Home Mobile Archives Reader Blogs Register Login

Sunday, June 15, 2008

Associated Press: Bush Gives Oil Companies Right To Annoy Polar Bears

The headline doesn’t read “Bush Gives Oil Company Right To Expand Oil Production In Alaska,” which would be welcome news to Americans struggling with high gas prices.  Instead, the headline reads ”Companies Get OK to Annoy Polar Bears.” Because that’s the fair perspective on this story, right?

Less than a month after declaring polar bears a threatened species because of global warming, the Bush administration is giving oil companies permission to annoy and potentially harm them in the pursuit of oil and natural gas.

The Fish and Wildlife Service issued regulations this week providing legal protection to seven oil companies planning to search for oil and gas in the Chukchi Sea off the northwestern coast of Alaska if “small numbers” of polar bears or Pacific walruses are incidentally harmed by their activities over the next five years.

Environmentalists said the new regulations give oil companies a blank check to harass the polar bear.

So it sounds like the oil companies just got the right to do whatever they heck they want up north and slaughter any polar bears that get in their way.  Except, according to information that doesn’t even come close to support the inflammatory nature of the AP’s headline and opening paragraphs, this isn’t the case at all:

About 2,000 of the 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic live in and around the Chukchi Sea, where the government in February auctioned off oil leases to ConocoPhillips Co., Shell Oil Co. and five other companies for $2.6 billion. Over objections from environmentalists and members of Congress, the sale occurred before the bear was classified as threatened in May.

Exploring in the Chukchi Sea’s 29.7 million acres will require as many as five drill ships, one or two icebreakers, a barge, a tug and two helicopter flights per day, according to the government. Oil companies will also be making hundred of miles of ice roads and trails along the coastline.

“The oil and gas industry is operating under the kind of rules they have operated under for 15 years has not been a threat to the species,” H. Dale Hall, the Fish and Wildlife Service’s director, told The Associated Press on Friday. “It was the ice melting and the habitat going away that was a threat to the species over everything else.”

To sum up:

  • The area the oil companies will be working in are home to just 10% of the overall polar bear population.
  • This area that is open to oil exploration consists of 29.7 million acres, which works out to approximately 14,850 acres per polar bear.  I think the oil companies won’t have too hard of a time staying out of the polar bears’ way.

  • The oil companies will be operating under the same rules as they have been for the lat 15 years.  Rules that haven’t exactly resulted in a polar bear holocaust.

Unfortunately, people just skimming this article and its headline are going to get the idea that oil companies will soon be in the great white north chasing around polar bears with their trucks and ATV’s.  The truth is that the oil companies will be allowed to exploit domestic sources of petroleum to meet our country’s ever-increasing demand for it, and they’ll be doing so in the same sort of responsible manner as they have for the past several decades.

Meaning that, once again, the truth isn’t what the media would have you think it is.

Comments

This is just more of that supposedly non-existent liberal media bias.

The upside downers would have you believe that the bias doesn’t exist.

likwidshoe on June 15, 2008 at 11:00 pm

So if you’re a loyal customer to the gas station you’ll be rewarded with a polar bear coat sooner or later.

Beats getting a plate. 

We’ll see if any of the younger folks know what I’m talking about.


What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.


The Whistler's signature
The Whistler on June 16, 2008 at 05:56 am
Proof
Proof
11137 comments
Send a private message

We’ll see if any of the younger folks know what I’m talking about.

Whistler: Some times the older folks don’t know what you’re talking about! Heh.
My dad got a set of white ceramic coffee mugs from the Marathon station, one at a time. Had pheasants and other game birds painted on the side. I’ve still got ‘em.



For any voter trying to choose between the two candidates for commander in chief, there is no better test than this: When American strategy in a critical theater was up for grabs, John McCain proposed a highly unpopular and risky path, which he accurately predicted could lead to success. Barack Obama proposed a popular and politically safe route that would have led to an unnecessary and debilitating American defeat at the hands of al Qaeda.

Frederick W. Kagan

Proof on June 16, 2008 at 06:15 am
Page 1 of 1        

Post a Comment


Before commenting, please recite:

Grant me the serenity to ignore the trolls,
the courage to debate with honest opponents,
and the wisdom to know the difference.

Name   
Email   
URL   
Human?
  
 

Upload Image    

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Note: Notifications will only be sent to confirmed email addresses.