Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Wednesday, December 31, 2003

Being Smart About Crime

From Fox News:

Being "tough on crime" used to be a popular political slogan but nowadays it's in fashion to be "smart on crime" instead.

Politicians are also finding that it's cost-effective to implement alternative forms of punishment in the criminal justice system.

States across the country are doing away with mandatory minimum sentences (search), relaxing parole rules and diverting drug offenders to less costly treatment programs.

In states like California, officials say some of those measures are going to help better rehabilitate low-risk offenders while also saving hundreds of millions of dollars.


In theory, this is a good idea. In practice, it may become complicated. Looking at the recent Dru Sjodin case, it makes sense to free people from jail who are in on minor offenses in order to have room and resources for more serious offenders like rapists and sexual predators. But who gets to decide what offenders get released from prison? There's the rub.

We all have a group of criminals that we particularly despise. Most of us agree that rapists and murderers belong in prison but are somewhat divided when it comes to lesser crimes. Some people reserve a special kind of hate for drunk drivers while others choose to focus their dislike on drug addicts. What we need to do is figure out who is least likely to do the most damage when let out of jail.

Drunk drivers, for instance, would be a bad choice. Putting more drunks on the road would obviously raise the level of public danger. In my opinion, the same can be said for all sexual offenders.

Personally, I think we should let the pot heads out. If a person is in jail for the sole reason of selling marijuana, using marijuana or possessing marijuana then we should let 'em out. However, if the person is in jail for smoking pot while driving, or committing another crime to purchase pot then they shouldn't be eligible. Marijuana should also be legalized and taxed.

I know many of you probably have a special little pocket of hatred in your heart for weed, but c'mon. Its not that bad. Really, its no more intoxicating than alcohol. Many talk about weed's status as a "gateway drug" which can lead to harder substances like heroin. I would submit that its not so much the use of a particular drug that can start you on that downard spiral, but the practice of a particular type of lifestyle. Abusing alcohol can also lead you down that spiral.

These actions would lift a tremendous burden from our law enforcement agencies and allow them to concentrate on more serious criminals.

Comments

Avatar for Kris

I also realize that it costs money to keep violent offenders locked up. so, lets pay for it. Once again, keep the violent offenders in, release on terms the non-violent offender into a restitution program. (make them help pay,to keep the violent offenders behind bars. why not?) That way, society will not waste funds for their incarceration, but gain funds they otherwise wouldn’t have had, to keep the violents locked up.

Who would you rather run into on a dark deserted street, Ted Bundy...or Martha Stewart? If one of them has to be behind bars, I think the answer to that question is a no-brainer. I also agree that the death penalty is flawed, and that is my problem with it. I don’t want an innocent to die, while the actually perp is still running around. I don’t have a problem with paying to keep them behind bars for the rest of their lives. I spend money on way more frivolous things than that. Thats the price we will just have to pay to keep our lives safer. Consider how much the taxpayers pay for each crime, and recurring crime that is committed? I saw the link about the overtime etc that had to be paid, all the paid man hours, the public defender fee’s, legal processes etc. I would rather have paid to keep AR locked up, than to have to redirect those monies to the aftermath of the crimes he committed once released.

There are ways to solve this problem, and I want my babies to be protected, bottom line. I will pay, and pay, and pay. My son’s National Guard Unit ships off to Iraq next month. They are going without complaint to protect all of us from harms way, and they are sacrificing so much more than money. Think of the families like his (he has a 4 year old daughter he will leave behind) that are paying for our safety with more than just money. Its just something that must be done...so lets all do our part to care for each other.

Kris on December 31, 2003 at 12:12 pm
Avatar for Kris

Its the American Way, and I am so proud to have that opportunity. You know, we complain about how our Government handles protecting us from violent Criminals (and we should keep working for the best solutions), but remember this...in Iraq, Government was the “Violent Criminal who killed and tortured its citizens, and there was no one to protect them.

God Bless America for shining its light, in this dark world. I am honored to be an American Citizen, and never more so, than today.

Kris on December 31, 2003 at 12:12 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.