Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Thursday, July 17, 2008

Barack Obama Has 300 Foreign Policy Advisers To Tell Him What To Think About World Events

I knew his campaign was bloated, but this is ridiculous:

WASHINGTON — Every day around 8 a.m., foreign policy aides at Senator Barack Obama’s Chicago campaign headquarters send him two e-mails: a briefing on major world developments over the previous 24 hours and a set of questions, accompanied by suggested answers, that the candidate is likely to be asked about international relations during the day.

One recent Q. & A. asked, for example, whether Mr. Obama supported the decision by Iraq’s prime minister, Nuri Kamal al-Maliki, to include a timetable for American troop withdrawal in any new security agreements with the United States. The answer, provided to Mr. Obama with bullet points, was yes — or “a genuine opportunity,” as he put it in a speech on Iraq this week.

Behind the e-mail messages is a tight-knit group of aides supported by a huge 300-person foreign policy campaign bureaucracy, organized like a mini State Department, to assist a candidate whose limited national security experience remains a concern to many voters.

One of the left’s most popular meme’s about President Bush is the idea that he’s just a talking puppet.  The not-so-bright public face of his adviser’s.  Well note that Obama apparently gets emails from this gigantic campaign bureaucracy telling him whether or not he supports certain world developments.

Not exactly what you expect from a leader, no?  I mean, shouldn’t the advisers provide advice and information so that the leader can decide for himself whether or not he supports something?  Do we really want a leader who doesn’t make up his own mind but rather relies on a support staff of hundreds to grind out his decisions for him?

If you could even call such a person a “leader” to begin with.

Regardless, you’d think Obama would take a clue from the old “too many cooks in the kitchen” adage.  But then, when you’re a candidate with a thin resume and little more than pretty-but-vague rhetoric that aspires to be all things to all people you need a vast network of bureaucrats to tell you how to think.

Comments

I have no problem with advisors, as long as that is what they are.... advising.

It should be a leader, or hell, even a manager of a company, to take opinions and advice from those under him, and then make a decision based on what he has been given for information.

The answer, provided to Mr. Obama with bullet points, was yes — or “a genuine opportunity,” as he put it in a speech on Iraq this week.

But that does not seem to be the case here. It seems Obama is being told what to say andwhat to think on subjects, instead of taking what he is given and deciding for himself how to proceed.

That is not a leader.

Hell, that isn’t even a manager.

sanity on July 17, 2008 at 10:17 pm

Barack Obama Has 300 Foreign Policy Advisers To Tell Him What To Think About World Events

And that doesn’t include the ones he’s already thrown under the bus.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on July 17, 2008 at 10:30 pm
Avatar for Texan Across the Pond

....If you can get a thousand monkeys to bang on a thousand typerwriters for a thousand years, eventually you’ll get “War and Peace”......

Texan Across the Pond on July 17, 2008 at 11:06 pm
Rob
Rob
17909 comments
Send a private message

Advisers are great.  Every leader should have advisers, preferably of differing viewpoints so that the leader gets input from all sides of a given issue.

That being said, getting talking points that essentially boil down to “this is what you think” is not advice.

And 300 is excessive even if these advisers weren’t telling Obama what to think.


When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.

-- Thomas Jefferson

Rob’s recently listened-to songs:

robport.gif border=0

Rob on July 17, 2008 at 11:11 pm
Avatar for Bullwinkle

He may need them all judging by the amount of assholery he spouts on the subject. Now if he’d just listen to them…

Bullwinkle on July 18, 2008 at 02:42 am
Avatar for David J.

That’s 50 more people than in my whole squadron!

David J. on July 18, 2008 at 10:49 am

Perhaps the number of Obama’s advisors explains why his policy pronouncements are so obtuse, indecisive, and subject to endless revision and refinement.  If he had fewer advisors, he probably wouldn’t appear to be so confused and inclined to flip-flop so often.


“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Bat One on July 18, 2008 at 10:56 am
Avatar for muffler

Check the source of this information.  Do you really think it is possible for anyone to have 300 advisors?  He couldn’t possible handle that many voices.It’s totally fabricated information. 

Elisabeth Bumiller, who wrote this article, has supported the Bush administration as a white house correspondent and is writing the biography of Condi Rice.  The whole thing is meant to create more distraction.  Take a step back and think about it.

muffler on July 18, 2008 at 01:53 pm
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.