Associated Press Reporter Syping For Saddam?

It certainly looks that way.
CNN Chief News Executive Eason Jordan got his agency preferential treatment and exclusive access when he kept his journalists from reporting on the worst of Saddam Hussein’s atrocities in Iraq. Kind of makes you wonder what this reporter got.
But regardless, the idea of media journalists as “objective truth-tellers” should be pretty much shot to hell for you now if it isn’t already. From journalists staging photos for Hezbollah propaganda in Lebanon to Dan Rather and Mary Mapes running a forged memo to smear a sitting President right before an election, it is clear that journalists these days are very much subjective. They aren’t about the truth so much as they’re about protecting their ideology and writing sensational headlines that will further their careers and make them lots of money.
Citizens are just going to have to learn that they can’t trust what the read in the paper or see on television any more.

Tags:


«
»
  • http://Array gregdn

    I never have ‘trusted’ a news anchor or any other form of medium. The best defense I think is to read and view them all, then distill the truth from it. Anyone who gets their information from one source alone is asking for trouble.

  • 2Hotel9

    Why is this only now being discussed? I knew of CNN’s preferential treatment and the allegations concerning backroom deals cut by Jordan and his Turner appointed bosses in ’92. What has gone entirely unreported is their shenanigans and bribe paying with the Kremlin and Chinese govenments in the ’70s and ’80s. CNN has always been dirty, the broadcast networks have only been playing catch up, never in the lead, in illicit deals for preferential treatment in these situtations.

Create a SAB Readerblog


Recent Comments

Powered by Disqus

Blog Advice and Support
Installs and Upgrades
Theme Modifications
Custom Plugins
Theme Design
Conversions and Relocations
Hacked Site Recovery
Mobile Apps Development