Beware Of Romneycare

I told you Mitt Romney’s health care scheme in Mass. was going to be trouble. Here’s Betsy McCaughey in the Wall Street Journal laying out the reasons why:

Everyone should have access to health care. Massachusetts aims to achieve this goal with a double mandate: All residents must have health coverage (Section 12) and all employers with more than 10 workers must assume ultimate financial responsibility if employees or their immediate family members need expensive medical care and can’t pay for it (Sections 32, 44).
What is the impact on individuals? The state will offer subsidies to help low income residents pay for coverage (Section 19), but most of the uninsured earn too much to be eligible. An individual making $29,000 or more would probably have to pay the full cost or find a job that provides health insurance. Individual coverage costs about $3,600 in Massachusetts — a hefty bill. Moreover, under the new law, individuals purchasing their own insurance must buy HMO policies. Preferred provider plans (PPOs) — which give you more ability to choose your own doctors and treatments — are not allowed (Section 65).
The impact of this law on employers is substantial. The original bill required employers with more than 10 full-time workers to provide all of them (and their families) with health insurance or to opt out of that requirement by paying a $295 annual tax per worker into a state fund. This modest penalty was highly publicized by the bill’s supporters as proof that the bill would not be a heavy burden on businesses. Nevertheless, Gov. Romney vetoed it, perhaps to display his Republican credentials as a tax-cutter.
The Massachusetts House of Representatives overrode the veto — but the reality is that the $295 penalty is small potatoes compared with the other obligations in the law. Say, for example, you open a restaurant and don’t provide health coverage. If the chef’s spouse or child is rushed to the hospital and can’t pay because they don’t have insurance, you — the employer — are responsible for up to 100% of the cost of that medical care. There is no cap on your obligation. Once the costs reach $50,000, the state will start billing you and fine you $5,000 a week for every week you are late in filling out the paperwork on your uncovered employees (Section 44). These provisions are onerous enough to motivate the owners of small businesses to limit their full-time workforce to 10 people, or even to lay employees off.

This part made me gag.

What else is surprising about this new law? Union shops are exempt (Section 32).

Yup. Gotta pander to those union lobbyists.
As I’ve said before, this health care scheme does absolutely nothing to alleviate the true problem with health care, which is the high cost of health care. In fact, it goes a long way toward perpetuating the problem by forcing individuals and businesses in Mass. to lock into the system of insurance that caused the sky-high health care prices in the first place.

Tags: , , ,


«
»
  • http://Array Hayek

    MA will be the first state to have a healthcare system like the NHS in Britain. That being said, watch the MA economy hemorrhage jobs and population as businesses decide to find greener pastures. This law is going to be a disaster. Hopefully it will serve as an example for all these fools that think socialized nationalized health care is a good thing

  • Joseph Hawkins

    I, like many Americans, am concerned that “basic” health care is out of reach for to many Americans. There are two fundamental stumbling blocks that I see. The first has to do with what is in proccessed foods and the second, how basic health care is administered.
    If research in the area of the American diet is properly analyzed, the conclusion emerges that simple sugars, especially high fructose corn syrup as ingredients in processed foods are having a disastrous impact on the health of most Americans. Secondly, There is an alternative to sugar called Stevia, which is a South American plant that could easily replace simple sugars in the processing of our foods with an FDA rule change as to its definition as a sweetener. I understand that corporations have a major stake in products such as high fructose corn syrup and refined table sugar and can lose revenue as well as a reduction in share value; however, there are other uses for corn etc., such as Ethanol and Bio-plastics.
    To often, the uninsured seek costly medical attention either through emergency rooms, or Medicaid etc., while most working people pay through Health Maintenance Organizations. It would be much more cost effective and fair if all Americans were afforded “basic” coverage by the government through competing HMO’s I will call Americare. Those who want more than the universally provided “basic” coverage would simply pay for it out of pocket, PPO’s, or through private insurance companies while still being part of the “Americare” system.
    Sincerely, Joseph Hawkins.

  • http://magyartruth.blogspot.com/ Chief RZ

    Lik-  Or that other communist, union organizer…

    I did talk with three Canadians while in Oklahoma City last week.  They stated that they supported "universal coverage".   This merely trades time for money.  Their new conservative government may be able to modify this disaster and failed idea, but it will take time.  In the meantime, the Canadians said that those with the means merely drive south of the border. 

    We should not repeat their mistakes.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ likwidshoe

    What else is surprising about this new law? Union shops are exempt (Section 32).

    Why is that surprising? It is completely understandable when one realizes that unions are nothing more than legal mafia cartels.

    Now where is Puzzlefeet to wax poetic excuses about these glaring double standards? (Puzzlefeet is a regular commenter here who is a union apologist for those who don’t know.)

  • Bat One

    That gurggling sound in the background is a combination of Mitt Romney’s presidential prospects and the economy of the state of Massachusets both swirling around down the bowl and out to the septic tank.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/ Seth Yantiss

    That gurggling sound in the background is a combination of Mitt Romney’s presidential prospects and the economy of the state of Massachusets both swirling around down the bowl and out to the septic tank.

    Excellent analogy! 

    {sarcasm} 

    Of course, if it were not for this bill Millions of Mass-Holes would not be able to see a doctor…

    /sarcasm

  • Anonymous

    Watch for this law to get scrapped by an ERISA challenge. Same thing happened to Maryland’s Wal_mart bill.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development