Bill Slipped Into “Stimulus” Package Allows Federal Government To Monitor Your Medical Care

To make sure your doctor is treating you in a cost-efficient manner.

The bill’s health rules will affect “every individual in the United States” (445, 454, 479). Your medical treatments will be tracked electronically by a federal system. Having electronic medical records at your fingertips, easily transferred to a hospital, is beneficial. It will help avoid duplicate tests and errors.
But the bill goes further. One new bureaucracy, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, will monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. The goal is to reduce costs and “guide” your doctor’s decisions (442, 446). These provisions in the stimulus bill are virtually identical to what Daschle prescribed in his 2008 book, “Critical: What We Can Do About the Health-Care Crisis.” According to Daschle, doctors have to give up autonomy and “learn to operate less like solo practitioners.”

This baloney should go the way Daschle’s nomination did: Right down the crapper.
Outside of familial relationships, an individual’s relationship with his/her doctor is perhaps one of the most intimate and private relationships he or she has. Already that relationship is made difficult by the fact that most of us have third-party health care payers (insurance companies, etc.) who want a say in how we’re treated. But now we’re going to complicate things further by getting the federal government involved too?
Why does the government get a say in how I’m treated? With insurance companies I get it. By signing up for insurance we open the door to insurance companies having a say in how we’re treated. It’s not a great situation, but that’s what has evolved. But what business is it of the government’s how I’m treated? Does anyone really think that the federal government – home of out of control spending and budget deficits – is going to bring efficiency to the health care industry?
And what of privacy? Not only are we talking about every single one of our medical records being put in a federal computer system (what’s the worst that could happen), we’re also talking about federal bureaucrats being able to review our medical records. For our own good.
This sort of unbelievably arrogant power grab is exactly the reason why Democrats are in such a hurry to fear-monger this way through Congress with a minimum of debate and scrutiny. Because Americans don’t want this nonsense, and they know it.

Tags: , ,


«
»
  • dfwpike

    I heard about this while listening to Rush today. All the Obama voters must be happy.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808

    All this will do is drive more Americans away from government-related anything in medicine, and strengthen the underground medical economy. Socializing medicine will be resisted through non-cooperation and the only way they can force our compliance IS force. When they escalate to get their way, and they always do sooner or later these little arrogant egomaniac fascists, the people will kick them to the curb… for a bit until the next dalliance when they forget again what happened the last time.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Wow, and all of the creeps that were worried about the Bush administration listening in on terrorists' cell calls are silent.

  • http://verizonwireless.com/ ND in MD

    Outside of familial relationships, an individual's relationship with his/her doctor is perhaps one of the most intimate and private relationships he or she has.

    I thought, at least what the pro-abortion lobby says, is that medicl procedures are between a women (a person) and her (their) Doctor. The government has no right to know. Is this still the case?

  • http://www.willisms.com/ Zsa Zsa

    Why is this a good thing and Listening in on Terrorists is a bad thing? I don't get it.

  • groetzinger

    Are all the GOP as paranoid as you seem to be?

  • mnconservative

    This goes even further than privacy, which is huge! This is going to rationed health care, God help our parents, or anyone with a chronic condition (people with Aids), or special needs, or anyone else the Messiah and his group of fascists decide doesn't belong on this earth. I hope all you morons that voted for this bunch of egomaniacs is happy. Did you all got the hope and change you were looking for? To you 3 rinos that voted with the Marxists, I and many like me are going to do everything we can to throw you out of the party and to make sure you don't get re-elected.

  • sayanything-2483

    Are all the GOP as paranoid as you seem to be?
    groetzinger on February 9, 2009 at 05:10 pm

    The answer to your question is the same as the answer to this question. Are all DEMS socialists and communists?

  • tom

    How will abortion mills handle this? Course if women realize their records will be public maybe they won't abort.

  • mnconservative

    It's not paranoia, it's realism.

  • dragon poker

    Paranoid is the right way to be when everyone is out to get you.
    This is real. This will put more power over your life in the hands of the bureaucracy.
    This is inevitable. It will not be stopped short of total collapse of the system, and that is unlikely.
    Reality bites, especially when it sucks and there is nothing you can do about it.
    Ya'll better learn to adapt. Quickly.

  • Rezistik

    Eek.

    Me no likey.

    Just like I didn't like the government spying on "terrorists" I am wholeheartedly against this. Excuse my ignorance on how this all gets passed, but was this slipped on earmark/pork barrel style or was it a bunch of bills labeled stimulus that just got pushed out quickly?

  • SHADY

    It's with the PORK BILL!!!

  • checkers

    you obviously "don't" get it. The government will soon BE your insurance carrier. Thus they get to say how much $$ your life is worth.

  • Teddy Roosevelt

    Beware the O man's plans. Tyranny lurks.

  • George Orwell

    It's coming. Don't say I didn't tell you.

  • Hannitized

    Why is this a good thing and Listening in on Terrorists is a bad thing? I don't get it.

    That sounds about right.

  • sinned

    >>>>Are all the GOP as paranoid as you seem to be?

    Just as paranoid as those who believe the Patriot Act means the government will be listening
    in on my calls to Aunt Mabel, or worrying that my library records might be obtained and used
    solely as a reason to kick in the front door of my home to search it.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    So that's the argument? Just call it "paranoid" if you don't want the big and inefficient federal government to monitor and handle your health care.

    That's not very convincing.

    Where are the rest of the left who complained about the overseas wiretaps? Why are they so silent?

  • http://Array Hannitized

    The Federal Government knows how much you make every year. They know how many kids you have. They know where you live. They know if you have a legal job or not. They know your address.

    I don't care if they know if I have cancer or not. I do care if my doctor is taking advantage of me as much as I hate my auto mechanic is taking advantage of my adequate insurance coverage.

    I do care if they monitor my phone calls or spy on my actions. I consider the two completely separate.

    I think the mock outrage is quite transparent.

    Ensuring there are digital medical records is going to be a big boon to the economy. There are going to have to be billions of dollars spent on storage and software to manage it.

    There will be HIPAA regulations that need to be followed. This will provide more jobs and work for people who specialize in consulting on regulation requirements.

    This will provide more jobs.

  • Bat One

    There will be HIPAA regulations that need to be followed. This will provide more jobs and work for people who specialize in consulting on regulation requirements.

    This will provide more jobs.

    H,

    How many autoworkers, retail sales clerks, bankers, or long haul truckers do you figure that will put back to work?

    Our economy doesn't need more government make work jobs, such as interpreting federal regulations which are obviously too complex and cumbersome in the first place or they wouldn't need to be interpreted. What we need are more private sector jobs, putting those who have lost their jobs back to work. There's no evidence the Obama stimulus and recovery plan will do this.

  • Hannitized

    Bat,

    How many autoworkers, retail sales clerks, bankers, or long haul truckers do you figure that will put back to work?

    Well…I don't think that particular piece of the stimulus was aimed at them. I think that particular piece is aimed at High Tech.

    Armonk (NY) – The Associated Press (AP) is reporting that some estimates for IBM's lay offs since last week are above 4,000. Alliance@IBM for example, a union group reportedly representing a small number of IBM workers, places the estimate above 4,000.

    SOURCE

    Our economy doesn't need more government make work jobs, such as interpreting federal regulations which are obviously too complex and cumbersome in the first place or they wouldn't need to be interpreted.

    Maybe we don't, but I never said that it would create more jobs of for government workers to interpret federal regulations. It will keep the current ones busy, making money and hopefully spending it.

    I know of a lot of people who will be struggling this year and possibly next. This could really give them a shot in the arm. I think that is the intention.

    What we need are more private sector jobs, putting those who have lost their jobs back to work. There's no evidence the Obama stimulus and recovery plan will do this.

    It will create those, and hopefully put some of those ex-IBM people back to work.

    The government jobs that will be created will be required to do the verification and to help set the program in place and manage it. I can live with that.

  • Bat One

    H,

    Not surprisingly, you are far more sanguine about this program's chances for success than I am. Nothing Obama said last night, and nothing T-Man Geithner said this morning would lead one to conclude that either of them knows what he's talking about, or that anything that has been proposed by the Obama administration will put those who have lost their jobs back to work.

    I emphasize "back" to work, because it is that… not the creation of new jobs… that would be most helpful to those who've been laid off.

  • Bat One

    Incidentally, speaking of Geithner, the market, which was down only 10 points before T-Man took to the podium, is down 300 now. Mush like his master, he spent half an hour lecturing everyone and said virtually nothing beyond, "We're working on it."

  • Hannitized

    Nothing Obama said last night, and nothing T-Man Geithner said this morning would lead one to conclude that either of them knows what he's talking about, or that anything that has been proposed by the Obama administration will put those who have lost their jobs back to work.

    What about the 4000 IBMers who lost their job? This could easily put many of them back to work.

  • Hannitized

    Bat,

    Not surprisingly, you are far more sanguine about this program's chances for success than I am.

    It's not so much that as I am defending this particular attack on Obama's plan, by Rob.

    I think Rob is short-sighted and ill-informed on the benefits of this particular piece of the stimulus plan.

  • Lydia Plunk

    The physician's ability to treat the patient should not be interfered with by the government. Medicine is not just a science- it is an art. Doctor's clients are not textbooks or machines- they are people with variables which cannot be reduced to irreducables. People are just not the same. Think dealing with an insurance company is difficult now. Just wait until you need to be treated for something which calls for measures to be taken outside the belljar curve norm.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    Hannitized – The Federal Government knows how much you make every year. They know how many kids you have. They know where you live. They know if you have a legal job or not. They know your address.

    All thanks to people like you.

    You know…for how much you go on about how much you don't trust the government (during the last administration), you sure are comfortable with them knowing more and more about you. There's a disconnect there somewhere.

    Ensuring there are digital medical records is going to be a big boon to the economy. There are going to have to be billions of dollars spent on storage and software to manage it.

    There will be HIPAA regulations that need to be followed. This will provide more jobs and work for people who specialize in consulting on regulation requirements.

    This will provide more jobs.

    Call it a hunch, but you'll ignore that part of your argument the next time you go on about how much more efficient the government model is.

    I have to say though, your new argumentative tone is much better than your last one. Kudos to that.

  • http://suitepotato.blogspot.com/ sayanything-4808
    Why is this a good thing and Listening in on Terrorists is a bad thing? I don't get it.

    That sounds about right.

    I don't think you get it either Hannah. Listen to yourself:

    I don't care if they know if I have cancer or not. I do care if my doctor is taking advantage of me as much as I hate my auto mechanic is taking advantage of my adequate insurance coverage.

    Whether you want them to know you have cancer is entirely up to you. Whether or not you care is entirely up to you. Whether or not they know if I have a cold, or cancer, or the measles is up to ME. NOT YOU. NOT OBAMA. The idea of doctor-patient confidentiality is not something you, Obama, or anyone else has a divine right to undo by fiat.

    I do care if they monitor my phone calls or spy on my actions. I consider the two completely separate.

    You are not, as far as I know, a terrorist. Good for you. Keep your privacy. I would expect no less. But as I said, it is entirely up to you. Do not expect the privacy of others to be other than their own to decide upon.

    They say that familiarity breeds contempt, but the foolish and self-serving actions of cynical men will do better I think to that end.

    The deeper down the rabbit hole you go with this selective application of ends justifying the means, the more disrespect you breed for the entire enterprise of society and governance and sooner or later, the body politic will against itself be divided and come to ruin. Rest assured, that those who served the bringing about of that day will be richly rewarded as are all who betray their best interests for the coin of other realms, by the masters of those realms.

    Thus, I'd not be so quick to forget that the dictum of the medical practitioner, first do no harm, applies to one and all for more reasons than the safety of others but by the natural workings of the ways of men it would save your own neck from the wrath of men put to ruin by that which you so cavalierly advocate in defiance of your own conscience.

    We should not trifle with the future for it has a very terrible way of not staying there.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development