Australia To Join China In International Internet Censorship Initiative

Anytime you’re partnering up with China on free speech issues you know there’s a problem.

AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.
The revelations emerge as US tech giants Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, and a coalition of human rights and other groups unveiled a code of conduct aimed at safeguarding online freedom of speech and privacy.
The government has declared it will not let internet users opt out of the proposed national internet filter.
The plan was first created as a way to combat child pornography and adult content, but could be extended to include controversial websites on euthanasia or anorexia.
Communications minister Stephen Conroy revealed the mandatory censorship to the Senate estimates committee as the Global Network Initiative, bringing together leading companies, human rights organisations, academics and investors, committed the technology firms to “protect the freedom of expression and privacy rights of their users”.
Mr Conroy said trials were yet to be carried out, but “we are talking about mandatory blocking, where possible, of illegal material.”
The net nanny proposal was originally going to allow Australians who wanted uncensored access to the web the option of contacting their internet service provider to be excluded from the service.

Doing this under the guise of combating child pornography is an inspired tactic for those who would wish to control internet content, and while most of us can agree that stopping kiddie porn is an honorable and important goal I don’t think many of us will like where this is heading.
Government is notorious for mission creep. They start out with one objective, and the next thing you know the politicians and bureaucrats have expanded the scope of their mission to a hundred other objectives. First it’ll be kiddie porn. Then it’ll be porn in general (which, whatever your feelings about it, shouldn’t be illegal). Then it’ll be racism and hate speech, two terms with often highly subjective definitions. Then we’ll creep into political speech.
It will happen.
As abhorrent as kiddie porn is, and as much as I think we need to keep fighting against it and putting its perpetrators and consumers in jail, I’m willing to tolerate the status quo in exchange for keeping the government’s hands off the internet.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array di butler

    People seem to think things will change drasically when Obama takes office. Not so, it will happen in increments. It will start with stuff like this, and everyone will support it, nobody likes kiddie porn, etc. But then they will decide to push it a little further, then further, and voila! You’ve got full-fledged censorship.

  • http://vdvfamily.com/ Sphagnum

    Because, Rob, you obviously aren’t smart enough to raise your kids and keep them from porn on the internet, so you better just let the feds do it for you! Afterall, they’re doing it FOR THE CHILDREN!

  • http://www.myinternetdoorman.com/ Mr. M

    To block or not to block, that is the question. An important point that can not be overlooked when it comes to internet porn is the the problem with ID Validation… making sure the viewer is 18 or older! The second point are companies whose sole purpose is to peddle porn to unsuspecting surfers by buying up un-renewed URLs such as kidpicks.com and turning them into porn portals!

    As co-founder of My Internet Doorman, a company dedicated to educating parents and teens about the True Dangers of internet porn and the need to block porn, I have heard first hand accounts of theporn addiction some of our clients are battling and their gratitude for our help in blocking porn through our fully managed internet filter
    service!

    Being in the business of blocking porn, I can tell you, it’s not easy for a parent to stay on top of the game; internet porn is a moving target! Between proxy anonymizers, passwords, back-doors, and the hundreds of new URLs a day…parents and traditional filters don’t stand a chance. Yes, porn is everywhere… and yes most porn is legal… and yes, as a parent or adult who wants to self-censore it should not have to be a full time job!

    Mr. M — My Internet Doorman

  • http://vdvfamily.com/ Sphagnum

    The scary thing is they did it in steps that you could see happening here. They first created a “voluntary” system, that you could opt out of, “for the children”. I could see America going along with that, as long as it’s voluntary, and then later on down the road just make it impossible to opt out of. Then you have gov’t bureaucrats in charge of what websites you can visit in your house! Sounds scary!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com/ goon

    This could happen in the USA as well..

  • Neiman

    Mandatory Internet Censorship

    Posted on Reader Blogs earlier today!

  • http://sayanythingblog.com robport

    Seems to me that, for parents concerned about internet content (perfectly legitimate concern), there are plenty of privately available filters available.

    OpenDNS, for instance, provides filtering you can set up right on your router so that any computer using your wireless access would have their content filtered.

    Why not just leave it at that?

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development