Associated Press Uses Leaked Katrina Records To Blast Bush
The Associated Press has obtained leaked Katrina documents, and video, from an anonymous government source and has used that information to write an absolutely scalding review of the Bush administration’s response to the hurricane.
To be honest with you, I’m not quite sure what to make of it all. A big problem I have is that while the AP article is that it is long on accusation and pretty short on supporting details. The reporter responsible for it takes the liberty of summarizing the information that has been revealed, yet none of the source documentation has been made public.
John Hinderaker has written a thorough review of the article and concludes with this:
The AP article is fatally compromised by its factual errors, and adds nothing to our understanding of the issues surrounding Hurricane Katrina. It also raises an important point about the leaks that form the basis for many news stories these days. The AP took what appears to have been a substantial quantity of leaked material, and turned it into a brief against the Bush administration. Whether the documents themselves contain anything noteworthy, and whether, on balance, they support the AP’s tendentious interpretation, is impossible to tell. In view of the fact that no one trusts the AP, the New York Times and other news outlets who make use of leaked documents and other materials to report on them objectively, here is a modest proposal: let us see them. If the AP will release the leaked materials, the rest of us will quickly figure out what significance, if any, they have.
I agree. Be sure to read the whole thing.
The media is not in a position to ask the public to trust them. If we are going to castigate the Bush administration for its response to Katrina we should do so based on evidence that is public, not hidden away in some reporter’s office.
Update:
Here’s an AP video report with excerpts of the video in question:
Boy Tim, You and all the rest of the libs must spend all your waking hours trying to impeach Bush and part of your sleeping hours too! You might need a colonic to help you???…
Puzzlefeet:
Except the "grave grave concerns" were based on a storm that never happened, and the meteorologist completely overstated the danger from the storm. As I pointed out, nobody predicted the events that occurred that caused the flooding of New Orleans. Had it not been for crapped-up engineering and construction, the city would have mostly stayed dry.
My calves are sore from playing Ultimate Frisbee last night and it’s Bush’s fault that it’s not fixed. If we weren’t spending so much on the war, tax dollars could have been spent on getting me a massage.
IMPEACH BUSH!!!!!!
There’s NO WAY that I should have to pay for a massage! I play every Wednesday night and he KNOWS IT!!!! I should have had a masseuse waiting for me when I got home.
IMPEACH BUSH!!!!!
for all those minimizing the grave concerns expressed at the meeting and saying the hurricane was much less than anticipated, makes it all the worse for Bush. He said they were fully prepared and even then with a cat 3 couldn’t perform as he told them they were "fully prepared. So assuming arguendo that you assessment is correct, he still failed miserably at being "fully prepared" to deal with the aftermath.
I think Bush would have been better off saying that yes, this was indeed the big one, catostrophic and we did the best we could do. But you all hang on to the topped argument if it works for you.
Boy Rob, you and Rush Limbaugh must have spend all your waking hours, and even some of you sleep time, figuring out how to defend Bush on every issue he screws up on.
And my point is everbody knew the severity of the situation. Always have. Blaming W for the lack of action taken by those who should have evaced the affected areas is stupid. Spin&twist, duck&dodge, never blame those responsible, always blame G. Bush. Your talking points are stupid, why do you keep harping them. Is it to convince yourself? The people of N.O. and the Gulf Coast know who dropped the ball, they don’t need convinced.
What did he lie about?
Paraphrasing, "no one could have anticipated that the levees would break", the video quite clearly contradicts that assertion. Bush repeated this assertion as recently as yesterday in his interview with ABC news.
The video shows Bush watching a presentation from his ranch of a meteorologist stating emphatically that breaching of the levees should be of great concern.
Assrocket ignores this blatant evidence. The administration is evidently now in damage-control mode, once again, as the facts they thought were safely hidden, come to light.
But, not to worry SA’ers – your man of principle was so concerned about the levees breaking that he flew directly to San Diego for a fundraiser.
Meterologist, Category 5 storm, bigger than Andrew, "grave grave concerns" about the levees. Even. Brownie sounded the alarm. talked about a catostrophe within a catostrophe. Bush told the local officials that that we are fully prepared".
You are all trying to make it sound like a trickle coming over the top is what was meant by the meterologist describing a category 5 hurricane bigger, bigger than Hurricane Andrew, that the levees could be topped and had grave, grave concerns. All this said at the same time.
What more could the meterologist have said to Bush to make his point? Once again, you all are trying to minimize the impact the seriousness of this tape because the meterologist didn’t use the magic word "breach" as if that would have made Bush sit up and take notice, that "grave grave concerns" or "Category 5" " bigger bigger than Andrew" words used by the meterologist just weren’t strong enough but if he would have just said breach then the cavlry would have been called.
Absolutely unbelievable. You take one word that wasn’t said "breach" and then take that to mean the entire meeting was no big deal. Unbelievable. You guys can’t be serious here.
Puzzlefoot shows his ignorance of the facts:
It was only a Category 3 by the time it reached New Orleans. None of the main levee breaches (17th St, Industrial Canal) were the result of overtopping, but rather the result of poor engineering design and construction errors. None of this was predicted up front for obvious reasons.
The St Bernard Parish flooding was the consequence of the underutilized (man made) MRGO channel, which allowed the storm surge from the gulf to reach the lower part of the New Orleans metropolis.
Ultimately these problems were thirty years in the making, and could not have been corrected in a mere four year span (it takes 10 years to build a properly constructed earthen levee for example). Bush has his share of the blame for inadequacies in the federal response, especially those associated with the turf wars between FEMA and HLS. Obviously you can’t blame Bush for problems decades in the making or inadequacies in either the New Orleans or Louisiana governments.
I find it laughable that loud-mouthed critics of Bush can’t even basic facts right, but expect everybody to take them seriously in spite of their inadequate grasp of the basic facts.
The fed. gov. for almost a century has forked billions of fed. funds into the levee! The money provided should have been used to fix the problem with the design or whatever they needed to do. How is that the Presidents fault? The President had all kinds of help ready willing and able to go. The corrupt State of Louisiana and it’s Governor refused it??? President Bush or the fed. gov. can’t just barge in and make demands to States or he would have been critisized for that too. This is just another pathetic attempt on behalf of Libs. to try to belittle and further their push for his impeachment!
Carrick: Thanks for the weather update; it’s always good to get out the truth.
Carrick, 2hotel9 and ZsaZsa, the point of my posts was plain and simple and you are all making other point unrelated to what I said. I will say again, Bush was warned ahead of time of the "grave grave concerns, that this would be bigger than Andrew, much bigger, that the Dome could be a catostrophe within a catostrophe. That’s the point. Yes, it was ACTUALLY a category 3 did not lessen the catostrophic damage of the hurricane or lessen the urgency that the meterologist nor even Brownie.
My point is this and I will say it clearly and succinctly: Bush was clearly warned of the "GRAVE GRAVE concerns with the approaching hurricane. But for you all to dismiss what Bush knew and was clearly told during this meeting and goes on TV four days later and say no one anticipated what would happen is sheer chutzpah. He told the officials that we "were fully prepared".
My point is he knew of the severity and grave concerns with the NO situation and the entire coast and then goes on TV and claims no one anticipated this would happen. That, my friends, is a bald faced lie. Lie, Lie, Lie.
Assuming arguendo, that I agree with what you all said in your posts, it does not negate one iota what the President was told during the meeting and what he said 4 days later.
How can we criticize President Bush just because he didn’t anticipate that this video would come out?
P: Actually, the President told the truth. Someone guessed that the levees would be overtopped by the storm, but they weren’t. What actually happened, that the storm would die out as much as it did, and that it would pass NO by, and that the levees would be breached after the storm, was not anticipated by anyone. So, when he said: "Nobody anticipated…" he was telling the truth. What part of that don’t you understand? Is your hate that strong that it prevents you from admitting the truth, just like the Dems and the MSM?
Puzzlefoot:
I doubled checked the numbers. I was wrong.
It was a category 1 when it hit NO. It was a category 3 when it first made landfall in southern MS. It had been downgraded from a Cat 5 for more than 24 hours before hitting landfall. Here’s the complete blurb:
The only one ignoring anything here is you, and it’s called "reality". The meteorologist’s briefing, in retrospect, turned out to be entirely
An election campaign promise from Gov Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana:
I wish the media would give as much attention to this video of Blanco making a campaign promise—which she obviously lied about—what she would do if a Category 5 Hurricane hit Louisiana:
Likwidshoe, and you are in denial. Keep those rose colored glasses on if it helps you through the day.
likwidshoe. you hook on the word breach but totally ignore the fact that the meteorologist, said the storm was Cat 5, bigger substantially bigger than Andrew and that he had very very grave concerns. It was also discussed that the dome could turn into a catostrophe within a catostrophe and they were worried about the morgue set up and other and recovery issues. I don’t know what else the guy could have said to make his point.
I understand fully you all are hanging on the word breach but ignore every other serious, grave, catastrophic word that was used to give a sense of urgency to the situation.
likwid: You might also ask yourself why none of the lefties even mention the damage sustained by the MS coast, and later, Florida? Is it because they were all white people? In the case of the Florida ‘cane, rich white people. The lefties don’t care about them, so they don’t give it any attention. They can’t play "Get the President" there, so they just ignore it. Very compassionate and caring.
But that was campaign rhetoric.
That’s what poiticians do in when they’re campaiging. They say what the public expects them and wants them to say. Once they get elected then they do what the lobbyist expects and wants them to do.
Puzzlefeet excuses herself, You are all trying to make it sound like a trickle coming over the top is what was meant by the meterologist describing a category 5 hurricane bigger, bigger than Hurricane Andrew, that the levees could be topped and had grave, grave concerns.
Oh. Now you admitted that the word used was "topped". Welcome aboard. Who is trying to make it sound like this might be a "trickle coming over the top"? You’re inventing that one up.
Once again, you all are trying to minimize the impact the seriousness of this tape because the meterologist didn’t use the magic word "breach" as if that would have made Bush sit up and take notice, that "grave grave concerns" or "Category 5" " bigger bigger than Andrew" words used by the meterologist just weren’t strong enough but if he would have just said breach then the cavlry would have been called.
No. We’re just trying to correct the record.
Absolutely unbelievable. You take one word that wasn’t said "breach" and then take that to mean the entire meeting was no big deal. Unbelievable. You guys can’t be serious here.
You’re being ridiculous and unserious. Your claim that "Bush lied" is false. That is why some of us made the point about the word "breach".
He told the officials that we "were fully prepared".
Given the knowledge that Bush had and the fact that they didn’t anticipate the levees being breached (a point that you still don’t grasp), the belief was that they were fully prepared. They were fully prepared (as far as the federal government is concerned) for the levees being topped. Understand now? Somehow, I doubt it.
My point is he knew of the severity and grave concerns with the NO situation and the entire coast and then goes on TV and claims no one anticipated this would happen. That, my friends, is a bald faced lie. Lie, Lie, Lie.
You’re like a dumb parrot. "Lie squawk!" "Lie squawk!"
Tim spits, Boy Rob, you and Rush Limbaugh must have spend all your waking hours, and even some of you sleep time, figuring out how to defend Bush on every issue he screws up on.
Great argument Tim. You convinced,…well,..nobody. Don’t address what the meeting was actually about. Just say some stupid insult and be done.
What part of that don’t you understand?
Puzzlefeet is in denial and needs her hate colored glasses to get through the day.
likwidshoe, my point was not what the storm actually was, but was said during the meeting about the potential of the storm and what was anticipated.
You don’t even know what was said. That’s the problem here. You think you hear one thing and then run with it while parroting, "Bush lied", "Bush lied".
My point is that Bush knew that this was a distinct possibility and then went on TV and said no one anciticpated this. Hogwash!
They didn’t anticipate the levees being breached. Keep on ignoring that point.
Parrot.
Tim: So it’s OK by you if a Democrat lies, even if it exposes their constituents to extreme danger, but if the President opines that the levees might overtop, but not that they might breach, this is a lie? Why the double standard? The federal isn’t the first line of response, it’s the local govt, the county govt, and the state govt. Reneging on your campaign promises doesn’t let Blanco off the hook for her negligence in preparing for Katrina.
Puzzlefeet, I’m beginning to think that you aren’t reading any of the responses to your comments.
As I pointed out
I probably woudn’t have even responded, if you hadn’t been so far off on your facts. You have basically proven that you are really clueless about the Katrina disaster, its causes, the problems with the response, their origin, and so on.
In the end, you are clearly driven by a hatred of Bush rather than by any facts related to the federal response. As has been established in this thread, you are completely bereft of the latter, but have the former in great abundance.
Rob, somehow the text of my entry got duplicated. Did I manage to do something harebrained?
likwidshoe, my point was not what the storm actually was, but was said during the meeting about the potential of the storm and what was anticipated. The levee "problem" was anticipated. And then what Pres. Bush said about the anticipation is the point I was making. It was very very grave, a cat 5, catastrophe. all very strong language. My point is that Bush knew that this was a distinct possibility and then went on TV and said no one anciticpated this. Hogwash!
Speaking of videos:
AP Has Another Video: Gov. Blanco Told President Levees Weren’t Breached Posted by Noel Sheppard on March 3, 2006 – 00:43.
The article began: “In the hectic, confused hours after Hurricane Katrina lashed the Gulf Coast, Louisiana’s governor hesitantly but mistakenly assured the Bush administration that New Orleans’ protective levees were intact, according to a new video obtained by The Associated Press showing briefings that day with federal officials.”
It then detailed what Blanco said:
It’s going to be interesting to see how much press coverage this new video gets as compared to the first one, especially as another AP article published a few hours prior to the Blanco revelations addressed new calls by Democratic lawmakers for an independent investigation into the federal response to the disaster as a result of the content of video one:
What a difference a day makes.
Hey, I live in Aust., so I don’t really care about your partisanship.
I have never read a debate over any political issue in your nation where it doesn’t become personal. What debate?
Please; can you all check your spelling and punctuation?
Thankyou.
Good point JS, and gosh, gee whiz, that weather man just didn’t say the word "breach". How can anyone take a weatherman seriously anyway? Gees, it was just predicted to be a category 5 worse than Hurricane Andrew and that he was gravely, gravely concerned. But again, he’s just the weatherman, and Bush had a birthday party to get to. He can’t be bothered with a gravely concerned weatherman predicting a category 5 hurricane that could top the levees in NO or that there could be a catostrophe within a catostrophe because Bush was cocky and told everyone there that they were "fully prepared".
Everyone knows now that it is the weatherman’s fault not Brownies. Gees what were we thinking?
PF,mcairhead,sean,and Jon. Any of you ever live in southern LA? Do any of you have an idea of how city,parrish, and state government interact to build and maintain levees and canals? Have you read the ACoE’s reports on the misappropriation of funds intended for the construction and maintence of levees and canals? Did you wonderful citizens participate in the environazi protests against building higher levees and the program to replant marshgrass and cypress trees in the boundary regions facing the Gulf of Mexico? The Feds can only suggest that people be evaced from areas, ultimately it falls on local and state officials to call for evac of population in an effected area. As for FEMA, people who have lived in hurricane zones all their lives no they can not depend on FEMA for anything. Those who have moved south over the last 20 years have a false sense of security when government agencies tell them they have the situation under control. Well that is the lie. FEMA never has anything under control, and if you think they do you will get screwed. And you deserve it.
HJ: Hope we didn’t offend your sensibilities.
likwid: Actually, trying to morph "topping" into "breaching" is real parsing, and is actually Ratheresque.
how do you have time to breathe when you’re so busy being an apologist?
seriously.
None of this matters. The Federal Government (under Bush) offered assistance to Louisiana and they were turned down. Trucks were ready to move in moments after the storms had passed and were told not to go in. Moronic, and astounding levels of incompetence can be found in the state and city leadership. The "Seriously flawed" response from FEMA didn’t help, but neither did shooting at Rescue personnel. Even if Bush had anticipated properly that the levees would collapse, his offers of help were refused.
The money to repair the levees was given by the Federal Government, as well, some years back, but local leadership spent the money on other things.
The people who stayed were told to get out. They didn’t. Busses and trains were ready and able to pull people out, but the city refused to act. Police turn to petty crime within hours of the storm. What we have here is a group of dependant people whining about who to blame for a catastrophe that we might not be capable of averting. There was FAR more damage than just N.O. Many other cities suffered massive damage too. But somehow we don’t hear about any of them?
But somehow, the Federal Government is responsible for the ABSOULTE protection of each and every citizen and non citizen of this or any other country.
Why the endless assignment of blame for something that is still more powerful than human bureaucracy and rampant Government waste and excess?
Likwidshoe, and you are in denial. Keep those rose colored glasses on if it helps you through the day.
Denial of what exactly?
Get serious.
Nah, the hard part is having to put up with folks trying to blame him for every minuscule problem that arises
Rob, give me a break here. The weather man stated that this storm was bigger than Andrew. He wanted to "absolutely clear" and also added for emphasis that he had "grave grave concerns’ with the levees.
Wow, you are the quintessential apologist for Bush, even when the language is clear. "Grave, Grave concerns". And you are standing on the word "topped". Unbelievable.
likwid: HJ’s response included personal attack on those who are imperfect with spelling and punctuation. Since he generalized about "your nation", we might all be offended at his cheekiness.
AitchJay says, I have never read a debate over any political issue in your nation where it doesn’t become personal.
1. They’re out there. 2. Politics is personal so it is hard not to get personal. This is not an excuse, just a possible explanation. 3. Politics is personal the world over. We’re hardly alone or unique in that area.
Puzzlefeet says, Bush lied to the American people and no amount of parsing words that "overtopping" the levess or the levees being breeched means anything. It is clear there was grave concern expressed and Bush went on TV and told the world that "noone anticipated that the levees would be breeched."
Bush didn’t lie. They didn’t anticipate the levees being breached. "Overtopping" is quite different from "breached". Look it up in the dictionary if you need to. You’ll see. No lie.
Yes, all sides share blame here but he is the commander in chief and he lied to all of us. period.
No he didn’t. Period.
Rob, they clearly discussed that the levees could be breech. He heard it, was in on the meeting. Bush went on TV and told the world that no one anticipated that the levees would be breeched.
Get a new battery for your hearing aid. The guy said, "I don’t think anyone can tell you with any confidence right now whether the levees will be topped or not…"
Do you understand the difference between "topped" and "breached"?
If you want to pull a Clintonesque parsing of words here, go right ahead.
There is nothing "Clintonesque" between noting the difference between the words "topped" and "breached". You’re reaching ridiculousness with that criticism.
Wow, you are the quintessential apologist for Bush, even when the language is clear. "Grave, Grave concerns". And you are standing on the word "topped". Unbelievable.
I guess that standing up and correcting the record is being an "apologist". You’re amazing.
mcair says, The video shows Bush watching a presentation from his ranch of a meteorologist stating emphatically that breaching of the levees should be of great concern.
Another one that needs a new hearing aid. Watch it again there chief.
Assrocket ignores this blatant evidence. The administration is evidently now in damage-control mode, once again, as the facts they thought were safely hidden, come to light.
You know what is funny here? You’re insulting and yet you’re so proveably wrong. Watch the video again after you get a new hearing aid.
But, not to worry SA’ers – your man of principle was so concerned about the levees breaking that he flew directly to San Diego for a fundraiser.
Blah blah blah blah. Get back to us after you get that new hearing aid and look up these words. Then maybe we can have a real discussion.
p: The reality was the the storm was smaller than Andrew when it hit land, and it missed NO almost completely. The difference between "might top" the levees and what really happened is just about the only important thing. It was the job of the locals and the state officials to make sure the Superdome and the Convention Center were stocked with food and water, and they totally failed. This was not, in any way, the fault of the President. In other words, they were wrong about the storm, and unprepared for the aftermath. This was a local responsibility.
Rob, the weatherman was clear in stating grave, grave concerns with the levees. If you want to pull a Clintonesque parsing of words here, go right ahead. But the weather service was clear in his concerns with the levees. Are there magic words that he should have used. He told the folks assembled that that this was bigger than Andrew, a category 5 and you want to parse words. Give me a break here. The fact here is that Bush told all assembled that "we were fully prepared."
puzzlefeet continues, likwidshoe. you hook on the word breach but totally ignore the fact that the meteorologist…
Whatever. Just pay attention to what is actually said the next time.
I understand fully you all are hanging on the word breach but ignore every other serious, grave, catastrophic word that was used to give a sense of urgency to the situation.
Nobody here is ignoring anything.
You should really stop inventing up reality.
Bush lied to the American people and no amount of parsing words that "overtopping" the levess or the levees being breeched means anything. It is clear there was grave concern expressed and Bush went on TV and told the world that "noone anticipated that the levees would be breeched." He told the state officials that the feds ‘were fully prepared."
Yes, all sides share blame here but he is the commander in chief and he lied to all of us. period.
Rob, they clearly discussed that the levees could be breech. He heard it, was in on the meeting. Bush went on TV and told the world that no one anticipated that the levees would be breeched.
Clintonesque parsing? The weatherman said the levees would be topped. The AP is claiming that he said they would break.
Those are two different things.
Tim, you say that as though it excuses the behavior.
He had grave, grave concerns that the levees might be topped.
Topped is not breeched.
Imagine the Hoover damn. Imagine the water rising to the point where it spills over the top. That would be bad, right? But you know what would be a thousand times worse than that and a much, much different situation? The damn breaking open.
If you want to ignore this difference to rush ahead with your Bush bashing go right ahead, but know that your criticism isn’t honest. I will wait to see if there is anything from all this worth directing honest criticism toward Bush over.
I agree robert. I linked to video of that in the post. Here’s the link again.
Not sure what would have caused that, Carrick, but I deleted the duplicate text.
What did he lie about?