Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, December 09, 2007

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown: The War Is Over

At least for the British troops it is anyway.

GORDON Brown yesterday delivered a stirring festive message to Our Boys in Iraq: “Happy Christmas – war is over.”

The PM was cheered as he praised UK troops and revealed combat operations in Basra will end “within two weeks”.

Iraqi forces will take over as the 4,500-strong British force switches from front-line duties to a training role.

By early next year, our contingent in Southern Iraq will be cut to 2,500 – and may be withdrawn completely in March.

The PM broke the good news in a flying visit to Iraq.

He landed at the Army’ s base at Basra airport in darkness in an RAF Hercules transporter plane.

Minutes later he spoke to Iraqi PM Nouri al-Maliki.

He then gave a rousing speech to 300 squaddies after shaking hands with them all.

Brown is an anti-Iraq war guy, and I wish he wasn’t being so flippant about withdrawing British troops, but on the other hand there’s a lot here to be happy about too:

To warm applause, he told them the region – the last under British control in Iraq – would be handed back to the Iraqis in a fortnight.

He said: “The Prime Minister of Iraq has asked me to pass on his thanks to you for helping to rebuild the democracy of Iraq.

“This is because of the operations over the last month that you have been involved in.

“The security situation has not only improved, but he is able to tell me he will now be recommending a move to a provisional Iraqi control within two weeks.

“Iraqis can take far more control of their country.”

That last statement is true, and it’s an indication of the level of success we’ve had in Iraq.

I think the departure of the British troops should be seen as them having accomplished their mission, not abandoning it.  Though the latter is obviously how it will be spun by certain partisan interests and their mouthpieces in the media.

Comments

Avatar for gonzo

Brown is desperate for positive news to feed his fed up Brits. This is why he is doing this.

gonzo on December 9, 2007 at 10:03 pm
Avatar for Bill Mitchell

In a long list of reasons why we can’t let a Democrat take office, this one is important.

I’ll be damned if George Bush took all the risks and used up all the political capital to win this war in Iraq, only to have Hillary come in after the war is won by Bush and declare she is “bringin’ the troops home”.

Yep, she is the savior, she is the one who cares about our troops.  THAT would make me physically ill.  It’s time for them to come home anyway because we have won due to Bush’s brave policies, yet she gets to be the peace-maker.

In England, Tony Blair made all the tough choices, now this new guy gets the credit for the victory.  Sick.

Bill Mitchell on December 10, 2007 at 04:21 am

No, Brown will not get the credit. The Tommy pullout from Basra has been underway for several months, exactly according to the sched set forth by British High Command. As for Hillary, she will not withdraw from anywhere, troops will still be in Iraq, just like they are still in Korea, and Germany, and Japan.

The current wave of murdered civilians and police in Iraq is solidifying the populace AGAINST Al Queda and the hardline religious assholes. They know who is killing them. And they know who is helping them, Blackwater stupidity aside.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on December 10, 2007 at 04:42 am

I think Hillary/Obama will try and take the credit for the eventual complete success of the war. They know that we’re still in Germany, Japan ect… But they refuse to agree that the same types of guerrilla/urban/insurgent warfare was overcome eventually and became a liberation for the masses of those countries. This is what I think they will argue if elected in order to keep troops in Iraq. Hillary has already hinted about it.

Of course she left open the possibility that if it get’s too difficult, she would no longer protect ordinary citizens from ethnic cleansing…

WOW! Is that the kind of leader that’s going to be one of two choices in America?! Shhheeeeessshhh

In a half-hour interview on Tuesday in her Senate office, Mrs. Clinton said the scaled-down American military force that she would maintain would stay off the streets in Baghdad and would no longer try to protect Iraqis from sectarian violence — even if it descended into ethnic cleansing.

jakethedog on December 10, 2007 at 07:13 am

jake, her hubby refused to take any action to stop the Rwandan Genocide, so this is no surprise. Although I don’t think she has the balls to actually brazen out the hue&cry of the international community. Bill just tuned it out, the same as he tuned her out.

The only reason he entered the Balkans under the pretense of “stopping Genocide” was because Vernon Jordan pointed out the substantial business opportunities for their BCCI paisanos. Follow the money, that is the compass to all Clinton issues.


Una Salus Victus Nullam Sperare Salutem

2Hotel9 on December 11, 2007 at 06:12 am

so true

jakethedog on December 12, 2007 at 10:20 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.