip up a distraction to the Rove/Plame scandal.

    Senate Dems’ demands for WH documents on Bolton did not torpedo his nomination, wavering Republicans did. Their similar demands for denied WH documents on William Pryor’s first confirmation did not stall his nomination, the lack of moderate Republicans to kill the filibuster did.

    These are not Roberts’ personal correspondences being sought (as Thompson suggests), they are his filings, motions and notes dealing solely with his stint as counsel to, for example, Bush Sr. in 81-82 – as the article clearly states!

    Whether you like it or not, there’s going to be a substantive and very public scrutiny of Roberts. Meaning, even if the White House does not fully comply, ranking Dems will see these documents.

    Which raises this question for you – given the context of the Rove scandal presently, what benefit is there for the Bush White House to do otherwise?

  • LoadTheMule

    The opposition can ask for anything they desire relative to Bolton and the WH can decide whether or not to pony up the documents. He’s not an attorney and the best the administration can argue is some sort of executive priviledge.

    Roberts is an attorney and as such was dealing with his client (Bush/Reagan/whoever). Asking for that work product is ridculous and the opposition knows it.

    Regards…

  • holier than thou

    …remember that you are saying these documents should be off limits for this individual…an official who will work to enable or impede our freedoms nonetheless…next time you think it’s okay for an authority to seize the documents of other individuals’ private relations with their church, doctor, etc…ala planned parenthood, patriot act games, etc….

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    I’ll take the bait, as those of you on the Right try desperately to whip up a distraction to the Rove/Plame scandal.

    Ah haha! You always think that Rob has ulterior motives. What an ass you are. It’s all you have.

  • LoadTheMule

    that colored fella,

    Point well taken. Sorry f I implied that everything Roberts did was work product. My only point is that, even as SG, some portion of it is and is therefore off-limits. How the WH chooses to deal with the rest is their business. Not that either side is going to parse the what is/what isn’t issue very objectively.

    And, by the way, my name isn’t ‘Load’. Feel free to call me LTM if you want a shorter title than LoadTheMule.

    Regards…

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Oh…and by the way “that colored fella” – there is no Rove/Plame scandal. It’s all in your head. The only desperate one here is you. Carry on with your usual mindlessness.

  • http://ThatColoredfellasweblog.bloghorn.com/ that colored fella

    Roberts is an attorney and as such was dealing with his client (Bush/Reagan/whoever). Asking for that work product is ridculous and the opposition knows it.

    If you read the article again Load, Roberts was Solicitor General, not the President’s attorney (also TCF’s mis-read). Furthermore, not everything falls under privilege.

    This looks awfully ‘obstructionist’!

  • Joshua

    How long before Teddy Kennedy demands to see every love letter John Roberts passed back in the third grade??

  • http://thepoliticalteen.net/2005/07/25/2013/ The Political Teen » Con

    &heellip; (via Say Anything) WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The Bush administration does not want to release confidential memos that U.S. Supreme Court nominee John Roberts wrote when he worked for two Republican presidents, a White House adviser said on Sunday. &heellip;

  • http://ThatColoredfellasweblog.bloghorn.com/ that colored fella

    My only point is that, even as SG, some portion of it is and is therefore off-limits. How the WH chooses to deal with the rest is their business.

    Respectfully LTM,

    Consider us in total agreement!

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development