Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, July 09, 2006

Burying the Lede

The reliably un-reliable New York Times (effectively the Al Qaeda Intelligence Service [AQIS]) has done us both a disservice and a service. The disservice was two fold: They published a leaked privileged communication between the chairman (Peter Hoekstra) of the House Intelligence Committee and they both selectively (and anti-contextually) quoted from it and buried the lede of the letter. The service they provided was the pdf of the actual letter.

Tom Maguire, at his Just One Minute blog does the reporting that Lichtblau and Shane of the AQIS failed to do. The real lede of the letter?

Hoekstra - CIA Group "Intentionally Undermined" Administration

July 9, 2006


The NY Times yesterday featured a Lichtblau-Shane story centered around a once-confidential letter to President Bush from Peter Hoekstra, Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Here is the Times lead, but stay with me, since they buried a great tidbit:

In a sharply worded letter to President Bush in May, an important Congressional ally charged that the administration might have violated the law by failing to inform Congress of some secret intelligence programs and risked losing Republican support on national security matters.

The letter from Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, the Republican chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, did not specify the intelligence activities that he believed had been hidden from Congress.

But Mr. Hoekstra, who was briefed on and supported the National Security Agency's domestic surveillance program and the Treasury Department's tracking of international banking transactions, clearly was referring to programs that have not been publicly revealed.


Yeah, yeah. But the Times also offers a .pdf of the letter itself, which includes this (my typing, and emphasis added) on the topic of Bush's decision to bring back Steve Kappes as Deputy Director of the CIA:

I understand that Mr. Kappes is a capable, well-qualified, and well-liked former Directorate of Operations (DO) case officer. I am heartened by the professional qualities he would bring to the job, but concerned by what could be the political problems that he could bring back to the agency. There has been much public and private speculation about the politicization of the Agency. I am convinced that this politicization was underway well before Porter Goss became the Director. In fact, I have long been convinced that a strong and well-positioned group within the Agency intentionally undermined the Administration and its policies. This argument is supported by the Ambassador Wilson/Valerie Plame events, as well as by the string of unauthorized disclosures from an organization that prides itself with being able to keep secrets. I have come to the belief that, despite his service to the DO, Mr. Kappes may have been a part of this group. I must take note when my Democratic colleagues - those who so vehemently denounced and now publicly attacked the strong choice of Porter Goss as Director - now publicly support Mr. Kappes’s return.


Is the Times kidding? The Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is "convinced" that a CIA faction is intent on discrediting the Administration and that the Plame story is part of their scheming, and the Times can barely mention it? (Or maybe I'm kidding - the WaPo does not mention it at all. Did I pick a bad morning to switch to decaf, or did they? More on the WaPo below.)


Read the whole thing.

So, yet another piece of evidence for the inevitable trial of the New York Times, it's reporters and editors has now been entered into the record.

And, did I mention, that this is a weekend of riches?

Hat Tip: Ed Morrisey

Comments

Avatar for WOOF

Hoekstra is threatening the administration with disclosure of its secret programs cause Kappes/General Hayden are not his guys.
The letter

Regrettably, the appointment of Mr. Kappes sends a clear signal that the days of collaborative reform between the White House and this committee may be over.


Tangled Web

WOOF on July 9, 2006 at 02:39 pm
Avatar for Rodney Graves

woof,

Did you read the whole letter?

I didn’t think so.

Out Here
Rodney Graves

Rodney Graves on July 9, 2006 at 03:57 pm
Avatar for WOOF

I read the letter .
You believe a faction of the CIA used duplicitous manuevering to discredit the administration?
The CIA caused the administration to out Plame?
That the NYT was part of this cabal?
That the NYT will inevitablly be tried for their part in this?
Some stretch.


hoekstra in his own words

WOOF on July 9, 2006 at 07:27 pm
Avatar for robert108

Woof: The administration didn’t “out” Plame.  The CIA leaked that info to the press, then tried to blame it on the administration, to build up Wilson’s creds over his scam article on yellowcake.

robert108 on July 9, 2006 at 07:30 pm
Avatar for Rodney Graves

WOOF,

I know a reporter in DC who covers National Security.  According to said reporter, one could not get Joe Wilson to sut up about his wife the CIA Agent on the cocktail circuit.

While the above is anecdotal, note that Fitzgerald has charged NO ONE (not even Robert Novak) with violation of the Identities Act, nor anyone else with actually revealing classified information.

Thus, in answer to your question:

The CIA caused the administration to out Plame?

No.  Plame was not operating under cover at the time of the Novak article, nor had she been within the last five years.  The CIA thus did not “cause the administration” to do so, though Wilson may indeed have been working in close contact with elements within the CIA (viz Mary McCarthy).

In answer to your question:

You believe a faction of the CIA used duplicitous manuevering to discredit the administration?

Yes, and so does the Chairman of the Senate Select Comittee on Intelligence.

that the NYT was part of this cabal?

Member of a cabal?  I don’t know.  Willing conduit and fellow traveler?  Without question.

That the NYT will inevitablly be tried for their part in this?

In the Plame matter?  No.  For violations of the Espionage Act (as ammended) and National Security Act?  Probably.  Their reporters and editors will certainly be called to testify before one or more grand juries in the matter?  The Plame Precedent assures us of that.

QED

Out Here
Rodney Graves

Rodney Graves on July 9, 2006 at 07:53 pm
Avatar for WOOF

I’ll let Fitzgerald to continue to stir the pot.

WOOF on July 9, 2006 at 08:08 pm
Avatar for robert108

Woof: He is in danger of falling into said pot.

robert108 on July 9, 2006 at 08:12 pm
Avatar for diane

I know a reporter in DC who covers National Security. According to said reporter, one could not get Joe Wilson to sut up about his wife the CIA Agent on the cocktail circuit.

Can your make-believe friend come and play with my make-believe friend, Roddy?  Batty’s make believe friends will all be there.

diane on July 9, 2006 at 11:24 pm
Avatar for diane

It’s a sad commentary that there is all this intrigue going on in the U.S. government right now.  I thought we elected these folks to run the country so we could do what we need to do to take care of our families.  Instead, here we are trying to figure out who did what to who this time around. 

My husband’s grandpa always said to my hub’s dad dad: “Son, politics is dirty business”.  Yes, he used incorrect grammar, he surely did, but he nailed it.

I’m so darn sick of dirty politics and listening to all the amateur detectives and unknown bloggers who sprung up like mushrooms after rain pontificate on this crap.

Basically, who cares about all this nonsense.
These reporters who will fade back into thankful obscurity within a few short years just keep churning it out. 

What in the heck happened to just being Americans who were respected and had respect for others. We have turned into a big, ugly Sherock Holmes soap opera of nutcases, spouting inane stories and meaningless drivel about anything and everything, divided into warring camps.

Darnnit....I’m fallen right into the middle of it.  Help, I’m drowning in a sea of political sewage.

Get on with it and run the country, you lame politicians.  It’s all on our nickel and we should all go kick some major politico butt for what they have all done to this country, both parties.

diane on July 9, 2006 at 11:34 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.

    

By submitting your comment you agree to our terms of service.