Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Monday, February 04, 2008

Bulletproof: Defense Contract With Tribal Business Puts Soldiers At Risk

July 21, 2006, there was a raid on the Sioux Manufacturing (SMC) plant in Ft. Totten, ND which is on the Ft. Totten Indian Reservation.  SMC is a company owned by the Spirit Lake Sioux Indian tribe and has had government contracts since it opened.  Specifically, since 1994 they have been manufacturing the Kevlar armor needed for our combat soldiers including those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

No reporters or journalists showed up to cover the event because when it comes to Indian country, the press just waits to be told whatever the government wants them to know.  The only information about the raid that was reported came from a press release issued by the government:

“The government’s investigation determined that from 1994 to 2006, the company sold finished aramid cloth—or Kevlar—to UNICOR Federal Prison Industries, which then used it to manufacture Personnel Armour System Ground Troops helmets. With each delivery of the Kevlar, Sioux Manufacturing certified its product met the required military specifications, one of which dictates a specific number of woven yarns per square inch of finished cloth. The investigation found evidence that, on occasion, the company knowingly delivered cloth that did not meet specifications.”

If you read the court documents that describe the Qui tam (whistleblower) filing, and you read the partial transcripts of the recorded conversations with SMC’s quality control person, you realize that these lapses in product quality were not “occasional” but rather an ongoing fraud upon the government and our soldiers whose lives and limbs depended on the product being made by SMC.

The government was quick to minimize the severity and longevity of the inferior products to make this ugly situation go away.

In the world of government contracts, politics is king.  Often retired military brass get lucrative jobs lobbying or procuring for the military.  Political cronyism runs rampant, even where lives are at stake, and the safety and security of our nation is at risk.  The dollar is God. 

Most interesting is this: The U.S. Attorney in ND, Drew Wrigley, said several federal agencies had concluded that the weaves were inadequate, but did not result in any harm to U.S. troops.  Yet according to inspection logs the Kevlar produced by SMC routinely fell short of standards.  Instead of 35x35 threads per inch (a standard required by military standards for Kevlar armor and helmets), some batches were in the low 20’s or less!

I would be interested to know who conducted any tests, and what the parameters of those tests were, that proved no one had been harmed by these inferior products.  The only way to prove it, and the military owes it to the soldiers and personnel who were put at risk to prove it, is to take the equipment worn by every soldier that was injured or killed and see a) If that equipment was indeed one of the hundreds of thousands of inferior products and b) whether or not it failed.

No other ‘test’ is really durable under the scrutiny of common sense and diligence. 

But the US Government is the kind of club where they get to investigate themselves, their friends and their partners and deliver, without question, a result that makes no sense.  It would seem that the only truly bullet proof part of this are the contractors and vendors and the lucrative millions that flow between them.  Sioux Manufacturing continues to produce products for the US military, including Kevlar body armor, to this day.

Comments

Avatar for John M.

Well, I don’t think they have to test every piece of gear that was worn by a deceased soldier.  They could probably just take samples of the noncompliant material and run THOSE through ballistics tests to see if they still functions properly.  There is probably a safety factor between the minimum threads per inch required for correct function, and the spec.

John M. on February 4, 2008 at 10:45 am

If this is proven SMC and those companies who knowingly used their material need to be paying the cost for care of wounded and crippled troops. And no, I don’t give a shit what their political affiliations are. No possible way it was 10 thread psi by accident. That was a conscious decision on the part of someone in charge.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on February 4, 2008 at 10:54 am
Rob
Rob
17408 comments
Send a private message

Well, I don’t think they have to test every piece of gear that was worn by a deceased soldier.  They could probably just take samples of the noncompliant material and run THOSE through ballistics tests to see if they still functions properly.  There is probably a safety factor between the minimum threads per inch required for correct function, and the spec.

Well even if the vests still measured up, I think SMC has proven that they can’t be trusted in this regard.  They knowingly sent these vests out even though they were below standard.

Just we can’t prove that any soldiers died from these sub-standard vests doesn’t mean that their lives weren’t in jeopardy.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 4, 2008 at 11:36 am

I’ve actually been in a lab (at West Point--I visited, but not as a cadet) where such materials were being tested.  Really cool place--it was in 1986, when probably these materials were getting their legs under them. 

Now can we tell how many people might have died as a result of this fiasco?  Maybe, maybe not.  I’m under the impression that the “soft” part of the vest stops pistol rounds and flak, but rifle rounds are only stopped if they’re first flattened out by the ceramic inserts. 

So you’re left with a distinctly small subset (thankfully) of deaths; those by pistol or rifle round (most are by IED)where fabric failed that otherwise might have held.

Still a good idea to cancel the contract with these guys, as woven materials are made today by machine.  You want to get 20x20 threads per inch, you set it there.  You want 35x35, you set it there.  Ain’t no way this happened by accident, and the scarier thing is it probably didn’t save them much money.  The big cost is capital and labor, not materials.

Bike Bubba on February 4, 2008 at 02:22 pm
Rob
Rob
17408 comments
Send a private message

I agree that determining troop deaths attributable to these substandard weaves would be difficult, but what I don’t understand is why this firm was allowed to keep its contract.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on February 4, 2008 at 02:34 pm

BTW, I would have to guess, from an engineering perspective, that penetration likelihood is exponentially reduced as thread count (same as in your sheets, yes!) is increased.  If tight weave is 40 threads per inch and they chose 20/inch, that leaves plenty of space for a 7.62mm round to penetrate; really about half the space.  On the other hand, 35/inch leaves very little room at all.  You have to break things to get through.

Fire ‘em.

Bike Bubba on February 4, 2008 at 02:40 pm

"Fire ‘em.”

No. Firing them allows them to take their anti-business, anti-human, anti-American politically driven shit elsewhere. That is unacceptable.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on February 4, 2008 at 06:17 pm

Make those lower-than-whaleshit vermin walk point for good troops, protected only by their negligently or intentionally defective products.


...for great justice

Move_Zig on February 4, 2008 at 06:23 pm

2H9, I would ordinarily agree with you, but reality is that most of these tribal enterprises aren’t getting business anywhere but from government and politically connected (government funded) businesses.  Most likely, a termination for cause from the government WOULD close this place and put the perpetrators out of work for a LONG time.

Bike Bubba on February 5, 2008 at 07:54 am

The problem is not the workers, it is the management level a$$holes who perpetrated this fraud who need punished, and all their personal assets liquidated to pay for the medical care and disability for their victims. Putting a bunch of people on a Rez out of work is the exact opposite of what needs done.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on February 5, 2008 at 03:05 pm

Unfortunately, “piercing the veil”, the legal doctrine for prosecuting officers of a corporation, is difficult at best. 

And is it just management?  Personally, I would suggest that the engineers and technicians who implemented the new weaving code are also guilty, though not as guilty, as management.

Putting rank & file out of work is horrendous, it’s true, but if real companies (those not funded with government cheese) found out that the basic rules of society apply on a res as well via the firing of some relative innocents, it could be the best long term thing for people there, ironically.

Bike Bubba on February 5, 2008 at 03:33 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.