Say Anything Blog

Potential 1/4 million dollar fine and 8 years of state supervision. That’s pretty light considering what the party has in mind for the rest of us that don’t fall in line!

"we should select our leaders on principle first, electability second.”

A young man whose wisdom far exceeds his years

If he did it, he should get the maximum, pay every last cent and serve every last day of the sentence.  Cyberstalking threatens us all, and when we catch one of those scum, they should be prominently prosecuted and sentenced.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

He is a cute young man! Too bad he felt the need to do such a thing.

If he did it, he should get the maximum, pay every last cent and serve every last day of the sentence.

Five years prison for something like this is a bit steep.

I was thinking a ten figure fine and three years probation. Additional punishment as severe as not being able to use a computer for so many months or years.

At age 24, he’ll be in this mess under probation and with a felony on his record. He’s already facing a shitty future.

He reminds me of the Skakel dirt bags; good thing he was nipped in the bud!

I was thinking a ten figure fine and three years probation.

With thirty days in jail.....

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

With thirty days in jail.....

Nah, if you’re going to let him off that easy, make it 30 days cleaning out the port-a-potties with a coffee can along road constructions sites about 2 weeks after the construction crew starts complaining about the stench.

"we should select our leaders on principle first, electability second.”

A young man whose wisdom far exceeds his years

It makes me sad to be a fellow Tennessean.

You are all missing the big picture.  He just added to his resume to become a future democrat leader in this country.

atease

atease

Yes, he should get the full sentence.  And so should Bush/Cheney for cherry picking information (a.k.a. lying) with respect to WMD being in Iraq - and taking America to war based on this knowingly trumped-up data.

I’m just curious.  What specific statute did GWB break.

If your interested that information is available in the link for this like Demoratling.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

And so should Bush/Cheney for cherry picking information (a.k.a. lying) with respect to WMD being in Iraq - and taking America to war based on this knowingly trumped-up data.

That tired old leftie lie has been sooo refuted; what about the 650 tons of yellowcake, hmmm?

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

He is a cute young man! Too bad he felt the need to do such a thing.

That’s what the studs in cell block C will be saying while they barter cigarettes for his ass.

Good they are going to love him in Prison.

Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

That’s what they call studs in cell block C who will be saying while they barter
cigarettes for his ass.

I wonder if he learned this attitude from his father.  If so I can only imagine that the senior Kernell, a Democrat politician is proud of himself.

It is possible.  Because certainly we know Sarah Palins little daughter learned how to be easy with her sexual offers with men. 

I wonder if she learned her irresponsibility from her mother?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

Hiney finds it easy to kick a woman and her teenage daughter.  What a tough guy.

atease

atease

You guys are kicking a 20 year old kid.  If you want to be treated with respect, show some.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

A real man will not kick a woman or a child.  You lost this fight.

atease

atease

And the funny thing is, Palin had no integrity when it came to illegally doing government business on her private email account.  Of course FoxNews makes no mention of that.

At least this guy had the decency to spare the tax payers money and plea guilty.  Palin is doing everything she can to suppress the American legal system.

Hilarious.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

You guys are kicking a 20 year old kid.

I believe you mean a 20-year old felon.  Can you see the difference between someone who intentionally breaks into personal records and a pregnant 17-year old girl.  My advise is to stop where you are and hope for the best for the mother and child.  That is what a real man would do.

atease

atease

Hiney finds it easy to kick a woman and her teenage daughter.

I believe you meant Felon and teenage sexually irresponsible adult.  She did make the decision to get married herself, didn’t she?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

Give it up Hanny and live to fight another day.  YOU KICKED a woman and her teenage pregnant daughter.  You are no longer in the men’s club.  Go sit at the kids table and we will serve you dinner when it is ready.

atease

atease

What is the usual penalty for a first time offender for this crime?

That is what she should get.

Sarah is a VP candidate atease.  This is 2008.  Even Rob understands that she can take the criticism.

And if your boy can question this guys father influence on his sons behavior, so can we question Sarah’s influence on her daughter.

Grow up atease.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

What is the usual penalty for a first time offender for this crime?

That is what she should get.

I believe the offense is called MOTHER.  That is why she should not be kicked.  That she is a teenage mother to be is more reason to NOT kick her.

Just give Mr. Hannitized a time out at the kids table and we will forgive him as long as he does not go there again. 

atease

atease

You guys are kicking a 20 year old kid.

If he broke the law, he deserves to be punished for it; his age is no excuse.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

I just ran Bill Ayers as well nothing…

Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

What is the usual penalty for a first time offender for this crime?

That is what she should get.

This seems about right to me:

If convicted of the felony charge, Kernell, an economics major at the University of Tennessee, faces a maximum of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

Check out:
Goon’s North Dakota Red Neck
Goon’s World

You just don’t get it do you Hanny..?

You pick on a child and sit there and type all proudly.  Well, you look like a fool. 

This guy’s (an f’n state representative) son is a 20-year old college kid.  He is of legal age. She is a 17-year old, under age child.

Do you remember the difference between 17 and 20, or are you not there yet?  That question is why I keep sending you to the kids table.  You are acting like a spoiled child.

You are beating on an UNDER AGE PREGNANT GIRL, and you feel good about it.  How do these two compare..?

You tell me to grow up.  I tell you to MAN UP.  Be a man and stop beating on a pregnant child.

Any way, I am retiring for tonight.  Therefore, you will not get fed and have to go to bed without dinner.  Maybe you will learn from this.

atease

atease

You pick on a child and sit there and type all proudly.  Well, you look like a fool.

I am questioning Sarah Palin’s influence, just as Whistler is questioning this kids fathers influence.  So your “kicked a girl” theory is just bogus bullshit.

Further, if she is old enough to decide to get married, then she is old enough to be held responsible for her decisions, irresponsible or not.

Unless you can tell me she is not mature enough to raise a child and choose marriage you are full of shit.

If you can tell me those two things than you would be speaking from principle.  But since you are not......well?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

He did not break into a minor’s e-mail. 

He broke into Sarah Palin’s private e-mail, not a government e-mail.

He should get the same punishment as anybody else who committed a similar crime with no priors.  It is not the maximum, unless

Lestat,

Because this showed that Palin was sending emails regarding official government business from her private email account, she is being investigated.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

At age 24, he’ll be in this mess under probation and with a felony on his record. He’s already facing a shitty future.

He’ll probably end up exiled to the board of some Liberal foundation like Bill Ayers did. The Left never lets any criminal act against the Right go unrewarded. This clown already has the Left making excuses for him. He’s already achieved hero status.

My, My
Just look at the chests swelled with pride at the apprentice’s caper.
He should get twice the maximum because, as a child of a politician, he knew his actions were both illegal & immoral.

Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

If you can tell me those two things than you would be speaking from principle.

The Dem’s kid is accused of a felony; Bristol Palin is not.  You have no point; only a feeble attempt to distract from the real crime here.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

No, he should get what any citizen of the US should get when committing such a crime IF FOUND GUILTY.

Right now he is indicted not convicted of such.

It should not matter his social status or who his friends / or family is, but I have a feeling he will get a much less sentence, probably probation and a fine, and not what everyone here hopes.

Most likely the judge will see the father as a democratic state rep, and if this is the first time, will give him nothing more than a slap on the wrist (probation and fine).

I highly doubt this kid will see the inside of a jail cell.

When we expect less that minimal personal Responsibility, we get less.
While he’s admitted online to committing the felony, there’s still the question of motive.
He should still get double.

Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

The Dem’s kid is accused of a felony; Bristol Palin is not.

I didn’t say she should go to jail.  So you have have no argument.  You can’t seem to make cogent arguments.  Why?

If you are going to make a comparison, make an apt one.

I am not comparing her irresponsible behavior to this kid. I am comparing Palin’s responsibility to this kids father.

When I speak about this young woman and her situation.  I clearly state you can’t be on both sides of the argument. Either she is a child or she is an adult.  Which is it?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

He should still get double.

That is nuts my friend.  Your logic for sentencing has no basis in how the American justice system works. 

We have to know about his record.  If it is clean, he will get a slap on the wrist.  Cyber crime, weather you know it or not, is not a serious crime if it is not based on economic fraud. 

He will get in trouble for violating privacy agreements, cyber fraud class c felony (it’s not malicious) and possibly soliciting of private property.

At most he will get 3-6 months, a fine and tons of probation.  Out in 4 weeks.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

At most he will get 3-6 months, a fine and tons of probation.  Out in 4 weeks.

I agree - except I don’t think he will get any jail time (basing on if his record is clean).

Lots of probations, fine and a stern warning is what I see in his future.

Your logic for sentencing has no basis in how the American justice system works. 

You know ...You’re right.
Let’s just forego the Laws for everyone!
Let’s not punish anyone.
Even let O.J. loose again.
After all....oh nevermind

(it’s not malicious

Not malicious, you say?
If that were so, why would he have posted info on the net?
.
.
THis stance is all too typical from leftists today.
When one of theirs is on the hook, they scream & squeal.
When a conservative is on the hook, they instantly call for his head.
More social engineering from those that gave us the Fan/Fred fiasco.

Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

Hannitized,

I have a 20 yr. old daughter with a 2 1/2 yr. old son, and a 8 mo. old daughter. Are you suggesting that it is my fault or that I was slutty because she got pregnant {and married} so young??? I don’t think you should even think about going there! I was not happy she chose to get married and have a family so young, she has an i.q.of 167, and was sent her h.s. yrs. to a $35,000 a yr. boarding school,and given every opportunity. However, that being said, she is a fantastic mother, raises her own children, goes to college p/t and works a few days a week. As for this little punk, he should get enough punishment in order to enable him to understand he seriously wronged someone. I also have a 19 yr. old son and would demand he was punished. Bristol Palin made a moral decision, this guy committed a crime.

I am questioning Sarah Palin’s influence, just as Whistler is questioning this kids fathers influence.  So your “kicked a girl” theory is just bogus bullshit.

OK, let’s look at Palin’s influence. The girl is engaged, and seems to have been engaged before the pregnancy. She’s already in a committed relationship. She decides to have sex with the man she loves and gets pregnant. Instead of having an abortion, she decides to keep the child, and the family still loves her and continues to accept her fiancee into the Palin bunch.

Even accepting that the sex was irresponsible, she did the right thing afterwards. If anything, this speaks highly of the Palin’s influence on their daughter. No parent can prevent their child from having sex, especially when they get engaged and are over the legal limit (16 in Alaska). But instead of taking the easy way out, the girl has taken responsibility. This is what should happen.

How is this comparable to a college student committing a crime? Sex is something we’re all to expect at some point, hacking’s not ever acceptable. Bristol jumped the gun a tad, this boy did a constant no-no.

For the first time in my adult life, I am ashamed of my country.

My, My
Just look at the chests swelled with pride at the apprentice’s caper.
He should get twice the maximum because, as a child of a politician, he knew his actions were both illegal & immoral.

So because Daddy is a famous guy he should get double? That’s bullshit if I ever heard it. EVERY kid who hacks knows their actions are illegal and immoral. Most people who commit crimes know that.

At most, the kid should get a couple months in jail, a couple hundred hours of community service, a fine, and a year or two of probation.

Let’s not bankrupt the twerp. He needs a wake up call, and to have to bust his ass as punishment. None of us should want him to get passed around like a pack of smokes. Yea, he’ll be a real class act after getting raped for 5 years, only to come out in the world and be in debt for the rest of his life (10 figures Lik...really?). We’re really going for blood over something so small. And it’s rather disturbing.

For the first time in my adult life, I am ashamed of my country.

This picture has got to be pretty old. He no longer looks like this.

You guys are kicking a 20 year old kid.  If you want to be treated with respect, show some.

VS

I believe you meant Felon and teenage sexually irresponsible adult.  She did make the decision to get married herself, didn’t she?

Egads, what a dope. Do you ever read your own posts?

This so called “Kid” is an adult who decided to hack into some ones PC. Most PC’s have bank statements and sensitive information that could destroy a persons credit etc. This is not a small crime. It is a good thing he got caught at such a young age. Hopefully he will learn his lesson?

Not her PC, her yahoo web mail account.

While there may be and probably is private data in there it’s not as bad as hacking a home or business computer from the standpoint of what is probably there.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

Let’s keep things in perspective here.

What this idiot did was wrong - and a felony.

That being said, I’m having a hard time seeing a 20 year old go to a federal prison for it. A hefty fine, probation, maybe some limited jail time (couple of weeks, a month).

Don’t forget that if he’s convicted he’ll also have a federal conviction on his record for the rest of his life. The impact of that is HUGE.

Will he be convicted? Probably. The feds don’t usually indict until they have all their ducks in a row.

The future ain’t what it used to be.....

I didn’t say she should go to jail.

As usual, you made a false equivalence.  There is no comparison between Bristol and this young felon, except that you are doing your usual bullshit attempts to distract from the topic.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

Come on guys!

Just settle it o.k.? 30 days in, 2-3 yr. prob., maybe a little community service, and a fine. It would be stupid to put him in prison and subject him to anal reammings! Do you honestly think it would be a good idea to make him a prison love toy?? You guys are kinda sick. I do think he would never have thought to do this if it wasn’t for the fact of who his father is. Didn’t he say he couldn’t find anything in the e-mails like “they” were expecting?

He violated her “Right to Privacy”, didn’t he?  Isn’t that a terrible crime to the lefties?

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

It is possible.  Because certainly we know Sarah Palins little daughter learned how to be easy with her sexual offers with men.

As usual, your response to an issue unfavorable to your party is to bring up another issue that has nothing to do with it.  You can call yourself a debater of facts when you can stop ducking cover behind the skirt of a pregnant teenage girl.  Kernell screwed up, but I think his punishment should fit the crime.  Make him answer phones for Dell tech support at a call center in Bangalore for a few months.  He’ll beg for prison time after that.

Do you honestly think it would be a good idea to make him a prison love toy??

He made the choice to violate Sarah’s privacy, now let him enjoy the consequences of his actions.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

I think his family should have to make a $100,000 contribution to the McCain campaign.

Grrrrrrrrrr

What I find amazing is that this kid didn’t realize what he was doing was a federal crime. There were a couple things he did, such as the email he used, which pointed right to him.  Maybe he thought because his dad was a state senator he could get away with it or something.. Not that I think his dad was involved because I don’t--it’s just that it makes you wonder why he would do such a stupid idiot thing. It’s a federal crime for pete’s sake.

What I find amazing is that this kid didn’t realize what he was doing was a federal crime.

Actually, he did. he wrote in one of his e-mails that if the feds find him, he’s f***ed.

No excuse there.

The future ain’t what it used to be.....

Actually, he did. he wrote in one of his e-mails that if the feds find him, he’s f***ed.

Yes.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

Bristol Palin made a moral decision, this guy committed a crime.

Nicely stated Di

he couldn’t find anything in the e-mails like “they” were expecting?

Not sure how to take that one, was he using a ‘royal we?’ ‘Our side as anointed by God will rake the mud!’ or was it more sinister ‘Daddy asked for some help on a project.’ I figure the elitist version.

Di

Bristol Palin made a moral decision, this guy committed a crime.

I don’t know if you know it or not, but they are both moral decisions.  Committing sin is no difference in the eyes of God if it is a crime or not.  Yes or no?

So when you are judging someone morally, there is no difference.

I have a 20 yr. old daughter with a 2 1/2 yr. old son, and a 8 mo. old daughter. Are you suggesting that it is my fault or that I was slutty because she got pregnant {and married} so young???

What I am suggesting is the same thing Whislter is suggesting.  The parents are either an influence on their child’s immoral behavior or they are not. 

Personally, I don’t think either was influenced by their parents.  But if Whister is dumb enough to make that argument then he better be smart enough to realize that his argument works both ways.  I am demonstrating the idiocy of his logic.

Don’t take this personal, I was talking about Palin.  I have no knowledge of your actions when you were young. 

. But instead of taking the easy way out, the girl has taken responsibility. This is what should happen.

How is this comparable to a college student committing a crime?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

Zsa Zsa says:

This so called “Kid” is an adult who decided to hack into some ones PC. Most PC’s have bank statements and sensitive information that could destroy a persons credit etc.

No, he did not “hack into her PC”.  He hacked into the email account that she used that was hosted by an ISP.  Her email is sitting on some server in some data center far removed from her personal PC.  You are way off base here Zsa.

This is not a small crime.

Hacking into someone’s hosted email account IS a small thing in the cyber crime arena.  Trust me.  FBI agents identify that 13 yr old kids hack into larger corporations systems.  Do you know what the FBI does to those kids?  They threaten them with jail time unless they tech the FBI cyber crime unit how they did it.  Then they let them off.

Do you know what used to happen to the best hackers that hacked into government servers?  They got jobs after they got warnings.  Hacking used to be a badge of honor because it wasn’t usually malicious, it was usually a statement.  You guys just don’t know what you are talking about.

Now, today, cyber crime is different because today hackers are malicious and they choose to remain anonymous when they hack into government databases or servers, because, why?  Because they are malicious these days.

This kid will get month or two for show and then let out early.

It is a good thing he got caught at such a young age. Hopefully he will learn his lesson?

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

So when you are judging someone morally, there is no difference.

You are the only one trying to distract from this guy’s felony by prattling about morality.  Pretty strange for a leftie.
Only you would be moronic enough to try to make an equivalence between felonious invasion of privacy and a teenage girl becoming pregnant before she and her fiance get married.
Pathetic and desperate.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

As usual, you made a false equivalence.  There is no comparison between Bristol and this young felon,

Of course there is.  They both made Moral decisions that were of bad judgement.  No parent wants their child to get pregnant at 16.

Bill O’Rielly hammered Britney Spears parents for their youngest daughter getting pregnant and called her a pinhead.  Now when it was Sarah Palins daughter he claims its is a private matter that we should not discuss.

Conservatives are just hypocrites, and I am revealing that with every argument I make.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

What you are all missing is that this felon tried to influence an election, which is a much worse crime than hacking into someone’s private email account.
This is the crime for which he should be punished severely.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

.. try to make an equivalence between felonious invasion of privacy and a teenage girl becoming pregnant before she and her fiance get married.

I hate to bust your bubble Robert but everyone knows there was no intent for the children to get married prior to Palins run for VP.

Sarah forced her child to get married for her selfish political ambitions.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

What you are all missing is that this felon tried to influence an election,

1,000.00 bucks says that he never gets charged with that accusation you made up. 

You don’t know how the legal system works friend.  Even if that was true, and it isn’t, no judge in the land could use that as justification for determining a sentence.  That is not how the American justice system works.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

...everyone knows there was no intent for the children to get married prior to Palins run for VP.

Another lie from you.  You still can’t stay on topic, I see.
This thread is about the fact that we caught the felon who violated Sarah’s privacy, for the purposes of influencing an election.
You are getting increasingly desperate with every off-topic comment.

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

It is such a hoot when the left preaches morality when they think it fits their argument.

Hannitized says: I don’t know if you know it or not, but they are both moral decisions.  Committing sin is no difference in the eyes of God if it is a crime or not.  Yes or no?

So when you are judging someone morally, there is no difference.

Then they totally forget their lack of morality of their “Messiah.”

So, what are we to make of Obama’s votes against protecting the right to life for living babies who have survived attempted abortions? Such babies are sometimes born alive as a result of late-term induced labor abortions, often sought when babies are believed (sometimes in error) to have genetic defects such as Down syndrome.

Earlier this decade, such living, breathing, babies who survived labor were “shelved” - left to die and disposed of with other medical waste, or were “aborted” - killed outside the womb. The practice was ultimately banned by unanimous Congressional votes, as even the most pro-abortion Senate Democrats - including every defender of partial-birth abortion - recognized that killing these breathing babies is no longer abortion in any real sense. It crosses the line; it is infanticide. Yet, incredibly, Obama repeatedly worked to deny these living babies any right to life.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1207159750412&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

...that accusation you made up.

Wrong again; that’s what he did.  Of course, you could always come up with another reason why he, the son of a Dem politician, targeted Sarah for his felonious behavior.
Got anything?
Why her?  Why now?

"Give the lefties a pile of money, and they’ll spend it buying votes.” - Rush Limbaugh on the “bailout”.

I hate to bust your bubble Robert but everyone knows there was no intent for the children to get married prior to Palins run for VP.

Sarah forced her child to get married for her selfish political ambitions.

Everyone knows?

Who knows that?

I hate to bust your bubble, lying Liberal scum, but that’s your opinion. If you have proof, prove it. Otherwise you just got caught lying again. Like we needed more proof that you are a liar.

I don’t know if you know it or not, but they are both moral decisions.  Committing sin is no difference in the eyes of God if it is a crime or not.  Yes or no?

So when you are judging someone morally, there is no difference.

H,

Th eyes of God is an irrelevant assertion, since I am sure He is able to make His own judgment about the behavior of all of us.  Besides, it is those of you on the Left who are constantly carping about injecting God and religion into matters of public policy.  Your doing so here would seem to be a pretty substantial leap in hypocrisy.

Finally, please explain how those of you of the party which nominated John Edwards for VP, and elected Bill Clinton President, both major league philanderers, should be so presumptuous as to lecture the rest of us about moral behavior.  Your sanctimony has a distinctly hollow ring to it.

“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

I assume the point was to change the argument away from the young, thugish, heavy handed, faux morally superior, soon to be felon.  Claim equivalence for a non-crime then subject change to how awful the rethugs are?
When ya’ll get together for marching orders, does the group leader dress up as a giant KoolAid pitcher?

Hacking into someone’s hosted email account IS a small thing

We’ll see how you feel when someone “hacks” the small lock on your personal property.
THere is no difference no matter how much the leftists want it to be.

Without an honest exchange of ideas, how can a mind grow?

Finally, please explain how those of you of the party which nominated John Edwards for VP, and elected Bill Clinton President, both major league philanderers, should be so presumptuous as to lecture the rest of us about moral behavior.  Your sanctimony has a distinctly hollow ring to it.

Being as Republicans are the official party of closet homosexual pedafiles, I’m not sure they have the right to lecture on morals either.

It is such a hoot when the left preaches morality when they think it fits their argument.

What you fail to grasp, rightwing, is that I am holding you to your own standards.  So if you are the party of morals, then you have to abide by them.  The liberals are accused of being immoral.  Surely you know this.

So when we hold you to the standards you have set for yourself, there is no contradiction.

This, of course, is aside from the fact that there are indeed liberals who weigh morality and who have God in their lives.

The bottom line is right is right and wrong is wrong.  Then, you have the law.  See the difference?

Here is a hint.  It is not against the law to sleep with another mans wife, in some states, but it certainly is wrong.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

I am holding you to your own standards.

No you’re not.  You are proving that you are too stupid to understand the difference between a teenager having sex and a twenty something committing a felony.

I’m not surprised at all of your ignorance.

What’s going to happen to US industry when the global warming extremists like John McCain double the price of electricity?  I would think all these factories will close and set up in countries where they aren’t scared of technology.

Being as Republicans are the official party of closet homosexual pedafiles [sic], I’m not sure they have the right to lecture on morals either.

R,

Leaving aside the speciousness of your argument (and the fact that obviously those of us on/in the Right are also the more proper and effective users of language), you will find by actually reading the entire thread that it was one of your own self-styled “progressives” who tried to draw a moral equivalency between young Mr. Kernell’s felonious actions (that means he seriously broke the law!) and the entirely spurious moral question of Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy.

Since the question of sexual impropriety had been raised, the mention of John Edwards and Bill Clinton, well known Democrats, was entirely appropriate.  Homosexual behavior, overt or covert, hadn’t been raised til you stumbled in here.  The question at issue was one of legal culpability and punishment.

Still, I understand that y’all would wish to change the subject from the illegal actions of a Democrat officeholder’s son, and try to attack Sarah Palin backhandedly at the same time.  Problem is, you just won’t find the same level of stupidity here than you will at Kos, HuffPo or DU.  Sorry!

“Poverty of goods is easily cured; poverty of the mind is irreparable.”

Hannitized: 

Sarah forced her child to get married for her selfish political ambitions.

That’s a serious accusation.  Have you proof of that, Hannitized?

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

Since you obviously missed this the first time, here it is again, lying scumbag:

I hate to bust your bubble Robert but everyone knows there was no intent for the children to get married prior to Palins run for VP.

Sarah forced her child to get married for her selfish political ambitions.

Everyone knows?

Who knows that?

I hate to bust your bubble, lying Liberal scum, but that’s your opinion. If you have proof, prove it. Otherwise you just got caught lying again. Like we needed more proof that you are a liar.

Answer the questions, liar.

Hannitized: 

You guys are kicking a 20 year old kid.

Kid?  He’s a voter, able to wear the uniform of our nation, and a legal adult.

He knew exactly what he was doing.  He wanted to help destroy Governor Palin’s reputation and career.

He should, and will, pay the penalty.

On the other hand, efforts to tie his criminal activity to his father are specious and ill-advised.

"Here lies, in honored glory, an American soldier, known but to God.”

The times, they are a-changin’...
Bob Dylan

No you’re not.  You are proving that you are too stupid to understand the difference between a teenager having sex and a twenty something committing a felony.

I’m not surprised at all of your ignorance.

What I am not surprised with is that in your world, you can’t see a difference between a kid hacking a single email account and a guy who may sleep with your wife.

If you had a choice, which would you rather have happen to you and your family?  Have a another man sleep with your wife (if it is legal is your state), have your daughter impregnated at 16.......or your hotmail account hacked?

Take you pick and then shut your gums.

Because we all know which one you would choose.  Don’t give me this false outrage over a hacked email account.  You use the word felony as if it made the situation worse.  It doesn’t.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

it was one of your own self-styled “progressives” who tried to draw a moral equivalency between young Mr. Kernell’s felonious actions (that means he seriously broke the law!) and the entirely spurious moral question of Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy.

Same question to you Bat.  If you had a choice between having your hotmail account hacked, or your daughter impregnated at 16.  Which would you choose?

You are right about one thing.  There is no moral equivalence between the two.  Having your daughter pregnant at 16 is a far more traumatic experience on the family and all of the lives involved than having an email hacked. 

One of them is legal (in some states), one of them is not.  I submit to you that having your 16yr old daughter impregnated is a much more significant moral outrage.

Combating Republican dirty tricks since 2002!

Example: Republican Dirty Trick

Hannitized: 

having your 1