Blogs Written By Fools For Imbeciles?
The Wall Street Journal has a column up by someone named Joseph Rago about blogging.
The subtitle of the column is “Written by fools to be read by imbeciles.” Which tells you pretty much all you need to know about Mr. Rago’s opinions of blogging.
I have two responses to Mr. Rago:
First, bloggers are the same “fools” and “imbeciles” who are the readers/viewers of mainstream journalism. It’s not very nice to call your customers names.
Second, most blogging isn’t intended to be journalism. Some blogging is journalism (like that which is done by these folks going to Iraq), but most is simply commentary from concerned citizens. Traditional letters to the editor, basically, except in a whole new format and much more complex.
I don’t know of a single blogger who honestly believes that the amateur blogosphere is going to replace professional journalism. Do we bloggers take our opinions and conclusions seriously? Absolutely. What citizen doesn’t? But we certainly aren’t thinking we’re going to replace full-time journalists.
Mr. Rago can rant and rave all he wants about how amateurish most blog postings are, but the truth of the matter is that most bloggers have never claimed to be anything but casual, amateur commentators.














