Back to the Future: Carter Wasted 19 Billion on Alternative Fuels

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Shoveling BS

The more things change.

In 1980, President Carter signed legislation that established the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, a government entity intended to drive research into synthetic fuels and establish a synthetic fuels program that would lead to energy independence. The Corporation was budgeted $19 billion by Congress, to be spent over some years. The Synthetic Fuels Corporation is one of the government’s most intrusive efforts in the energy markets.
So how well did it work? Given that we still fill our tanks at the petrol pump and that almost no one under 25 has even heard of the Synthetic Fuels Corporation, the answer should be obvious: it was a colossal failure.

Why is all of this HOPE ‘n CHANGE relying on failed ideas of the past?

Tags: ,


«
»
  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Some of those “lies” dated back to her husbands administration.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    please describe in detail for us, the shelf life of sarin and mustard gases.

    How about ricin? After the invasion, warehouses in Iraq were found full of castor beans in bags marked “fertilizer”. Does having components of WMD count in your “reality”, bob?

    BTW, nice threadjacking! If Carter were a Republican, I could see doing anything to draw attention away from his abysmal record! You go, bob! Seriously…go!

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    “This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991,” the official said, adding the munitions “are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war.”

    First I’d like to point out that, having been proved wrong, you shift the goal posts. “Saddam had no WMDs!” Well, he did. “But they were old!” Is that supposed to matter?

    Two it’s worth noting said official is wrong. These were exactly the munitions that Hanz Blix talked about when he said he didn’t believe that Saddam had every destroyed the munitions he was required to under the ceasefire. Blix had no way of knowing that said WMDs were not properly taken care of so that they were rendered useless. But these were indeed the weapons we believed we’d find.

    Sorry Bob.

    Idiot.

    You know, I’m going to break my rule here and directly engage you. For someone who mocks everyone else’s intelligence, you yourself have never said anything that remotely constitutes an intelligent thought. You post the same links over and over that lead to opinion pages…some of which disagree with you. If one takes out all the insults, threats, and blaming Republicans for everything…all you have is a “nuh uh” 6 year old response.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • robert108

    Oh Robbie, FDR killed the economy?

    Another lie from you; that’s not what I said. He stagnated the economy for eight years.

    …trying to blame Barney Frank…

    You just keep lying; Dem social engineering affirmative action home loan mandates predate Barney Frank; he just kept it going by lying about the health of Fannie and Freddie. He is an enabler, not the cause. Try to keep up.

  • http://insanereindeer.blogspot.com/ Kenny

    Thank you for acknowledging the weapons inspectors were right about Saddam not having any WMDs.

    Except he did.

    http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,103631,00.html

    Oops.

  • carrick

    So what, RBB?

    Just cause they couldn’t be used as is, doesn’t mean they weren’t salvageable.

    Since you’re an idiot, I’ll remind you part of the concern of the US was that part of this remaining stockpile would end up in the hands of terrorists.

    Keep moving the goal post, and eventually you’ll find yourself in own your locker room.

  • carrick

    RBB:

    You can argue good or bad idea but you can’t reasonably argue that there was NO reason to go in.

    Now you’re quoting people you yourself don’t believe in.

    Your problem is there is nothing wrong with my argument, so you have to flail out with lame attempts like this.

  • robert108

    Again with the Big Lie; there was a laundry list of reasons for freeing the Iraqi people from the murdering dictator. Saddam’s use of WMD on his own people was just one reason of many.

  • Dino

    Even if he did, and he didn’t, that’s a pittance compared to what bush has wasted on wars! It’s LUNCH MONEY!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    The world intelligence reports all indicated belief in Iraq’s weapons cache. Saddam did little to convince anyone he didn’t have WMD.

    Really?

    There were weapons inspectors on the ground right before the war.

    (AP) U.N. weapons inspectors climbed aboard a plane and pulled out of Iraq on Tuesday after President Bush issued a final ultimatum for Saddam Hussein to step down or face war.

    …But Saddam made a last-minute bid to avert war, admitting that Iraq had once possessed weapons of mass destruction to defend itself from Iran and Israel – but insisting that it no longer has them.

    “We are not weapons collectors,” the official Iraqi News Agency quoted him as saying. “When Saddam Hussein says he has no weapons of mass destruction, he means what he says.”

    (CNN) — Two days after resigning as the Bush administration’s top weapons inspector in Iraq, David Kay said Sunday that his group found no evidence Iraq had stockpiled unconventional weapons before the U.S.-led invasion in March.

    He said U.S. intelligence services owe President Bush an explanation for having concluded that Iraq had.

    “My summary view, based on what I’ve seen, is we’re very unlikely to find large stockpiles of weapons,” he said on National Public Radio’s “Weekend Edition.” “I don’t think they exist.”

    It was the consensus among the intelligence agencies that Iraq had such weapons that led Bush to conclude that it posed an imminent threat that justified the U.S.-led invasion, Kay said.

  • carrick

    Bob:

    We’ve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th.

    LOL. So that’s where you want to move the goal posts?

    Iraq may not have had anything to do with 9/11, but nobody on either side argues with the fact that they sponsored terrorism themselves. Which is what is important w.r.t. the issue here, namely the falling of WMD into terrorist hands.

    So this is an entirely specious argument on your part, Bob.

    Where next? We’re running out of real estate.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    Jimmy was right.

  • robert108

    “My summary view, based on what I’ve seen, is we’re very unlikely to find large stockpiles of weapons,” he said on National Public Radio’s “Weekend Edition.” “I don’t think they exist.”

    Heh. 650 tons of yellowcake.

  • brian

    Yeah, millions of free and safe Iraqis beg to differ retard. We sure got a lot of use out of all those energy schemes Carter foisted upon us. When he was President, I had to wait in line for gas and could only buy it on even numbered days. Moammar Gaddafi gave up all his weapons as well, that sure was a waste of money, huh?

  • Dino

    Hey buttmunch, when were the worst gas lines?

    1973

    THREE YEARS BEFORE CARTER.

  • robert108

    A failure that won FOUR TERMS He promoted his political career at the expense(literally) of the American people and our economy, which he stagnated for eight years with his commie programs. and rescued capitalism from the jaws of a socialist revolution. Again you descend into insane fantasy. WWII rescued our free enterprise system from FDR’s communism.

  • Dino

    “Failed FDR”. What a joke you people are. A failure that won FOUR TERMS and rescued capitalism from the jaws of a socialist revolution. Though I would have prefered the revolution.

    Hillary and the dems who voted for Iraq were fed lies about WMDs (remember the vial of baby powder Colin Powell was swinging around? The nonexistent drones?). The decision to allow your idiot prez to invade Iraq was also made after 9/11 when everyone was freaked out. Remember that dems who voted against war were given death threats from the likes of your kind.

  • bill-tb

    Carter wasted more than the money, he also gave the world Mugabe and the Iranian thugs — Who wasted a whole lot of people.

    I suspect the free Iraqis and Afghnis would dispute the waste of money on the wars that Hillary and others voted for. Oh yeah, that’s right, the very same person who The One chose for Sec of State. How do you square that circle.

    Obama energy plan sounds a lot like Carter, Obama Raw Deal sounds a lot like that of the failed FDR, Obama is just not as smart as either — and nowhere near as good of a liar as BJ Clinton.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Sarah the Socialist:

    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    And Alaska–we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs. … It’s to maximize benefits for Alaskans, not an individual company, not some multinational somewhere, but for Alaskans.

  • robert108

    Alaska has done this since long before Sarah. The lefties are just lying again.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    There was no good reason to go in.

    Saddam did not attack us.

    Saddam did not have the capability to attack us.

    Just before bush invaded Iraq his Sec of State said so.

    Just before bush invaded Iraq his NSA said so.

    Saddam did not have WMD

    The inspectors were on the ground saying Saddam did not have stockpiles of WMD

    Iraq had no air force to speak of

    Iraq had no army to speak of

    Saddam did not attack us

    Where is Usama?

    He attacked us.

    Why do you hate America?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Carter also said he would impose a windfall profit tax on oil companies.

    It took a few years, but Sarah finally imposed that tax in her state.

    Jimmy was right.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    There was no ricin. Bourgass had some castor beans and recipes for various poisons. Ricin is in any case so difficult to administer that it is a weapon of individual assassination rather than of mass destruction. And there was no plot. The other four defendants in the poisons case were acquitted and charges against a further four have been dropped. Bourgass was undoubtedly a deluded and dangerous man, as the family of DC Oake can attest, but the idea that he was part of a terrorist conspiracy to use chemical or biological agents against urban populations was itself a delusion.

    Yet the reaction of the authorities and the reporting of some of the media is no less hysterical today than it was – with more justification because so few facts were known – when Bourgass was arrested. The judge in the poisons case said Bourgass’s aim was to cause “fear and disruption with the potential for injury and widespread panic” – apparently by smearing poison on the door handles of parked cars on the Holloway Road. The BBC reported in alarmist tones not heard since Chicken Licken that a huge and deadly terrorist network had been foiled.

    It was all nonsense.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    “knew”

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

    “We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons,” Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

    …Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

    “This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991,” the official said, adding the munitions “are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war.”

    We’ve had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the September 11th.

    President Bush
    September 17, 2003

  • robert108

    Back to the Future: Carter Wasted 19 Billion on Alternative Fuels

  • robert108

    Maybe the lying lefties who claim Saddam’s WMD were “expired” should sprinkle some of them on their breakfast cereal.
    “No WMD” is refuted by finding even one.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    The United States has found 500 chemical weapons in Iraq since 2003, and more weapons of mass destruction are likely to be uncovered, two Republican lawmakers said Wednesday.

    “We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons,” Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.

    …Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

    “This does not reflect a capacity that was built up after 1991,” the official said, adding the munitions “are not the WMDs this country and the rest of the world believed Iraq had, and not the WMDs for which this country went to war.”

  • robert108

    Back to the Future: Carter Wasted 19 Billion on Alternative Fuels

    Back to the topic.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    I responded with Powell and Rice.

    Never mind…

  • FlyOnTheWall

    you respond with “youtube?”

    Never mind.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Boob, who ever said that Saddam had a direct connection to 9/11. He did have tenuous contacts with Al Qeada.

    I’m sure 9/11 was kept on a need to know basis within Al Aeada.

  • robert108

    Wrong again! Believing you know what someone else thinks, better than they know it themselves, is pure projection; in other words, the essence of projection. It’s the sign of a sick, narcissistic ego. You are projecting not only your thoughts, but your own thought process, on another. How arrogant!

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    It took a few years, but Sarah finally imposed that tax in her state.

    Not really, the state of Alaska owns that land and the oil underneath it.

    They just raised their price which was prudent management of their number on asset.

  • Mickey

    The gas lines in 1973 lasted about 3 weeks in a couple east coast states. Then the government lowered the speed limit to 55 mph. and the gas lines stopped until 1979. The gas lines in 1979 lasted several months nation wide when carter was fiddling around with price controls on oil.

    As for Iraq, the UN passed resolution 1441. The world intelligence reports all indicated belief in Iraq’s weapons cache. Saddam did little to convince anyone he didn’t have WMD. He invaded his neighbors and he killed Kurds and other ethnic Iraqi with toxic WMD. He tested our resolve before and after 911. He gambled and lost.

    Had we done nothing after 911 there is no way to tell if more severe attacks on our nation would of happened. We certainly sent a lot of jihad jokers to hell. Good riddance.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    boobs, that was two questions, but gops were never good with the math.

    When the nutters here started challenging what I had written and demanded sources/links/proof, I started pasting. Since nutters are like poodles on linoleum barking at doorbells when ever a sane person posts here, I sometimes simply post the source. Is that going to be a problem for you?

  • Mickey

    Carter also said he would impose a windfall profit tax on oil companies. What goes around comes around I guess.

    There were two periods of gas lines, one in 1973 effecting the east coast and the larger energy crisis in 1979.

    There are many interesting parallels from then and now. I wonder if they will bring back Carter’s “Misery Index” during Obama’s term?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The lines in the Carter years were absolutely to be blamed on his policy of allocating gasoline to stations.

    We haven’t seen anything like those lines since those policies were abolished. Central planning don’t work.

    Remember how his allocation policies limited how much gas a station could get, but a new station could open up and get all the gas they wanted. Crazy is the only thing to say about it.

  • robert108

    Jimmy was right.

    Jimmy was left, far left; a typical leftie money-waster.

  • di butler

    Bush did not say last week he lied about WMD’s you dufus. He said he wished they’d had better intelligence. Quit projecting, if you want someone to take you serious. And Golfmann is right, there weren’t gas lines in 73. It was 76-77 when they were so bad. How old ARE you, Dino? I’ll bet you are still in your 20′s. You weren’t even born when Carter was Prez. I remember the hard times of the Carter years, so do some others here, we are not going to buy your bull.

  • robert108

    The leftie Big Lie is that it was all about WMD, which include chemical and biological weapons, which he had already used on his own people. There was a laundry list of reasons for going into Iraq to liberate the Iraqi people, but the lying lefties just ignore it.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Because the state of Alaska OWNS the oil. As governor she has a duty to watch that investment for the people of Alaska.

  • robert108

    Notice how the lefties are desperately trying to change the subject from Carter’s energy debacle and his wasteful spending on govt energy subsidies.

  • http://www.wethepeopleforum.com/forum/forums.asp golfmann

    There weren’t gas lines in 1973…

    I was there…

  • Dino

    Yep, right on schedule.

    When a conservative fails, they weren’t a “real” conservative.

    Idiot.

  • robert108

    The real problem with rbb’s Big Lie here is that “No WMD” only requires one actual WMD to refute it. The lefties got screwed by their own excess here. Nice distraction from Carter’s energy debacle, though.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    NO thanks I bought all of the swamp land in Western Iraq.

    By the way Moron, do you want to explain how Nixon’s “criminal activity” caused a recession.

    Not that I’m any fan of his agenda, price controls, OSHA etc were stupid.

  • FlyOnTheWall

    Excuse me, you were saying?

    RBB, you’re missing Carricks’ point that:

    …nobody on either side argues with the fact that they sponsored terrorism themselves.

    I’d further add that the Iraq war never really ended since they never complied to the requirements, including firing on our planes, etc.

    You can argue good or bad idea but you can’t reasonably argue that there was NO reason to go in. Look through CNN for Iraq related articles from 1994 to 2002. Iraq was THE bad guy for a decade, the fact they aren’t now doesn’t mean they never were.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • Man Train

    Projection is the act of attributing one’s own unwanted qualities onto others. Look it up you fucking moron.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    boobs, no.

  • Man Train

    realitybasedbob,

    I think what Ken is trying to say is that self defense is a punishable crime. Besides, Iraq was asking for it. Just look at how Iraq was dressed. Why would Iraq dress like that if it didn’t want to get bombed?

    Sorry for the rapist defense testimony…

  • robert108

    I think what Ken is trying to say…

    The essence of projection.

  • carrick

    RBB:

    There were weapons inspectors on the ground right before the war.

    And had they been full access–hardly a plausible scenario in totalitarian state like Iraq–that might have meant something.

    Just because somebody gets the right answer in the end, doesn’t mean that the way they got that answer was in any way sensible. This is such a case of that.

  • carrick

    BTW, in my answer I was assuming the binary form of sarin, which is typical of Sadam’s nerve gas arsenal. This has a half-life of 5 years, so in 10 years, you would have 1/4 the original potency. However, this is still plenty lethal as a terrorist threat, where it to get into the wrong hands.

    In terms of mustard gas, we still have stockpiles from the 1970s. Somehow the same people who are unconcerned about stockpiles in Iraq, are getting bent over aging stockpiles and the threat to the community from these aging weapons.

    One can argue the relative probability of poison gas stockpiles falling into the terrorists hands, that’s another argument. But there really isn’t anything to seriously argue about regarding the relative threat, even with old weapons such as these, were that to happen.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The 1973 problems were because the Arabs embargoed their oil to us due to us helping Israel in the Yom Kippur war.

    The supply wasn’t there.

    (Turns out it was bad for them and they soon turned it back on.)

    The supply was there in the Carter years, but peanuts had to meddle in what he couldn’t understand.

  • http://proof-proofpositive.blogspot.com/ proof_positive

    BTW, (back to the thread): Nice parallel symbolism in the token shovel being tossed by Carter and O.

    Our cookies will follow.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    You probably are just too ignorant to realize that Obama’s energy plan sounds just like Carter’s.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Poor widdle dim Senators can’t think for themselves?

    Not really. The body of evidence was there that Saddam was a threat.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Thank you for acknowledging the weapons inspectors were right about Saddam not having any WMDs.

  • Dino

    Even your idiot leader bush said publicly last week that he regreted lying by using fake intelligence.

    Oh Robbie, FDR killed the economy? LOL, not surprising coming from an idiot who is trying to blame Barney Frank for the 8 ruinous bush/republican Congress years.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Who new that GWB could juggle with a shovel?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    The thing about the stockpiles isn’t that Saddam didn’t have them. It’s what happened to them.

  • http://www.valleydeals.com/cgi-bin/board2/YaBB.pl Kevin

    Jimmy Peanuts wanted everyone to wear a hair shirt since he has pathological guilt about growing up as privileged white boy in the South.

  • http://www.bikebubba.blogspot.com/ Bike Bubba

    Or, put differently, how much more dependent on foreign oil are we due to Jimmuh, and how much of the wars we’re fighting today are the direct result of his failure to put together sensible petroleum industry laws?

    Oh, yeah, that windfall profits tax he loved has consequences, doesn’t it?

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    You can argue good or bad idea but you can’t reasonably argue that there was NO reason to go in.

  • di butler

    Boob,

    I just have one question. If the cut/paste feature was disabled, would that mean you’d be mute? I have yet to read a single well thought out post from you. Or any post written by you, w/o some shit pasted in. Do you have to carry around visuals in the real world to get your point across?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    please describe in detail for us, the shelf life of sarin and mustard gases.

    It seems to me that there would be a different standard of effectiveness for military or terrorist purposes.

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    I’m pretty sure that degraded chemical weapons would be effective terrorist weapons.

  • carrick

    RBB:

    please describe in detail for us, the shelf life of sarin and mustard gases.

    LOL. Like a detailed discussion would mean anything to you.

    Mustard gas contained within shells buried in the desert would likely remain potent for decades, probably longer than the explosives that were in place to disperse the chemical.

    Sarin has a shorter half-life, so if you were using 10-year old shells, you wouldn’t get the same kill radius, but that is another thing than saying it is no longer useful as a terrorist weapon.

    Thank your for proving my point.

    Actually, you never had one.

  • Dino

    Hilarious to see you people groping for democrats to blame and reaching back to Carter!

    Those 30 years of republican dominance? Fuggedaboutit! It was YOU-TOE-PEE-UH!

  • carrick

    Oh, lookie.

    Bob wants to change the subject now.

  • carrick

    So where do we move the goal post to now, Bob?

  • Dino

    Oh yeah, whistler-stem, the weapons were shipped under ground to Syria, right?

    Wanna buy some swampland in Florida?

  • carrick

    Man Train:

    I think what Ken is trying to say is that self defense is a punishable crime.

    raped women = murderous dictator.

    What a great analog.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Thank your for proving my point.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Kenny The Genius, linked to an article stating:

    The munitions found contain sarin and mustard gases, Army Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said. Sarin attacks the neurological system and is potentially lethal.

    It is well known that these munitions were manufactured in the early 1990′s.

    C, please describe in detail for us, the shelf life of sarin and mustard gases.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    …Offering the official administration response to FOX News, a senior Defense Department official pointed out that the chemical weapons were not in useable conditions.

  • Dino

    But promoted extensively and deceptively by bush’s admin to beat the drum of war.

  • robert108

    Fiscally speaking, Nixon was liberal Republican, and you know how that works out. Only real fiscal conservatism works. Wasteful govt spending is the enemy of prosperity.

  • Dino

    Such idiots. There were horrendous gas lines in 73 and not just in a few eastern states. I was living in St Louis and remember going to get gas with my Dad the night they announced the stations were closing. It was pandemonium even in the suburbs where we lived. Gridlock. Panic.

    From the State Department website:

    Second Arab Oil Embargo, 1973-1974

    The Second Arab Oil Embargo, which lasted from October 1973 to March 1974, posed a major threat to the U.S. economy. Moreover, the Nixon Administration’s efforts to address the effects of the embargo ultimately presented the United States with many foreign policy challenges.

    During the October 1973 Arab-Israeli War, the Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) announced an embargo against the United States in response to the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military during the war. Arab oil producers also extended the embargo to other countries that supported Israel. The embargo both banned petroleum exports to the targeted nations and introduced cuts in oil production. Several years of negotiations between oil producing nations and oil companies had already destabilized a decades-old system of oil pricing, and thus the Arab oil embargo was particularly effective.

    Implementation of the embargo, and the changing nature of oil contracts, set off an upward spiral in oil prices that had global implications. The price of oil per barrel doubled, then quadrupled, leading to increased costs for consumers world-wide and to the potential for budgetary collapse in less stable economies. Since the embargo coincided with a devaluation of the dollar, a global recession appeared imminent. U.S. allies in Europe and Japan had stockpiled oil supplies and thus had a short term cushion, but the longer term possibility of high oil prices and recession created a strong rift within the Atlantic alliance. European nations and Japan sought to disassociate themselves from the U.S. Middle East policy. The United States, which faced growing oil consumption and dwindling domestic reserves and was more reliant on imported oil than ever before, had to negotiate an end to the embargo from a weaker international position. To complicate the situation, Arab oil producers had linked an end to the embargo to successful U.S. efforts to create peace in the Middle East.

    To address these developments the United States announced Project Independence to promote domestic energy independence. It also engaged in intensive diplomatic efforts among its allies, promoting a consumers’ union that would provide strategic depth and a consumers’ cartel to control oil pricing. Both of these efforts were only partially successful.

    The Nixon Administration also began a parallel set of negotiations with Arab oil producers to end the embargo, and with Egypt, Syria, and Israel to arrange an Israeli pull back from the Sinai and the Golan Heights. By January 18, 1974 Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had negotiated an Israeli troop withdrawal from parts of the Sinai. The promise of a negotiated settlement between Israel and Syria was sufficient to convince Arab oil producers to lift the embargo in March 1974. By May, Israel agreed to withdraw from the Golan Heights.

    There was also a DEEP, UGLY recession in 74 thanks to Nixon’s criminal activity.

    The 1974-1975 Recession in the U.S.

    If you brainstems want to pretend that everything was peaches & cream before Carter took office, go for it. But you’re only showing how very stupid you are.

    Carter inherited a MESS just Obama is. Reagan then convinced the stupid as f**K masses that if they simply turned the treasury over to the wealthy we’d all be farting through silk.

    That began a long, slow unwinding of this cesspool country to the point we’re at now. We’re BRAZIL. Shitty, declining and with a huge gulf between rich and poor with opportunity evaporating for all but the top 10%.

    Hope your stupid kids enjoy poverty. That’s what most of them will get thanks to your devotion to republicans.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • robert108

    Back to the Future: Carter Wasted 19 Billion on Alternative Fuels

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    Jimmy was right.

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob

    You mean the overhead flights that were dropping bombs on Iraq before bush invaded? The bombings Tommy Franks admitted to?

  • http://SayAnythingBlog.com The_Whistler_ofnd

    Well what do you consider proper petroleum laws.

    Mostly I think the government needs to back off of the domestic energy industry.

    Let’s drop unneeded regulation and have some tax breaks to encourage production of any and all domestic sources of energy.

    BTW. The text of this post was missing for a while. Thanks to Rob for fixing my HTML error.

  • carrick

    RBB:

    There was no good reason to go in.

    It wasn’t your call.

  • Man Train

    The essence of projection.

    No, moron. It was an example assumption as I do not think self defense if a punishable crime.

  • http://www.kenmccracken.blogspot.com/ Ken McCracken

    Saddam did not attack us.

    Saddam did not have the capability to attack us.

    He shot at our overflights every goddam day.

    Reason enough to invade his country and hang him from the gallows.

  • robert108

    Back to the Future: Carter Wasted 19 Billion on Alternative Fuels

  • http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/author/realitybasedbob/ realitybasedbob
  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    The idea that 9/11 was a justification for invading Iraq is a left-wing fantasy.

    Nobody has ever found where any Bush administration member suggested that Saddam had direct ties to the 9/11 attackers.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development