Barrack Obama Doesn’t Know What Federalism Means
It’s just a bit of political posturing and pandering starring this campaign season’s favorite victim group (Katrina survivors), but the lesson here is important. Obama, like most liberals, simply does not care about the federalist principles this country was founded upon.
NEW ORLEANS - Democrat Barack Obama said Sunday the country cannot fail New Orleans again and that as president, he would keep the city in mind every day.
“The words never again cannot be another empty phrase,” he said in front of one of the few rebuilt houses he saw on a brief tour of the city’s Gentilly Woods section. “It cannot become another broken promise.”
The “country” (by which Obama means the federal government) didn’t fail the people of New Orleans. Mayor Ray Naggin, and Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco, failed the people of New Orleans.
See, in this country we believe in local control. We were founded as a national of individualist, and we didn’t believe that a nation of individuals could be run effectively with decisions being made by one central governing body. So we have a nation made up of sovereign states which themselves are divided into smaller governing bodies (counties, cities, etc.). This allowed each locality to effectively make the decisions best for that locality without necessarily cramming those decisions down the throats of those living in other localities for whom those decisions may not be best.
We are, after all, a large and diverse nation with a plethora of opinions and values. The idea of governing to everyone’s satisfaction from Washington D.C. is absurd.
But back to the point, with local decision-making power comes local responsibility. In the Katrina situation the local powers-that-be failed those responsibilities miserably, and then tried to pass the buck on to the federal level. Which they were largely successful at given that they had a sympathetic press corps at their disposal who just happens to harbor a visceral dislike of of the current President.
Were there problems with the federal response to Katrina? Sure. But we should be asking ourselves why we’re counting on federal authorities to respond to local weather disasters when that sort of response could be organized and executed so much more effectively on the local level.
Obama doesn’t ask that question, he just panders. Because like most liberals he doesn’t adhere to the principles of federalism. He adheres to the big-government, quasi-socialist teachings of big-government liberalism.















