Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Bolton Still Mixing It Up At The UN

I am so glad we appointed this man.

U.S. Tries to Exclude Some From U.N. Group

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is trying to exclude seven nations from a new U.N. human rights council, saying their own records make them unfit to sit in judgment of others.

In a reform proposal, Sudan, Liberia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ivory Coast, Somalia, Sierra Leone and Rwanda would not be eligible to serve on a revised human rights council.

The seven countries are subject to sanctions by the U.N. Security Council for human rights abuses and the United States wants to keep "some of the worst offenders off," Kristen Silverberg, assistant secretary of state for International Organizations said Wednesday.

Forming a new human rights council to replace the "discredited" Human Rights Commission is an important part of the U.S. agenda for reform of the United Nations, she said.


And John Bolton is leading the charge. You remember him. He's the guy Bush had to appoint when Congress went into recess because Democrats didn't think he was fit for the job.

The vague headline sort of puts a negative spin on this, but the reality is that keeping human rights violators off the world body's human rights commission just makes sense. After all, a shelter for battered women wouldn't hire a man convicted of beating his wife, would they?

Comments

Avatar for MikeAdamson

WARNING: Mild equivocation in this post.

I actually agree with the idea of keeping human rights abusers off of a human rights commission. The question of where to draw the line exists but that shouldn’t be an insurmountable problem. I still don’t like Bolton though...I predict he will cause many more problems than he will solve.

MikeAdamson on August 31, 2005 at 01:09 pm
Avatar for bullwinkle

If standing up for what’s right is going to cause us problems with the groups responsible for what’s wrong then Bolton is on the right track. I want the whole world to decide if the job of the UN is appeasement or their stated goal of making the world a better place. If there’s a better place to start than the human rights council I don’t know where it would be. Appeasing the guilty rather than forcing them to reform has always failed and always will.

bullwinkle on August 31, 2005 at 01:09 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.