You go, girl!

That way when we meet conservatives in real-life we have our arguments fine-tuned.

Based on what I see on here I doubt very much this is working out for you.

You lying POS. You deliberately made up multiple ID’s to self-aggrandize and try to make yourself feel relevant, which you are not. You are a nekulturny worm.

ellinas, herpitized bragged up a lib blog called “washington monthly”, so I checked it out.

It was absurd and gay as hell. One post I remember was by a person called ennui boye. His post was about how he hated Bush and Cheney. All the posts were about Bush and Cheney. Didn’t they get the news? Bush and Cheney have been gone for over a year. There was no discussion of any subtance, which might explain why you libs are over here on SAB.

Here is what was a typical post by ennui boye, “Oh that Dick Cheney. Oh, he is such a bad man. Bad, bad, bad, baaaaaaaaaaaa bad, baaaaaaaa baaaaaaaaaa bad. But I sure like his name, Te Hee!”

Why would any of us want to waste our time with vacuous fags on a lib blog?

They probably don’t see anything wrong with “liking” your own posts.

So I was just putting salt on the wound when I insulted back.” — Hannitized

This is classic funny shyt right here. Veg, you buying this crap says a lot about what a drip you are.

The only wounds herpitized ever gives are the stitches in our sides from laughing so much at his idiocy. This is just more herpitized spin, trying to deny that he fraudulently made up other ID’s to go around “liking” himself so he could try to convince himself he has some sort of pathetic relevance.

herpitized you are a lying POS uncultured worm that can reach a computer keyboard and lie and self aggrandize and that’s all you ever will be.

You have no idea what the word credibility means troll. It’s comical for a troll who runs around switching ID’s to click on “likes” for himself to use the word credibility. You are a less than zero buffoon who constantly lies and gets caught at it. You don’t have any credibility and never will have.

Now, go switch ID’s and give yourself a like so you can pretend you are somebody.

LOL!!! This is comical to the extreme.

R180, MZ and WHFF are the three that I worry about most. Its’ their safety and the people around them I fear for. They seem dangerously unstable.

This is rich coming from a berserker who lies about his income, boasts about material things, posts about himself having sex with diseased whores and makes up fraudulent ID’s so he can go back and “like” his own posts.

It’s been well established by you, based on evidence that you provided about yourself, that you are a certifiable nutcase.

herpitized, there is a 100% consensus on SAB that you are a pathological liar that is lower than a common worm.

…someone would be in jail? All the teapartiers,bloggers and media types that brought sunshine to the antics of Dorgan,Pomeroy and Conrad may be on the list of a partisan US Attroney.

Jvette: I refer to it as the “vast, empty canyons inside his head”. You may quote me! Heh.

Hey, herpitized, you develop any new ID’s to give yourself some “likes” today? You toady little fraud.

Actually, the appointment as US Attorney was the Dems’ second option. Purdon’s first choice was to spend a night in the Lincoln bedroom, but Billy and Bernadette were visiting that weekend, so they offered Purdon the Justice Department appointment instead.

Animal mutilator,

There were a few likes on my post recently. Specifically the post where I said you, 2H9 and MZ were dangers to yourself and others, and that you two are damn near suicidal.’

Wonder why people agree with that. /sarcasm

Good. I won’t hold my breath.

Once could have been an accident. Hell, I even saw where zig “liked” one of herpitized posts, which was definitely an accident. I’ve come close to hitting the like key myself when I go to reply. The keys could be further apart, it would be better.

But herpitized “liked” his own posts hundreds of times. What a fraudulent POS. You have to be really stupid to do that. It was fraud by design, done by an imbecile.

Please post the URL of the site.

He got it here….

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_02/022251.php

Jvette

Bravo! That was extraordinarily well-said. The antithesis of one of his tantrums of invective.

One assumes that it simply wouldn’t occur to you to visit one of those “progressive” sites you mentioned and spew reckless insults at everyone, starting with your host. After all, that sort of puerile behavior is reason enough NOT to visit them in the first place.

Learn to quit living a Walter Mitty cyber life and admit you are blog rat without friends nor money. Then we will know you are at long last being honest with US.

The subect line of this thread is without a doubt a true statement. You can’t say with an once of credibilty that it’s not.

I am so incompetent I just make money by accident right?

We have no conclusive evidence that you are really in IT or make any money at it. We have ample evidence of your incompetence at this site. Go bore someone else now!

de nada

This guy has given $12,400 to the democratic party. I think he has paid enough for this job, don’t you think so??

ellinas,

Taking note of a person’s mental and emotional dysfunction is not the same thing as casting aspersions on their character… although lying, self-promotion, and persistently insulting all those with whom you disagree could probably be considered character deficiencies.

The ground rat is some female blog rat who is forever hating life. Put her on the “don’t waste time with” list….. she wants attention and the less given, the more insane she gets. Which makes for a funny show.

Answer: “Thank you for admitting…”

Question: What do trolls say just before they generally mischaracterize or distort anything you’ve said?

Anorexic Vegetarian gets his facts wrong again! Big surprise there! You won’t find what’s not there, moron. Especially not three times in one thread like the narcissist Wankertized. I did “like” my post on one occasion, just to see if I could. I was surprised that it was possible. But, it was never habitual with me like it was with Wee Willie Wankertized! Sorry! No cigar!

One time, too, after warning Hanni, Hanniq, Hannitized, etc. about not signing into his account, I wanted to see what would it would look like if I signed in as “Hanni”. Turns out Hanni the Tranni was impersonating or channeling a middle aged woman.

In my never ending battle against spam and sockpuppets, I do sometimes test security here. If I know what is possible, I know how to better prevent it. If you really want to hear the long boring story of how I came to have two accounts, I’ll tell you. I sometimes have one account open in one browser and the other in another. It helps me to moderate spam in both the forums and the comments.

But, blather on about your non issues, if it helps you sleep at night.

So your lib poopstain buddies are discussing a strategy to cheat. No surprise there. You all cheat, all the time, like you did by “liking” your own posts under a fraud ID, you fraud POS.

BTW, notice we noticed that you haven’t got one “like” since your stupid azz got caught.

You are as stupid as a bag of nails, herpitized.

You choose by being here to suffer the consequences of your own actions. I am not responsible for the words or posts of others.

I choose not to visit those sites as I know that I will heartily disagree and if I then post that disagreement, I will be subject to that venom and hatred.

Please do not whine to me that somewhere here is mean to you.

If you don’t like it, leave. See? Problem solved.

No doubt you gave yourself those likes, imbecile, or idiots as nuts as you. You have zero credibility. You are the crazy idiot who keeps coming back to a blog you say is crappy.

It’s you who is close to doing yourself, dude. You have to have a really shitty self esteem to resort to “liking” your own posts. That’s so pathetic.

And then after getting caught and exposed you don’t even feel any shame. That’s pathological right there. Proof that you are mental.

When right win nuts can’t construct any sort of argument, they resort to personal attack, mostly by projecting their mental illness on those who disagree with them. They also put words in the mouths of their opponents.
Pretty lame.

I’m not exactly going to check all Proof’s self-liking. Life is too short. But why would Proof change user account and then go to reply to himself, but accidentally hit the wrong button, and not reply either?

“I even saw where zig “liked” one of herpitized posts” — Mr Food

Maybe I’m less partisan than Zig but I’ve “like”d posts from conservatives and liberals. Just yesterday I liked a post by Neiman, maybe I’m going mad! And I’ve clicked “like” for Rob, Whistler, and others too.

You still have not renounced what J. Aviv, the Israeli agent as robert180 calls him, has said and you posted.
This man has said, per your post, that the Bush administration was warned a month prior to the events of 9/11 yet the Bushies ignored his warnings.
I wonder how long it will take you to retract your vile accusations.

He’s a money man for the party, and this appointment is less about his being qualified to hold this position than it’s about rewarding him for his political activities.

Explain that if you can. What did he actually do that makes him a hack, outside of being a Democrat.

If anyone is a hack, it’s you, for making statements you cant back up logically or with evidence or facts.

That is all this site is. Bullsh@t.

Again Mr Food, Proof went and “like”d his own posts. Where’s the hatred towards Poofie?

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/torture_in_venezuela/#comment-32157775

P.S. Click the link to see proof of Proof “like”ing himself.

Right wing-nut doesn’t like being called out on their crap. Shocker!

Thank you Jvette for admitting that this post was nothing more than a partisan hack, cheap shot at Obama, with no intelligent commentary.

You should have just agreed with me, you would have gained more credibility.

Love ya too rodent breath.

Blah, blah, blah.

What specifically did you learn from the comments of Rob Port, on this post?

Freakitized I have read your drivel off and on for most of a year now, and still have no idea why you are here, or why you would spew the insane crap you do! It has to be a illness.

On a similar topic, liberals show how more intellectually superior they are to right-wing hack sites, like SAB.

BRING ON THE RECESS APPOINTMENTS…. During the Bush/Cheney era, the White House would routinely nominate unqualified political hacks to key government posts, prompting Senate Democrats to block some of the worst of the bunch. The White House, in turn, would routinely circumvent Congress and fill the vacancies anyway, through “recess appointments.”

A president has the authority to appoint officials — on a temporary basis — to fill government vacancies when Congress is not in session. Bush took this power to new heights (or depths, as the case may be) to the great consternation of Democrats.

President Obama hasn’t had to bother with recess appointments, probably because his party has a huge majority in the Senate. But in about two hours, the Republican caucus will go from 40 members to 41, and the Senate’s ability to confirm nominees will come to an abrupt halt.

Which makes the prospect of recess appointments increasingly likely.

Democrats are mulling the use of recess appointments to overcome the Senate GOP’s newfound ability to block Obama administration appointments to judicial and regulatory posts.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid , D-Nev., said Thursday he may be forced to support the hardball tactic unless some of the chamber’s Republicans consent and let nominees through. Once Republican Scott P. Brown of Massachusetts is sworn in at 5 p.m. Thursday, the minority will have 41 votes — enough to sustain a filibuster.

“What alternative do we have? What alternative do we have?” Reid asked.

The key downside of these appointments — irrespective of political comity — is that those installed by the president can only serve a year or two (it depends on the post) without congressional confirmation.

But if Senate Republicans are simply unwilling to let the chamber vote on the administration’s nominees, the White House has a straightforward choice: allow posts to remain vacant indefinitely in the face of unprecedented obstructionism or start embracing recess appointments.

In the interest of fairness and intellectual consistency, I should note that I’m not a big fan of this tactic.

Article II, Sec. 2, of the Constitution says, “The President shall have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.” Note that it says, “the recess,” not “a recess.”

In the early days of the country, framers saw recesses that could last months and wanted presidents to be able to fill key positions temporarily in emergency situations without the Senate’s “advice and consent.” There’s a lengthy break following the final adjournment for the legislative session. This is “the recess.” The provision was not about giving presidents the authority to circumvent Congress when the White House felt like it.

In the modern understanding, though, any recess is an opportunity for a president to start filling vacancies with appointed officials. If lawmakers head out of town for a President’s Day Recess, as they will in a couple of weeks, Obama can conceivably start making these appointments to his heart’s content.

If I had to guess, I’d say the president isn’t crazy about this option, either, which is why he hasn’t taken advantage of it to date. He was a constitutional law professor; he knows the recess appointment option isn’t supposed to be used this way.

But Senate Republicans are simply out of control, and are deliberately undercutting the political process in ways that threaten to permanently undermine the institution. If they oppose the president’s nominees for various posts, they’re welcome to vote against them. But the GOP has decided to simply not allow votes, and there’s no reason for the White House to tolerate this.

If we’re being honest about this, do I think using the recess power for routine, non-emergencies constitutes abuse of the option? Yes, it probably is. But the far more offensive abuse is Senate Republicans not letting the chamber vote on these nominees in the first place.

Love is in the air………

Ok, Mr. b1tch.

Well said Jvette and right on the mark.

It seems that the only “echo chamber” here is located squarely between the ears of our pet trolls at SAB.

My goodness you guys are crybabies.

If I did that, who would call you guys out on your BS?

Oh, I get it now. Your own voice sounds so much better in an echo chamber,

I simply pointed out that Rob posted an article without any intelligent commentary or analysis. None, zippo, zilch.

I then pointed out that he only offered a cheap shot.

Jvette proved she did not learn anything from this post, which validated my criticism.

Watch and learn b1tch!!

Yawn.

That would imply you were…..well, never mind, you just don’t get it.

Haha.

Ahaha! PROOF, created another account and “liked” his own post, and attacks others for doing it. What a hypocrite. So much for his credibility, right?

Jvette in reply to hannitized:

I know that Daily Kos, Huffington Post and Moveon.org are all places where venom and hatred are the daily fare so I DON”T VISIT them.

Like this, right Jvette?
You must love this stuff:

2hotel9 3 days ago

So, I missed out on e spewing her Jew hate, yet again. Too funny. e? Where is all your proof that W had intimate, detailed knowledge of Al Queda’s operational plan and refused to stop it? Got any, whiny lying c*nt?
Of, and where is all your proof that Christians are using terrorism to force people to convert to Christianity, whiny lying c%nt? All you have to do is prove you did not say it, easily done. Why can you not do that?

Or like so:

Oh, e? Where is all your proof that Christians are using terrorism to force people to convert to Christianity, whiny lying c%nt? All you have to do is prove you did not say it, easily done. Why will you not do that?

Or like this:

2hotel9 2 days ago

So, you have no proof of your lies, yet again. You are simply a whiny lying c*nt.
Where is all your proof that Christians are using terrorism to force people to convert to Christianity, whiny lying c%nt? All you have to do is prove you did not say it, easily done. Why will you not do that?

2hotel9 3 days ago

And your proof of this bullsh*t is to link to your own post? What a stupid, whiny lying c*nt.

2hotel9 2 days ago

So, you have no proof of your lies, yet again. You are simply a whiny lying c*nt.

2hotel9 2 days ago

Oh, and you linked to your own post. You are not just a whiny lying c*nt, you are stupid on top of it.

“Now, go switch ID’s and give yourself a like so you can pretend you are somebody.” — Mr Food

Was this directed at Proof?
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/torture_in_venezuela/#comment-32157775

You have a short memory…..when convenient for you.
By the way, how is your dear mother?

Please do not hold your breath.

That would be Mr. b1tch to you kid.

carolport in reply to hannitized:

Idiot.

…When you cast aspersions on the other person’s character, that is an attack that has nothing to do with their reasoning; it just expresses anger toward someone who disagrees with you. That is not an effective argument.

robert108 on September 27, 2006 at 02:30 am

Blah, blah, blah. You have indicated that you learned nothing from Rob’s comments on this post.

Point; Hannitized.

Old grump.