Barney Frank On Bank Nationalization: We Are Saving “Capitalism From Its Own Excesses”
House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank said the Bush administration’s decision to invest directly in banks is a turning point in the debate over regulation. “It has definitely changed Washington, very dramatically,” the Massachusetts Democrat said. “Two years ago, the prevailing opinion was [that] we needed to deregulate further. Now, the argument is [over] what kind of new regulation we need.”
Rep. Frank plans to convene a hearing next week to explore how to strengthen oversight of financial markets. Committee aides are expected to focus on developing legislative recommendations the rest of the year; that would set the stage for action on a sweeping bill early in 2009, when the new Congress is seated.
“This is equivalent to what FDR had to do…to save capitalism from its own excesses,” Rep. Frank said, referring to measures taken by President Franklin D. Roosevelt to calm markets and protect investors during the Great Depression.
First, I’m not convinced that this bank nationalization is even necessary. I think it’s a power-grab by a government (up to and including President Bush) that is using a hysteria they themselves perpetrated to excuse it.
Second, the excesses of capitalism? Give me a break. At the very heart of this financial collapse was two government sponsored entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, that owned 51% of the nation’s $12 trillion mortgage industry. Those two companies owned all those mortgages because they were being pressured by the government and activists to buy up bad loans on questionable properties made to financially marginal borrowers.
That wouldn’t have happened in a free market situation. Or, if it was happening, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac wouldn’t have lasted long enough to get to a point where they controlled over 50% of the market. That they did, and that they controlled over half of the market, was because they were sponsored by the government and were benefiting from government intervention in borrowing/lending decisions.
This has nothing to do with capitalism, and everything to do with the excesses of government.



